• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

It's Over

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
OK, maybe the fat lady is warming up for Kerry, Ohio is now reporting 82% with little to no change (still 120-130000 difference). According to fox. Now NH is awarded to Kerry as of right now.

Where are you seeing 82%, I've been watching here.
 
If Ohio ends with less than 150,000 votes separating Bush and Kerry, it will be a week until we find out who won... all the re-counts, provisional votes and crap will take some time.
 
Even if OH goes Bush, that's only 266EV's, no way in HELL MN will go red and I seriously doubt MI will either. NV is leaning slightly Kerry at this time. OK Fox just gave OH to Bush
 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
OK, maybe the fat lady is warming up for Kerry, Ohio is now reporting 82% with little to no change (still 120-130000 difference). According to fox. Now NH is awarded to Kerry as of right now.

Where are you seeing 82%, I've been watching here.

For some reason, Yahoo! has the results quicker.
 
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
Even if OH goes Bush, that's only 266EV's, no way in HELL MN will go red and I seriously doubt MI will either. NV is leaning slightly Kerry at this time. OK Fox just gave OH to Bush

Fox: OH to Bush???

I still think it's too early to call.
 
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
OK, maybe the fat lady is warming up for Kerry, Ohio is now reporting 82% with little to no change (still 120-130000 difference). According to fox. Now NH is awarded to Kerry as of right now.

Where are you seeing 82%, I've been watching here.

For some reason, Yahoo! has the results quicker.

That's a CNN link!?!
 
it's over.

hopefully the Dems will use the next 4 years to realize that the party is in serious need of some change. IMO, Kerry didn't deserve to win. His campaign was pretty pathetic until late-September/October.

but having two branches of the government controlled by one party is pretty damn depressing.
 
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
OK, maybe the fat lady is warming up for Kerry, Ohio is now reporting 82% with little to no change (still 120-130000 difference). According to fox. Now NH is awarded to Kerry as of right now.

Where are you seeing 82%, I've been watching here.

From the talking heads on the Boob Tube.
 
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: JoLLyRoGer
OK, maybe the fat lady is warming up for Kerry, Ohio is now reporting 82% with little to no change (still 120-130000 difference). According to fox. Now NH is awarded to Kerry as of right now.

Where are you seeing 82%, I've been watching here.

For some reason, Yahoo! has the results quicker.

That's a CNN link!?!

That's what happens when you forget to clear the clipboard.

Try this one.
 
Well, CNN and MSNBC are holding off on calling OH for Bush right now. Methinks Fox could be jumping the gun?
 
Originally posted by: loki8481
it's over.

hopefully the Dems will use the next 4 years to realize that the party is in serious need of some change. IMO, Kerry didn't deserve to win. His campaign was pretty pathetic until late-September/October.

but having two branches of the government controlled by one party is pretty damn depressing.

They would have to really sell out their ideals to get more votes it seems like. The people voting for Bush are hard-core and it appears that its mainly a matter of social conservativvism. The only thing that's going to change all this is the influx from south of the border...
 
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Well, Fox didn't give a state to a candidate at 0% of the vote as some other networks did. 😛

True, but c'mon, I mean California, NY, Illinois and Texas? Give me a break. I called those states last year! Guess what, I was right too.
 
Just couldn't sleep over here in the uk - no one wanted to call this so I looked at CNN - great to be able to see the precinct returns, which have shown for a while that Cuyahoga could not outweigh Bush's lead.

BTW, Americans are crazy to have voted Bush but most of you know that 🙂.
 
Looks like the gap just dropped 40,000 votes with 86% now being reported in OH (MSNBC)

Don't forget about absentee and provisional ballots. Provisionals may not be counted until as late as Dec.
 
Back
Top