Lord Evermore
Diamond Member
- Oct 10, 1999
- 9,558
- 0
- 76
I know it's nitpicking, especially with the assumption of it not being real, but one would generally be inclined to grammar and spell-check one's own resignation letter in which one derided the abilities of the boss.
"harassment" would automatically be presumed to be "annoying", thus making that redundant.
"myself and her employees"?
The use of the word "shiftlessly" is somewhat odd. Technically usable I suppose, but only barely.
"sharp dressed" should be hyphenated. Probably a comma after it as well but perhaps not.
"Managers like you're a sad proof of the Dilbert principle." -- the most horrific use of a contraction I've ever seen. I'm not even sure if it's technically wrong, but I'm betting it is, since "you" is not the subject of the sentence; "managers like you" is, and one would not expect a phrase to be used in a contraction. It's also plural, so it should be simply "sad proof", not "a sad proof".
A search for Zantex Computers of course brings up this letter many many times.
"harassment" would automatically be presumed to be "annoying", thus making that redundant.
"myself and her employees"?
The use of the word "shiftlessly" is somewhat odd. Technically usable I suppose, but only barely.
"sharp dressed" should be hyphenated. Probably a comma after it as well but perhaps not.
"Managers like you're a sad proof of the Dilbert principle." -- the most horrific use of a contraction I've ever seen. I'm not even sure if it's technically wrong, but I'm betting it is, since "you" is not the subject of the sentence; "managers like you" is, and one would not expect a phrase to be used in a contraction. It's also plural, so it should be simply "sad proof", not "a sad proof".
A search for Zantex Computers of course brings up this letter many many times.
