<< If K-mart ceases to do business, it's going to be a staggering blow to the economy. The lines of influence are manifold. Immediately, there are thousands of unempolyed people from the K-mart corporation. There are millions of square feet of retail space going unused. The property owners cease to receive lease payments from K-mart, so they are in trouble too. The suppliers to K-mart are superscrewed, because in some cases, K-mart is their main customer. So they have to close up shop too. So more layoffs from those suppliers.
Now none of the thousands of laid off people can afford to eat at KFC or buy shoes from Payless or whatever. So it ripples through the country, resulting in more layoffs and less spending and more layoffs until some kind of lower equilibrium is finally attained.
Now this is America, so there will be a lot of new jobs created, and so forth. Suppliers will shift to Wal-mart, Wal-mart may move into old K-mart buildings in some places at fire sale prices, etc. But it won't be instantaneous, and you still have the chicken and egg problem getting the economy to move up again.
Anyway, it's the overall slam to our weak economy that is important here. Not whether or not K-mart is as shiny as Wal-mart. >>
K-mart has been dying a slow death for years. This was when the economy was booming. Now the economy has gone through one moderaly bad year and K-mart topples. Yes it will be an immense pain for the people directly affected (employees, etc). However it won't have a noticible effect on the American economy. I've heard about 350 stores will close. That is such a small fraction of the total national stores that its ripple effects will be small. It isn't like K-mart is disappearing completely (yet) just it is removing the unprofitable stores.
K-mart was extremely inefficient (hence its struggles) - getting rid of an inefficient beast can be a good thing for the economy (in the long term). New businesses can come in and buy cheap property vacated by K-mart - and hire some of the unemployed K-mart workers. If the new businesses are efficient, it will be a good thing for the economy. If they are as inefficient as K-mart, then they will go down the tubes as well.
The suppliers can move their supplies to a different store. Take Martha Stewart for example, with a bankruptcy she is now free to take her line of quality goods anywhere she wants. She is no longer castrated by K-marts inefficiency. Sears, Wal-Mart, Shop-Co, Target, etc are all posibilities. She may do much better at a different location. Thus the suppliers MAY be hurt, but MAY be helped.