• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

It was the Chinese government that attacked Gmail some months back

Kalmah

Diamond Member
Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack
VeriSign iDefense researchers have identified the source of the recent cyber-assault against Google and have found the command-and-control servers that were used to orchestrate the attack.

By Ryan Paul | Last updated January 14, 2010 8:45 AM


VeriSign's iDefense security lab has published a report with technical details about the recent cyberattack that hit Google and over 30 other companies. The iDefense researchers traced the attack back to its origin and also identified the command-and-control servers that were used to manage the malware.

The cyber-assault came to light on Tuesday when Google disclosed to the public that the Gmail Web service was targeted in a highly-organized attack in late December. Google said that the intrusion attempt originated from China and was executed with the goal of obtaining information about political dissidents, but the company declined to speculate about the identity of the perpetrator.

Citing sources in the defense contracting and intelligence consulting community, the iDefense report unambiguously declares that the Chinese government was, in fact, behind the effort. The report also says that the malicious code was deployed in PDF files that were crafted to exploit a vulnerability in Adobe's software.

"The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof," the report says.

The researchers have determined that there are significant similarities between the recent attack and a seemingly related one that was carried out in July against a large number of US companies. Both attacks were apparently managed through the same command-and-control servers.

"The servers used in both attacks employ the HomeLinux DynamicDNS provider, and both are currently pointing to IP addresses owned by Linode, a US-based company that offers Virtual Private Server hosting. The IP addresses in question are within the same subnet, and they are six IP addresses apart from each other," the report says. "Considering this proximity, it is possible that the two attacks are one and the same, and that the organizations targeted in the Silicon Valley attacks have been compromised since July."

If the report's findings are correct, it suggests that the government of China has been engaged for months in a massive campaign of industrial espionage against US companies.

http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2010/01/researchers-identify-command-servers-behind-google-attack.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss


I wonder what their intentions are?

BTW, if this belongs in P&N please move it there. I was originally intending this to be more of a PSA but now I'm not so sure.
 
Supposed exploited some vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer (Mario Bartiromo brought this up today during interview of Steve Balmer).
 
Last edited:
Fuck. I thought Russia was going to be the biggest Cyber Warfare threat, thus one of my reasons for deciding to take Russian at school. Not that I'm exactly doing all that great with the language.

Ah who am I kidding... I most certainly would never enroll in any course for the various Chinese dialects for fear of fucking up GPA, not that that stopped me from failing anyhow. 🙂
🙁

Regardless...

I hate China. Sorry Chinese people, it's not you. Well, kind of. Revolt already dammit!
 
Sooo, what are we going to do about it?

This is the one time when "liberals" SHOULD have the solution, considering their supposed to be known for keeping up with science and technology.
But their still a bunch of passive pussies who aren't going to have the balls to take any political action against China, because they are going to look at cyber-warfare as something akin to one big joke. They won't take cyber-threats seriously.

Oddly enough, it's one of my main areas I would thoroughly as a career for the government - signal security.
 
This is the one time when "liberals" SHOULD have the solution, considering their supposed to be known for keeping up with science and technology.
But their still a bunch of passive pussies who aren't going to have the balls to take any political action against China, because they are going to look at cyber-warfare as something akin to one big joke. They won't take cyber-threats seriously.

Oddly enough, it's one of my main areas I would thoroughly as a career for the government - signal security.

Are you really this stupid?
 
This is the one time when "liberals" SHOULD have the solution, considering their supposed to be known for keeping up with science and technology.
But their still a bunch of passive pussies who aren't going to have the balls to take any political action against China, because they are going to look at cyber-warfare as something akin to one big joke. They won't take cyber-threats seriously.

Oddly enough, it's one of my main areas I would thoroughly as a career for the government - signal security.

Given the big roll signals intelligence played in the allies winning WW2, as well as being a big part of the 'warfare' that occured in the cold war, you'd think it would been given higher precedence.
The US is starting to take this Internet stuff seriously though.
 
This is the one time when "liberals" SHOULD have the solution, considering their supposed to be known for keeping up with science and technology.
But their still a bunch of passive pussies who aren't going to have the balls to take any political action against China, because they are going to look at cyber-warfare as something akin to one big joke. They won't take cyber-threats seriously.

Oddly enough, it's one of my main areas I would thoroughly as a career for the government - signal security.

keep the p&n crap in p&n.
 
GMail isn't heavily used overseas though. It's just like how gchat and AIM are huge in the US here, but no one gives a crap about MSN/Yahoo. Well, Yahoo is huge overseas.

Cut off Google from China, and they'll probably be ok. It's like cutting off iPhones to them. Doesn't matter, because most people use iPhones unlocked from the grey market anyway.

But anyway, let's do it. Let's see what happens.
 
Last edited:
Liberals are usually the side billing themselves as the intellectuals who are up to date on everything relevant today at the expense of the bumpkin GOP (grand old party anyone?). No?

Don't get me wrong, I'm no republican, but that seems to be where they try to stand.

but what does that have to do with a political response or anything else on this front?
 
Back
Top