To start out with PJIBBERISH, the League of nations is defunct, it died before WW2 so why the hell are you citing the League of Nations now???????????
Because the League of Nations was the U.N. predecessor that was the international body that was put together at that time to do what the U.N. is supposed to be doing now. If you advocate for the dominant transnationalism of the U.N., then you must accept the legality of Israel from the international body that allowed and supported its foundation at the time, around 1922 if I recall correctly.
Like McCrystal, the old king is dead, and the UN, right or wrong is the new king gold standard that sets the international rules.
The U.N. is a facade. It has no power other than the power sovereign states are willing to cede it. It is the gold standard for absolutely nothing and no amount of claims that it is will turn that sow's ear into a purse.
So first lets address your first distortion, there are precious few Israeli Palestinians, Israel took care of them with enabling legislation forcefully declaring them non persons even if some 1.5 million Arabs have something like first class Israeli citizenship.
While I can dispute your numbers and characterization of the citizenship these so-called "Arab not Palestinian" (LOL!) Israeli citizens have, I will certainly point out that they have rights to the land and businesses they have built into a very successful Israeli economy.
And what should really be troubling you, if you were to think this through, is that the population of millions of Israelis are not just Arab and "others," it is a real hodge podge of races and national origins that became Israeli after persecutions from Africa to Asia to Europe.
Even if you ignore the non-Arab populations, your proposals will destroy the "Israeli Arab" population's right to maintain what they have worked hard to achieve.
In fact, your proposals will have the effect of completely disenfranchising this population. Now, do you really expect them to stand against Israel and for a foreign population that would claim their land, farms, houses and businesses? Or do you fantasize that they would prefer the bully boys of Hammas, Fatah and Hizballoh over the Israelis that have worked at their side their entire lives while the welfare "Palestinians" have lived off others' generosity and never did anything to become self-sufficient but now come to claim what they left 65 years ago?
Wouldn't they stand even closer to their Israeli neighbors should the threat of external and internal war fade? Clue: Check out the enthusiasm of the Druze population for Israeli military service and their demands for full integration into the best front line units.
After that you ask some thorny questions while totally ignoring the fact that we have almost 4 million Palestinians with human rights that need addressing. In short, not addressing the thorny problems to include the Palestinians is not acceptable either.
The questions are not thorny to me. They are questions that you refuse to consider so they are thorny to you.
To my mind it is quite simple. There is no possibility that the populations that displaced rightly or wrongly are going to magically walk back into the places their great-grandparents and grandparents left 65 years ago.
The human rights abuses they experience come at their own hands from corrupt leaders and the Arab states where they have settled. The Israelis have nothing to do with how they are treated in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and elsewhere.
If they woke up one day and said "I want to be Jordanian, Egyptian, whatever," they would be laughed at by those countries. But they have been there for 65 years and it is time for those countries to accept them, rather Israel.
Alternatively, let George Soros and the oil rich Arab states do one final favor for their poor Palestinian relations and buy them a country in Africa and let them do what the Israelis did to build themselves their own success story, unlike the welfare dependent lives they have lived for the past 65 years.
As for me, I have always advocated binding third party arbitration, and there is only two ways forward.
(1) The forced withdrawal of Israel from all lands captured during the 1967&73 wars and set ALL THOSE land aside for a Palestinian State. And in exchange for the right to return, Israel will help finance a viable Palestinian State.
(2) Have Israel accept the forced assimilation of all Palestinians with equal rights and a right to claim to their lands taken in 1948.
When pigs fly.
You put all of the onus on the Israelis, Jews and Arabs and other races, all intermixed and attempting to living in peace amongst themselves.
You claim the current population will have to be somehow "forced out." By whom? And to where?
Am I to understand that your proposal is to forcibly evict the Israelis first. Then they can petition for some of what they have been forced to give up but their "right to return" will be based on how much they fund the population that has displaced them?
Seriously, are you on drugs?
Again, you never have an answer that will make the slightest sense in the realities of that region. Oh, it may come to pass if someone dropped a half dozen or so neutron bombs onto Israel. Barring that, the fate of the millions of people that have built lives in that place for four generations and that your proposals will displace, is completely dependent on that population being willing to be displaced. My personal opinion is that are more likely to die in place than undergo what they experienced before they had an Israel to escape to, but that's just me.
You certainty posture like you are the man with the plan. Again, describe
exactly how this massive population and ownership shift you are proposing is supposed to occur?
If you can't, perhaps you could point me to a plan that someone else has written up in detail, because I certainly have never seen one. It has to be recently written because the whole idea of a separate Palestinian state only started being considered in 1988.
If you can't come up with anything other than some nonsensical "third party arbitration," like it was a landlord/tenant dispute, your premise rests on dandelion fluff.
C'mon, propose
anything that makes sense for the people who have now lived in the State of Israel for 65 years.
Call it the Final Solution. The term has been used before.
Facebook
Twitter