ITC judge rules Nvidia infringes Samsung patents

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

monstercameron

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2013
3,818
1
0
So, basically, you're saying that Nvidia being a smaller company automatically means that their suit wasn't frivolous?


The last statement was really just a general opinion not specific to this. I only really added it so that people wouldn't mistakenly think that I think that it's okay that money wins out. I do not think that money is the only reason Nvidia lost, and they would have lost in a fair trial too.

ok, thanks for clarifying.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Hopefully this will discourage Nvidia from trying anything like this again. If you want to be Apple and get away with it, you need Apple money. Trying to do it to a company like Samsung, which actually has Apple money, was just stupid.


That said, it's sad that money decides these cases.

So are you saying that nVidia had grounds but because they don't have as much money they lost? It's not possible their case was baseless? It's not possible that Samsung's counter suit was legit? If so, what are you basing this on?

Edit: Missed where you clarified later.
 
Last edited: