• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

IT guy here is incompetent

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
First if the PC's using 4gb's of RAM are running 32 bit versions of XP they can't make use of anything beyond 3gb's as far as I know because of OS limitations. Second running the laptop while using a CRT in a docking station won't make a bit of difference heat-wise.(however it will add life to the LCD on the laptop) Third, SCSI is a waste of money in non-server applications based on every credible benchmark I've seen in the last couple years which show it being significantly out-performed by ATA-100/133 & especially SATA in applications where the HD's switch back & forth from reads to writes frequently. (Large sequential reads are a very different story)
 
Originally posted by: Captante
First if the PC's using 4gb's of RAM are running 32 bit versions of XP they can't make use of anything beyond 3gb's as far as I know because of OS limitations. Second running the laptop while using a CRT in a docking station won't make a bit of difference heat-wise.(however it will add life to the LCD on the laptop) Third, SCSI is a waste of money in non-server applications based on every credible benchmark I've seen in the last couple years which show it being significantly out-performed by ATA-100/133 & especially SATA in applications where the HD's switch back & forth from reads to writes frequently. (Large sequential reads are a very different story)

I thought 2^32 was 4 GB?
 
Back
Top