Israel Bombing Footage Part Deux: View From The Ground

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: SamurAchzar
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Text

Be warned, there is nothing enjoyable about a street littered with mangled bodies.

This video was shot sometime in the last few days in Gaza after an Israeli bomb struck a crowded civilian street. Another member on P&N was happy to show us what a laser-guided bomb looked like from a birds-eye view, and now we get to see what the looks like at the ground level. It's always nice to see both sides of the coin.

Lets assume Israel devised a machine that for every rocket shot from Palestinian territory, blindly fires back a cruise missile at the source of the launch. Lets assume it's 100% accurate, but causes complete devastation 100m around the hit spot. Is the use of such a machine acceptable by your divine moral standards?

You are the pathetic mess that will have to answer to your God .. OH CHOSEN PEOPLES LOL
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Yes.. look up Zionist Terrorists who did all they could since the inception of Israel to derail all peace plans

Didn't one of them even kill a great Jewish man named Yitzhak Rabin

So many find the Jews absolutely flawless and more peace promoting that mother theresa herself..
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Kadarin
The Palestinian people voted for Hamas to lead them. No sympathy from me, sorry.

And US citizens voted for bush and the bankers.. no sympathy from me .. and if we all start getting killed someday by Middle Easterners seeking revenge for all the innocents we killed in Iraq.. will you turn a blind eye to that too?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: ZzZGuy
I'm starting to like the idea of a "peace keeping" force, but screw the UN, they are beyond useless unless both sides play nice.

The UN just ca't win with its opponents.

Either they're worried that the UN will act too much on its own and pave the way for some world government, and if it's careful not to, they hate it for not being powerful enough.

Basically, the UN critics are "unintentional imperialists". They think that they want nothing but peace, but they set standards that only their country can have unlimited power and no others are allowed to rival it whatsoever (even to the point of wild speculations about biological weaponry distributed by cropdusters); they forgive virtually *any* violence by their nation and its allies as 'well intentioned' and therefore a good cause. They set the parameters as ones in which their nation working to rule the world is the only practical possibility of the policies, while not in any way recognizing that they are doing so, thinking all the while how 'fair' and 'generous' they are.

The sad thing is, this sort of delusion is seen in most empires, IMO. It's amazing how mythologies crop up easily in countries about why they're entitled to rule the world.

In all cases, it's actually 'for the good of the world'; why, while it's not perfect, jus think how bad it would be if the barbaric other powers ruled instead! Thank goodness!
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Craig234
Response deleted as it was based on not recognizing the apparent sarcasm of Noshangrila.

He was being sarcastic, right?
NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: NoShangriLa

Israel have the right to defend herself, and the provided images are manipulated by the bleeding heart liberal media. Just like the lies that the media painted during the Vietnam War.

Bushshite, Zionnazi Akbar....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Craig234

The voice of evil.

It uses any wrong by one side as license for disproportionate, if not unlimited, wrong by the other.

It takes the clear case in Vietnam of a nation of peasants being oppressed by occupiers - China, France, Japan (during WWII), US puppets - and perversely everses the blame.

It sanitizes the unjustified aggressive murder of two million vietnamese absolving the killer.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Right, bemoaning the deaths of civilians makes people terror apologists.

Right, that was the point of this thread... :roll: Don't be naive.

As you bankrupt yourself morally to choose empire over decency, the little niggling realities how wrong you are have to be beaten down one by one, to fixyour cognitive dissonance. And so you rationalize each bit of reality. Collateral Damage! The fault of the enemy who hid among civilians! The liberal media trying to manipulate you!

It's not easy to look at children who are casualties and dehumanize them, but it's a dirty job and someone has to do it, and that someone is you. They're trying to trick you!
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
^^Wrong ... Unless you think Vietnam was somehow justified.. Care to tell us how many we killed and how many of us were killed.. Epic failure of humanity
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: smack Down

So isn't a navel blockade.

That was in response to rocket attacks that broke the truce. Rockets attacks from a democratically elected government that break a truce is a war act, the naval blockcade was a non-violent measure aimed at stopping the attacks.

This started long before Hamas even existed, Israel has kept strict control over Gaza's watters and airspace since the end of the 1967 war.
[/quote]

That was in response to aggression from the Arab states...
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,437
10,730
136
Originally posted by: smack Down
So isn't a navel blockade.

The people living in Gaza have lived the their whole life under Israel occupation. How exactly did they make their bed.

They can lay down their arms or they can die. That is making their bed.
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: smack Down
So isn't a navel blockade.

The people living in Gaza have lived the their whole life under Israel occupation. How exactly did they make their bed.

They can lay down their arms or they can die. That is making their bed.

While Israel is allowed to bulldoze their house, drops bombs on them from above? Remember, the cease fire ended because Israel provoked it, not the other way around. The rocket attacks came after strikes from Israel.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JS80
There is no such thing as an innocent palestinian, they democratically VOTED IN HAMAS AS THEIR LEADERS!
There is no such thing as an innocent Israeli; mandatory military service means they are all valid targets.
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|



 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JS80
There is no such thing as an innocent palestinian, they democratically VOTED IN HAMAS AS THEIR LEADERS!
There is no such thing as an innocent Israeli; mandatory military service means they are all valid targets.
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|

It's agreed, Israel has the right to kill every palestinian. Let's see if they have the balls.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: brandonb
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: smack Down
So isn't a navel blockade.

The people living in Gaza have lived the their whole life under Israel occupation. How exactly did they make their bed.

They can lay down their arms or they can die. That is making their bed.

While Israel is allowed to bulldoze their house, drops bombs on them from above? Remember, the cease fire ended because Israel provoked it, not the other way around. The rocket attacks came after strikes from Israel.

What crack are you smoking? The rockets attacks never ended, and were continuing since the ceasefire was declared.
 

ZzZGuy

Golden Member
Nov 15, 2006
1,855
0
0
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ZzZGuy
I'm starting to like the idea of a "peace keeping" force, but screw the UN, they are beyond useless unless both sides play nice.

The UN just ca't win with its opponents.

Either they're worried that the UN will act too much on its own and pave the way for some world government, and if it's careful not to, they hate it for not being powerful enough.

Basically, the UN critics are "unintentional imperialists". They think that they want nothing but peace, but they set standards that only their country can have unlimited power and no others are allowed to rival it whatsoever (even to the point of wild speculations about biological weaponry distributed by cropdusters); they forgive virtually *any* violence by their nation and its allies as 'well intentioned' and therefore a good cause. They set the parameters as ones in which their nation working to rule the world is the only practical possibility of the policies, while not in any way recognizing that they are doing so, thinking all the while how 'fair' and 'generous' they are.

The sad thing is, this sort of delusion is seen in most empires, IMO. It's amazing how mythologies crop up easily in countries about why they're entitled to rule the world.

In all cases, it's actually 'for the good of the world'; why, while it's not perfect, jus think how bad it would be if the barbaric other powers ruled instead! Thank goodness!

Wat?

First, who are "they", and second I'm not American if that is why you are implying.

I also hate the UN because of situations like Rwanda, where the UN peace keepers rules of engagement meant that all they could do was stand around and watch as men woman and children where butchered in front of them. Solders had to be rotated out because they where cracking one by one, that is how bad it was for them to stand by and watch. The UN's arms, legs, eyes, ears and tongue are cut off by all the bickering nations that make up the UN so when they finally do something it's often very/too late and so much was compromised on that nothing can be done. Sure they are famous for sending food to starving people (often very late in the game) and peacekeepers that stand around and look pretty, but that is easy stuff. When it gets hard they crumble.

That is why I would want a 3d party that is not bound by the UN's B.S. that can exercise common sense.

 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JS80
There is no such thing as an innocent palestinian, they democratically VOTED IN HAMAS AS THEIR LEADERS!
There is no such thing as an innocent Israeli; mandatory military service means they are all valid targets.
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|

It's agreed, Israel has the right to kill every palestinian. Let's see if they have the balls.

I don't agree with that statement OR jpeyton's terrorist-hugging drivel. You're both wrong.

In order to maintain Western (my) support for their operations, Israel must adhere to the Laws of War. As long as they continue to do so, they will have our support. At the end of the day, this is the primary reason why we will never support terrorists like Hamas... they know no laws beyond Sharia, which is entirely unacceptable in a modern civilized world.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Yes.. look up Zionist Terrorists who did all they could since the inception of Israel to derail all peace plans

Didn't one of them even kill a great Jewish man named Yitzhak Rabin

So many find the Jews absolutely flawless and more peace promoting that mother theresa herself..

Whoa there junior - no where have I stated that Israel has been flawless. However, this thread just like so many others the last day or so are nothing but attempts for some of you to play on people's heart strings and somehow ignore the reality of the situation over there. Yes, innocent people are dying, but do you know how that can all stop? By the terrorists stopping their terrorism. The people of Gaza should stand up to the terrorists if they want the bombings by Israel to stop - it's really that simple. Ofcourse they won't because they've been taught and told to hate Israel. But hey... go ahead and try to continue with the propaganda...just be aware that it doesn't work on rational minded people.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Right, bemoaning the deaths of civilians makes people terror apologists.

Right, that was the point of this thread... :roll: Don't be naive.

As you bankrupt yourself morally to choose empire over decency, the little niggling realities how wrong you are have to be beaten down one by one, to fixyour cognitive dissonance. And so you rationalize each bit of reality. Collateral Damage! The fault of the enemy who hid among civilians! The liberal media trying to manipulate you!

It's not easy to look at children who are casualties and dehumanize them, but it's a dirty job and someone has to do it, and that someone is you. They're trying to trick you!

lol, the only morally bankrupt folks around here are the ones that don't seem to recognize that hamas is a terrorist organization that uses innocent people as "shields" and then plays the propaganda BS when attempts are made to take out the terrorists. It's quite simple as I just told your terrorist sympathizing brother - have them stop firing rockets and blowing themselves up to kill people and Israel will stop trying to kill them.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Right, bemoaning the deaths of civilians makes people terror apologists.

Right, that was the point of this thread... :roll: Don't be naive.

As you bankrupt yourself morally to choose empire over decency, the little niggling realities how wrong you are have to be beaten down one by one, to fixyour cognitive dissonance. And so you rationalize each bit of reality. Collateral Damage! The fault of the enemy who hid among civilians! The liberal media trying to manipulate you!

It's not easy to look at children who are casualties and dehumanize them, but it's a dirty job and someone has to do it, and that someone is you. They're trying to trick you!

lol, the only morally bankrupt folks around here are the ones that don't seem to recognize that hamas is a terrorist organization that uses innocent people as "shields" and then plays the propaganda BS when attempts are made to take out the terrorists. It's quite simple as I just told your terrorist sympathizing brother - have them stop firing rockets and blowing themselves up to kill people and Israel will stop trying to kill them.

Not bothering to repeat myself, since you can't understand the points.

But on the cause of the the rockets, the recent history as I understand it is:

Last June, a 6 month truce was reached. The terms were for Hamas to stop the rocket attacks, and Israel to relax the embargo.

What reportedly happened is that Hamas stopped the rocket attacks, and Isralel did not keep their end of the deal. As time went on, Hamas continued to honor the truce, while Israel never did honor their agreement. As the deadline approached, and Israel said they wanted an extension, Hamas said that they were willing to renew the truce if the embargo ended. When Israel did not agree to that, Hamas said the truce would not be renewed.

After the truce was announced to be over, Hamas, apparently to pressure Israel to agree to the terms, launched many rockets; Israel responded with the invasion.

So, if my understanding is correct, the blame can be put on Israel's failing to honor the agreement on the embargo while Hamas gets credit for honoring the truce during the 6 month period, while Hamas is the nation who chose to renew rocket launches because of the embargo.

You can ask why Hamas thinks they're entitled to launch rockets over an embargo, and you can ask why Israel did not end the embargo.

That seems the basic situation - Israel pointing at the rocket attacks as grounds for war, and Hamas pointing to the ongoing oppression like the embargo as grounds for attacks.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JS80
There is no such thing as an innocent palestinian, they democratically VOTED IN HAMAS AS THEIR LEADERS!
There is no such thing as an innocent Israeli; mandatory military service means they are all valid targets.
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|

The thing to note is your selectivity above and failiure to note how jpeyton was answering with a mirror for the evil JS80, who even you later disagree with
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JS80
There is no such thing as an innocent palestinian, they democratically VOTED IN HAMAS AS THEIR LEADERS!
There is no such thing as an innocent Israeli; mandatory military service means they are all valid targets.
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|
The thing to note is your selectivity above and failiure to note how jpeyton was answering with a mirror for the evil JS80, who even you later disagree with
Well, unlike you, at least I later made it clear that I disagree with both of them.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
How many terrorist apologist threads is this now?

Right, bemoaning the deaths of civilians makes people terror apologists.

Right, that was the point of this thread... :roll: Don't be naive.

As you bankrupt yourself morally to choose empire over decency, the little niggling realities how wrong you are have to be beaten down one by one, to fixyour cognitive dissonance. And so you rationalize each bit of reality. Collateral Damage! The fault of the enemy who hid among civilians! The liberal media trying to manipulate you!

It's not easy to look at children who are casualties and dehumanize them, but it's a dirty job and someone has to do it, and that someone is you. They're trying to trick you!

lol, the only morally bankrupt folks around here are the ones that don't seem to recognize that hamas is a terrorist organization that uses innocent people as "shields" and then plays the propaganda BS when attempts are made to take out the terrorists. It's quite simple as I just told your terrorist sympathizing brother - have them stop firing rockets and blowing themselves up to kill people and Israel will stop trying to kill them.

Not bothering to repeat myself, since you can't understand the points.

But on the cause of the the rockets, the recent history as I understand it is:

Last June, a 6 month truce was reached. The terms were for Hamas to stop the rocket attacks, and Israel to relax the embargo.

What reportedly happened is that Hamas stopped the rocket attacks, and Isralel did not keep their end of the deal. As time went on, Hamas continued to honor the truce, while Israel never did honor their agreement. As the deadline approached, and Israel said they wanted an extension, Hamas said that they were willing to renew the truce if the embargo ended. When Israel did not agree to that, Hamas said the truce would not be renewed.

After the truce was announced to be over, Hamas, apparently to pressure Israel to agree to the terms, launched many rockets; Israel responded with the invasion.

So, if my understanding is correct, the blame can be put on Israel's failing to honor the agreement on the embargo while Hamas gets credit for honoring the truce during the 6 month period, while Hamas is the nation who chose to renew rocket launches because of the embargo.

You can ask why Hamas thinks they're entitled to launch rockets over an embargo, and you can ask why Israel did not end the embargo.

That seems the basic situation - Israel pointing at the rocket attacks as grounds for war, and Hamas pointing to the ongoing oppression like the embargo as grounds for attacks.

Selective history much? Hamas did not stop the rocket attacks. They were infrequent during the truce but they were still launched. Also Israel did infact loosen the embargo but didn't go further due to continued rocket attacks. So again we are back to the terrorists not being able to help themselves in their quest to kill people and didn't stop firing rockets. There was no reason for Israel to open up more than they already had since the terrorists(hamas) had not fully stopped the rocket attacks. Oh, and there was plenty that was getting through despite the propaganda by the Israel haters.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: JS80
It's agreed, Israel has the right to kill every palestinian. Let's see if they have the balls.
They don't.

Originally posted by: palehorse
You'll say or do anything to justify terrorism, won't you?!

fucking sick... :|
I thought military targets were fair game?
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: jpeyton
I thought military targets were fair game?
Of course military targets are "fair game"... but, that is not what Hamas is doing with their rockets, and you know that.

You're either being intellectually dishonest or you're ignorant. Which is it?
 

idiotekniQues

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2007
2,572
0
76
i would say most of the hyper pro-israeli anandtech Zionist contingent here are the same ones that rail against 'religious extremism' - as long as they are brown religious extremists.

but most of those same rabid neo-con foreign policy supporters all have a huge raging hard-on for the israelis.

now israel, the zionist state, was based upon ancient religious doctrine. its entire existance was premised on fanatical interpretation of ancient religious doctrine applied to modern times. you cant get much more religious extremist than that.

so while all progressives denounce religious extremists of the muslim religion, their treatment of women, etc...

the right-wingers, most of them, can decry it out of one side of their mouth, but support the zionist religious extremist state of israel.

all without batting an eye.

double the standards, twice the virtues.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Cry me a river. They choose war and thats what they are getting. War is hell.

BTW- Where were all these threads and intense diplomatic efforts when Israelis were being terrorized for years with ballbearing laden ordnance shot at their cities? The whole purpose to maim and kill children. The whole world is racist against Israelis from my perspective. Europe always been racists and same with the Arabs both two places where Mein Kampf was best seller at one time or another. Perhaps if you put as much effort into condemning the Arab terrorists there would be no need for war, no broken bodies, no bloody streets?