Israel an exception from all rules and regulations

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
From Strk-

"Aye, the '96 attack was eventually connected to Iran - although they still deny it, I believe. And yes, they also support Hezbollah."

If you're going to make such an assertion, you'll need to support it. Links?

And the same for Raildogg-

"Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism"

Terrorism against whom, and who says so?

Terrorism depends on your pov, anyway. From some points of view, the US is the biggest sponsor of terror worldwide, from Guatemala and El Salvador clear to the tip of Chile, not to mention our client state, Israel, and now the terror that 30 million Iraqis feel every time they see American troops in their neighborhood...

it is not that hard to define terrorism in my eyes. if you kill innocent civilians, you are a terrorist. as for Iraq, we are not intentionally killing civilians. that is a totally false assertion. how can it be even close?

the extremist Islamic terrorists kill civilians with the intent of doing so. they want to kill as many as they can. as for El Salvador, Guatemala and other places, yes, that was history. we are talking about the present. Israel is an independant country. they have taken some extreme measures, but I would say they are not quite as extreme as the Palestinian terrorists. but we have our opinions

yes, the bombings in 96 are tied to Iran. so were the bombings in Argentina and other places around the world.
 

imported_Tango

Golden Member
Mar 8, 2005
1,623
0
0
Originally posted by: 486
Originally posted by: Tango
I meant legally... to occupy Iran you would basically need to declare war on it without any reason. The UN council would emarginate the US and this would be the very first step toward a real global system change. Not even a madman would think something like this.
Remember that Iraq was already under UN inspections, so you could find something to work on to get a legitimate excuse to go in. Not so with Iran. Besides, you would then have every single shiite in the world against you. Not that wise.

1. UN council is not capable of emargination of any permanent member of the security council or its close ally.

2. It takes World War to do real global system change.


It would cause a permanent crysis of the UN, and probably it would just end its life. This WOULD BE a major change in the global system.
 

imported_Tango

Golden Member
Mar 8, 2005
1,623
0
0
Originally posted by: 486
Originally posted by: Tango
The problem here is that most people are not able to view things from other perspectives but the limited ones that you can get from your own country, no matter what this country is. International politics is not like that. Each country get a seat at the UN, and the western suspicioness against Iran has exactly the same value of Iran suspicioness over Israel. The same set of international laws apply to the US and the smallest country around.

Many people, expecially in the US, got such a small exposition to the foreign country, either by travelling or getting an international education, that usually forget that in an international court every country has the same rights.

Every country is given the right to rule within its borders, get the energy production facilities it wants and the equip its army in any way it likes. That's it. You know, nobody likes being dependent on some other country, expecially when we are talking about security, defense and energy.

If you want to avoid this (and I DO understand the reasons why) you have to prevaricate ANY international law, and basically become the quintessential rogue state. Is it worth?

1. There are no international laws. Law without enforcement does not exist. Every country acts out of its own interests. Good luck trying to enforce "international law" on USA, Russia or China.

2. If you have a stick, you do not want others to have sticks, because if they do, you cannot use your stick under threat of retaliation.


1- International law exists, and has been enforced on the US, Russia and China many times, expecially on Economic policies. Just think of the foreign steel prices special barriers that US tried to put up a couple of years ago. The WTO considered them against the international trade laws and the US removed them.

Of course you can go against everything. But that would discredit every international institution from the world bank, to the WTO to the UN... it would be global anarchy, and you know.. the financial markets don't like caos that much... Liberal theories here get something right.. no country in the developed world can afford to isolate from the rest of the world and go against international institutions, because of the economic fallout on the markets. Too many links between private companies, and too deep. Realist theories fail to see this, but the age of extreme measures has left us since a long time.

2- I perfectly understand WHY you would want to keep the current nuclear status-quo. I could even agree. But every international law is against this. Of course there are A LOT od other methods to obtain what you want, without having to use that stick. Having the stick usually is enough.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,904
34,019
136
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
From Strk-

"Aye, the '96 attack was eventually connected to Iran - although they still deny it, I believe. And yes, they also support Hezbollah."

If you're going to make such an assertion, you'll need to support it. Links?

And the same for Raildogg-

"Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism"

Terrorism against whom, and who says so?

Terrorism depends on your pov, anyway. From some points of view, the US is the biggest sponsor of terror worldwide, from Guatemala and El Salvador clear to the tip of Chile, not to mention our client state, Israel, and now the terror that 30 million Iraqis feel every time they see American troops in their neighborhood...

it is not that hard to define terrorism in my eyes. if you kill innocent civilians, you are a terrorist. as for Iraq, we are not intentionally killing civilians. that is a totally false assertion. how can it be even close?

The U.S. dropped 2000 lb bombs on and chucked cruise missiles at one of the most densely populated cities on earth and you claim the U.S. wasn't targeting civilians. By that logic, the suicide bombers weren't targeting the shoppers who happened to be in the market when the Iraqi police were there. The only differences between non-terrorist killers and terrorist killers are money and media control. The results are the same - murdered civilians.
 

The Linuxator

Banned
Jun 13, 2005
3,121
1
0
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
From Strk-

"Aye, the '96 attack was eventually connected to Iran - although they still deny it, I believe. And yes, they also support Hezbollah."

If you're going to make such an assertion, you'll need to support it. Links?

And the same for Raildogg-

"Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism"

Terrorism against whom, and who says so?

Terrorism depends on your pov, anyway. From some points of view, the US is the biggest sponsor of terror worldwide, from Guatemala and El Salvador clear to the tip of Chile, not to mention our client state, Israel, and now the terror that 30 million Iraqis feel every time they see American troops in their neighborhood...

it is not that hard to define terrorism in my eyes. if you kill innocent civilians, you are a terrorist. as for Iraq, we are not intentionally killing civilians. that is a totally false assertion. how can it be even close?

The U.S. dropped 2000 lb bombs on and chucked cruise missiles at one of the most densely populated cities on earth and you claim the U.S. wasn't targeting civilians. By that logic, the suicide bombers weren't targeting the shoppers who happened to be in the market when the Iraqi police were there. The only differences between non-terrorist killers and terrorist killers are money and media control. The results are the same - murdered civilians.

That is absolutely well said, ubfortunately many fail to realize that they know nothing just because our media hand picks what they want us to see , hear, and read about.
 

B00ne

Platinum Member
May 21, 2001
2,168
1
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
link

So let me get this straight Iran isn't allowed to have a nuclear power station even though they are saying they welcome inspections at anytime, while Israel here has an estimated 200 nuclear warheads, and everything is ok, and not even one nation in the whole world dared to object.
Who says Iran is not allowed to have a nuclear power station? That's not at issue here. The EU has even offered to help them do it if they comply with the inspections.

Or are they playing the same game of pretend that Saddam did to start something or be belligerent? If so, what's their purpose for such instigation?


Afiak, the problem is not inspections. The problem is the fact that Iran insists on having the complete fuel cycle in their country - making it easy to make and/or hide weapons grade material from the IAEA
 

B00ne

Platinum Member
May 21, 2001
2,168
1
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
From Strk-

"Aye, the '96 attack was eventually connected to Iran - although they still deny it, I believe. And yes, they also support Hezbollah."

If you're going to make such an assertion, you'll need to support it. Links?

And the same for Raildogg-

"Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism"

Terrorism against whom, and who says so?

Terrorism depends on your pov, anyway. From some points of view, the US is the biggest sponsor of terror worldwide, from Guatemala and El Salvador clear to the tip of Chile, not to mention our client state, Israel, and now the terror that 30 million Iraqis feel every time they see American troops in their neighborhood...

it is not that hard to define terrorism in my eyes. if you kill innocent civilians, you are a terrorist. as for Iraq, we are not intentionally killing civilians. that is a totally false assertion. how can it be even close?
Well that is an interesting definition. When you send a cruise missile (or whatever bomb) into a building within residential areas. You do know that you will inevitably kill civilians but you fire off that missile anyway. How far is that from intentionally killing civilians. Just because you say: "oh but we didnt want to"? How hypocrite is that.

That is just like saying: the robber trying to steal a TV at somebodies house being surprised by the owner and then shooting the owner isnt a muderer since it wasnt his original intention to shoot the owner: he just wanted the TV.

Oops I see, sombody already had the same line of thinking as me...
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Your links merely reiterate the accusations against Iran in the 1996 bombing, Strk. They're not proof of any kind, nor valid "linkage"... merely accusations.

It's like dragging out a bunch of pre-invasion statements form the Bush admin about Iraqi WMD's. We all know how much truth there was to those... I can link bigfoot to the unabomber in a similar fashion...

Kinda glossed over Central and South America, there, Raildogg, and the actions of our Israeli friends... not to mention a rather narrow definition of Terrorism. Targeting civilians directly is one kind of terrorism, sending their leaders and passerbys off into the great beyond in a hail of gunfire or missiles or bomb fragments is another. The intended effect is the same, to create a climate of fear. In that respect, an F-15 putting a 2000lb bomb into an Iraqi army barracks in 1996 or 1998 differs little from the truck bomb at Khobar...
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Your links merely reiterate the accusations against Iran in the 1996 bombing, Strk. They're not proof of any kind, nor valid "linkage"... merely accusations.

It's like dragging out a bunch of pre-invasion statements form the Bush admin about Iraqi WMD's. We all know how much truth there was to those... I can link bigfoot to the unabomber in a similar fashion...

Like I said, the information available is quite limited from reliable sources due to it being 9 years old.

And here is another one. I'm not exactly sure why you're so adamant on not wanting to believe what Iran did.
 

Siwy

Senior member
Sep 13, 2002
556
0
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
israel is a liberal democratic country.

HaHaHa...you're such a tool.

Liberal - Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

Democratic - Believing in or practicing social equality.

Israel is a religious state full of bigotry and is definitely not practicing social equality ~ judging by the way they treat Israeli Arabs.


 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Siwy
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
israel is a liberal democratic country.

HaHaHa...you're such a tool.

Liberal - Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

Democratic - Believing in or practicing social equality.

Israel is a religious state full of bigotry and is definitely not practicing social equality ~ judging by the way they treat Israeli Arabs.

Actually, it is. Are they a beacon for the rest of the world? Not really, but by definition, they are a liberal democracy.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
link

So let me get this straight Iran isn't allowed to have a nuclear power station even though they are saying they welcome inspections at anytime, while Israel here has an estimated 200 nuclear warheads, and everything is ok, and not even one nation in the whole world dared to object.

im pretty sure Isreal didn't sign the nonproliferation treaty, so they're not bound by it.
 

Bumrush99

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
3,334
194
106
Stop feeding the troll, for his own good. Linuxator is going to bury himself soon enough.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,904
34,019
136
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Siwy
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
israel is a liberal democratic country.

HaHaHa...you're such a tool.

Liberal - Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

Democratic - Believing in or practicing social equality.

Israel is a religious state full of bigotry and is definitely not practicing social equality ~ judging by the way they treat Israeli Arabs.

Actually, it is. Are they a beacon for the rest of the world? Not really, but by definition, they are a liberal democracy.

Israel is an apartheid regime.
 

Siwy

Senior member
Sep 13, 2002
556
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Siwy
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
israel is a liberal democratic country.

HaHaHa...you're such a tool.

Liberal - Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

Democratic - Believing in or practicing social equality.

Israel is a religious state full of bigotry and is definitely not practicing social equality ~ judging by the way they treat Israeli Arabs.

Actually, it is. Are they a beacon for the rest of the world? Not really, but by definition, they are a liberal democracy.

Your link says that the "quality of liberal democracies include: (first bullet point) A constitution that limits the authority of the government and protects many civil rights"

Yet, Israel has no constitution. :Q






 

The Linuxator

Banned
Jun 13, 2005
3,121
1
0
Why do ppl keep calling Israel the beacon of freedom, I know why , it's because they are ignorant and they live in a bubble made for them by our ZIONIST controled media, here is an example of how undeveloped Israel is .

Jewish immigrants comming from Arethria are classified by the governmet as second class citezens simply for the fact that they claim that those Jews aren't pure race Jews, and they say that the pure race Jews are superior to those black people.
MY MY MY how the tables have turned around the weak poor Jews who were punished brutally for their race by Nazi germany, have turned into a new version of Nazis.

Meanwhile the Arabs that we bash up and down , and call them uncivilized, abolished slavery and racial discrimination almost 1500 years ago, go figure.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Why do ppl keep calling Israel the beacon of freedom, I know why , it's because they are ignorant and they live in a bubble made for them by our ZIONIST controled media, here is an example of how undeveloped Israel is .

Jewish immigrants comming from Arethria are classified by the governmet as second class citezens simply for the fact that they claim that those Jews aren't pure race Jews, and they say that the pure race Jews are superior to those black people.
MY MY MY how the tables have turned around the weak poor Jews who were punished brutally for their race by Nazi germany, have turned into a new version of Nazis.

Meanwhile the Arabs that we bash up and down , and call them uncivilized, abolished slavery and racial discrimination almost 1500 years ago, go figure.
Talk about revisionist history. Are you completely ignorant of the Arab slave trade that went on all the way up until the early 20th century? It's well documentated. Maybe you should do some research on the subject? It's even still going on to this very day by African Arabs.

http://www.frontline.org.za/news/slave_raiders.htm

Saudi Arabia is well known for it's human trafficking, primarily for selling women and children into sexual bondage and forced labor.

Any point you might try to make about the Jews comes off as highly biased, not to mention a overtly paranoid with a hint of hate sprinkled on top.
 

486

Banned
Sep 28, 2005
21
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
it is not that hard to define terrorism in my eyes. if you kill innocent civilians, you are a terrorist. as for Iraq, we are not intentionally killing civilians. that is a totally false assertion. how can it be even close?

the extremist Islamic terrorists kill civilians with the intent of doing so. they want to kill as many as they can. as for El Salvador, Guatemala and other places, yes, that was history. we are talking about the present. Israel is an independant country. they have taken some extreme measures, but I would say they are not quite as extreme as the Palestinian terrorists. but we have our opinions

yes, the bombings in 96 are tied to Iran. so were the bombings in Argentina and other places around the world.

1. Well then, US and UK actions in Middle East fall under your definition of terrorism, because waging modern war is not possible without killing innocent civilians. So, by attacking the country you intentionally kill civilians.

And you do not want to name american soldiers terrorists, do you?

IMHO, modern definition of terrorism is simple: "any attempt of muslim or group of muslims to harm interests, property or citizens of western countries".

Everything else is "unfortunate collateral damage/event of war/single criminal act" (if westerners kill non-westerners) or "freedom fighting" (if non-westerners kill other non-westerners).

2. Some may argue, that 9/11 is history too. It is up to private opinion, what year to take as "history cut off point".

3. Israel is not and never was an independant state.

4. Israel treats arabs better, than most arab states treat arabs.

:clock:
 

Bumrush99

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
3,334
194
106
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Why do ppl keep calling Israel the beacon of freedom, I know why , it's because they are ignorant and they live in a bubble made for them by our ZIONIST controled media, here is an example of how undeveloped Israel is .

Jewish immigrants comming from Arethria are classified by the governmet as second class citezens simply for the fact that they claim that those Jews aren't pure race Jews, and they say that the pure race Jews are superior to those black people.
MY MY MY how the tables have turned around the weak poor Jews who were punished brutally for their race by Nazi germany, have turned into a new version of Nazis.

Meanwhile the Arabs that we bash up and down , and call them uncivilized, abolished slavery and racial discrimination almost 1500 years ago, go figure.
Talk about revisionist history. Are you completely ignorant of the Arab slave trade that went on all the way up until the early 20th century? It's well documentated. Maybe you should do some research on the subject? It's even still going on to this very day by African Arabs.

http://www.frontline.org.za/news/slave_raiders.htm

Saudi Arabia is well known for it's human trafficking, primarily for selling women and children into sexual bondage and forced labor.

Any point you might try to make about the Jews comes off as highly biased, not to mention a overtly paranoid with a hint of hate sprinkled on top.


Chicken, you are wasting your time arguing with Linxuator. His comments and obvious quasi-racist conspiracy theories are welcomed here, while other posters with a more conservative slant on things get banned.
 

The Linuxator

Banned
Jun 13, 2005
3,121
1
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Why do ppl keep calling Israel the beacon of freedom, I know why , it's because they are ignorant and they live in a bubble made for them by our ZIONIST controled media, here is an example of how undeveloped Israel is .

Jewish immigrants comming from Arethria are classified by the governmet as second class citezens simply for the fact that they claim that those Jews aren't pure race Jews, and they say that the pure race Jews are superior to those black people.
MY MY MY how the tables have turned around the weak poor Jews who were punished brutally for their race by Nazi germany, have turned into a new version of Nazis.

Meanwhile the Arabs that we bash up and down , and call them uncivilized, abolished slavery and racial discrimination almost 1500 years ago, go figure.
Talk about revisionist history. Are you completely ignorant of the Arab slave trade that went on all the way up until the early 20th century? It's well documentated. Maybe you should do some research on the subject? It's even still going on to this very day by African Arabs.

http://www.frontline.org.za/news/slave_raiders.htm

Saudi Arabia is well known for it's human trafficking, primarily for selling women and children into sexual bondage and forced labor.

Any point you might try to make about the Jews comes off as highly biased, not to mention a overtly paranoid with a hint of hate sprinkled on top.


OH MY GOD !!!!

Are you setting up an Analogy between Sudan the country that has been under the fire of gangsters for years and years and the super-ultra civilized Israel LOL. BTW those numbers seem to be super inflated in that article, sigh...
Israel in my argument is saying that black Jews are second class citezens and this is proclaimed by them pubicly, I have heared it on the BBC news, one Erethrian Jews in Israel said in an interview with BBC that when he asks about why he is considred a second class citezen, he was told that he and other black immigrants are brought in to Israel to be sacreficed for the white Jews, in other words what he said was that the tell him in his face that he and other black immigrants are brought so that they can be placed in the Israeli army so they can die instead of white Jews, go do your research if you don't believe me.

I have read in an old BBC article how it all started, they got these poor ethiopians that after years of living in Israel are not adapting because they lack things such as education, that forces them to go to the army as the only route to be taken, what do you think ? Did those Jews really bring them to Israel to take care of them they want scapegoats for the army. Israel won't get ppl from the outside without having a certain benefit from them, look at Russian Jewish immigrants these were ppl with wither techincal Educational or even art skills , a different situation huh ?

Have you heared about the African racisim confrence that demanded compensation for slavery but got Sh!t read here, ppl keep telling me that I a keep accusing Israel of a world consipracy everytime I critisize them, but please tell me how could have those weak poor Jews that had no authority to do anything after World War II, have a political influence on every western nation out there and make them feel sorry for things they didn't do while Africans have been perscuted for centuries and basically got nothing from the West and still getting nothing but being sacreficed to the sake of the Jewish / Zionist world domination.

The way I see it they have already achieved their goals, they have grabbed every super- power out there by the balls, and what makes me laugh is that I have to admitt with all honesty that Jews are the smartest ppl ever and no I am not joking, why did I reach this conclusion, well I was thinking about if there was
any super-power out there that didn't have it's balls in the hands of Israel, and then I screamed CHINA, :( only to be dissapointed when I heared about how the Israeli's where backstabbing us by what follows in here, WOW how smart can those ppl be, they are such geniuses that they know that the US domination over the world playground is ending and now they want to start building relations up with China so that by the time the
US wheel hit's a nail they would use the Chineese wheel as a spare BRILLIANT, now I can see why Jews have garnered so much support from the British to get them to invade the MIddle-East and drop them off at Palestine.

And I bet ya guys somone here will call me Anti-Semetic, well let him knock him/her-self out I am Anti-Idiotic.
 

AAman

Golden Member
May 29, 2001
1,432
0
0
1. Israel is a free democracy.
2. It is surrounded by hundreds of millions of muslim fanatics, the equivalent
of the Nazi Party/SS rolled into one. In fact, they are outnumberd approx. 100 to 1
by just the Arabs, who are a fraction of the muslim world
3. Without the nukes, the evil of Islam would rape/destroy them in a heartbeat
4. Iran is a nation of religious psychos without regard for human life whatsoever
5. Israel never signed and cheated on the NPT, they just went and built the badboys
because they faced genocide.
6. Until every muslim nation is civilized (to date, none are) Israel has not just the right, but the necessity to have an independent nuclear arsenal- you think the UN is going to intervene to save them from genocide? LOL, get real
7. oh, since the original poster is utterly ignorant of all history- Israel occupies the Gaza Strip (or did) and the West Bank as the result of defensive wars against muslim attempts at genocide. Israel was quite willing to give territory back for peace like it did with Egypt, Lebanon, and has offered to Syria and the Palestinians. But no logic, facts, or history matter to you.
 

The Linuxator

Banned
Jun 13, 2005
3,121
1
0
Your argument is based on you bias towards Israelis it's supported by no evidence of why should they be there ?
1- The Israeli took the land from the Arabs with the help of the British
2-They have kicked Arabs out of their homes
3- The Arabs have all the right to regain there lands from the Jewish invaders
4- The Arabs don't want every Jew dead, they just want them out of their land and when I say out of their land I mean completly out of the middle-east and back into Europe.
5-Whenever I hear you pro-Zionist ppl arguing for Israel you guys make it look like since the begening of time the Israeli's and the Arabs co-existed, but then the Arabs decided for no reason to attack the Israeli's just for the hell of it. Wrong they invaded Arabic land, they get kicked out of it by Arabs simple logic.
6- "Without the nukes, the evil of Islam would rape/destroy them in a heartbeat"-------> Looks like one of those Zionist attempts to gain world sempathy, hmm didn't I mention before that the "Anti-semetisim" card has been swiped too many times and that the card has maxed out.
7-"Israel was quite willing to give territory back for peace like it did with Egypt, Lebanon"-----> Wow I am amazed by Israel's kindness, but guess what DIPSH!T the land of Lebanon was occupied untill half way through all of it, and they were going to lay there dirty hands on Lebanon's water resevoirs and damms power generators whihc were and still are crucial to Israel, oh I feel so good towards the Israeli's giving back Lebanese land to it's owners, and I feel so grateful for the giving the Egyptians who get there desert back. and the palestenians are so arrogant they should feel very grateful toward Israeli's giving them back there land in fragments.
8- "Israel occupies the Gaza Strip (or did) and the West Bank as the result of defensive wars against muslim attempts at genocide.' stop using the words gennocide and holocaust when you talk about israel, these aren't old WWII weak Jews trying to run away from the Nazis, but these are ppl armed with state of the art technology and WMDs and the last time I have checked when an occupied nation fights back against it's occupiers it's called LIBERATION not GENOCIDE you dumbsh!t.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Why do ppl keep calling Israel the beacon of freedom, I know why , it's because they are ignorant and they live in a bubble made for them by our ZIONIST controled media, here is an example of how undeveloped Israel is .

Jewish immigrants comming from Arethria are classified by the governmet as second class citezens simply for the fact that they claim that those Jews aren't pure race Jews, and they say that the pure race Jews are superior to those black people.
MY MY MY how the tables have turned around the weak poor Jews who were punished brutally for their race by Nazi germany, have turned into a new version of Nazis.

Meanwhile the Arabs that we bash up and down , and call them uncivilized, abolished slavery and racial discrimination almost 1500 years ago, go figure.

zionist controled media? you are really starting to show your true face here and its rather ugly. and you are simply full of it. israeli arabs have always had the most rights or arabs in the middle east. as full citizens they've served on the knesset, in the cabinet, high level foreign ministry posts, and on the supreme court. so anyone that claims apartheid is rather shockingly ignorant of what that really was. its like saying seriously that spraying raid on an ant infestation was like the jewish holocaust. or that your cubical is like african slavery and that your boss is like the white slave master. sorry, you lose your credbility right there. as for your ignorance on the topic of african jews. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Jew
and when Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin proclaimed, "bring me the Ethiopian Jews," in 1977 to open the floodgates to immigration i'm sure that was because of racism :roll: In 1977 30 families came. Between 1977 - 1984, 3000-4000 Ethiopian Jews came to Israel, primarily from the Tigrae region. "Operation Moses" brought another 8,000, mostly from Gonder. During that Aliyah, approximately 4,000 lost their lives in the desert wastes and refugee camps of Sudan. "Operation Solomon" saw another 15,000 Ethiopian Jews reach Israel, and small groups have continued to congregate in Addis Ababa, and immigrate ever since. Today there are approximately 85,000 Ethiopian Jews in Israel, 20,000 of who were born here.

The story of the Ethiopian Jews by no means ends with Aliyah. Their absorption and integration into Israeli society has been a long road of challenges, successes and difficulties. Some of the obstacles they faced were objective ones - such as the dislocation of moving from a developing nation to a modern industrialized one. Others were the products of institutions and authorities - such as the problems the community still faces with regards to religion, education, employment and housing.

The Ethiopian Jews are now counting their second decade in Israel, and their successes surely outweigh the difficulties they have faced. The community is grateful to all those individuals and institutions who were part of their immigration process, and who support them as they integrate into Israeli society. They hope that the process will only grow easier as they go.
http://www.iaej.co.il/pages/history.htm



The way I see it they have already achieved their goals, they have grabbed every super- power out there by the balls, and what makes me laugh is that I have to admitt with all honesty that Jews are the smartest ppl ever and no I am not joking, why did I reach this conclusion, well I was thinking about if there was
any super-power out there that didn't have it's balls in the hands of Israel, and then I screamed CHINA, only to be dissapointed when I heared about how the Israeli's where backstabbing us by what follows in here, WOW how smart can those ppl be, they are such geniuses that they know that the US domination over the world playground is ending and now they want to start building relations up with China so that by the time the
US wheel hit's a nail they would use the Chineese wheel as a spare BRILLIANT, now I can see why Jews have garnered so much support from the British to get them to invade the MIddle-East and drop them off at Palestine.

oh bullsh*t, you bring up china? israels already been slapped by the us for doing business with china. and whats your point anyways? china does business with everyone including the most extremist arab governments. so whats your point? they have their balls in muslim extremist hands too? silly niave boy, china looks out for china first and no one else, they are amoral trading partners. wake up. and anyways why aren't you ranting about chinas killing of a million in tibet and its cultural genocide that continues there to this very day. i'm sorry, but that DWARFS anything the palestinians have suffered. not to mention their sheltering of north korea and its true crimes against humanity.

 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Your argument is based on you bias towards Israelis it's supported by no evidence of why should they be there ?
1- The Israeli took the land from the Arabs with the help of the British

the bullsh*t never stops. they were given a much smaller homeland by the un and the british actually. it was based on population and the land bought by the jews from absentee landlords. and remember that during the early years much of palestinians massive population growth was also due to immigrants since the british allowed unlimited immigration even when they actually blocked all jewish immigration during the peak of the holocaust. its only due to the palestinians rejecting all peace that they lost more land.

2-They have kicked Arabs out of their homes

actually many left because they thought they would give the arab armies an easier time exterminating the jews so they could return to their home+ their jewish neighbors home. there was also the factor of antisemitism. sure..teach your children that jews are evil and drink the blood of children and i'm sure you'll be scared once the tables are turned and its not you who are the regular mob lynching jews. of course they were fearful, their previous conduct and guilt would have made anyone fearful. but just so you know, about the same number of jews were kicked out of their homes in the arab states and had their assetts seized. odd the palestinians weren't given those homes isn't it? and frankly the arab citizens of israel seem to contradict the whole kicking everyone out thing.

3- The Arabs have all the right to regain there lands from the Jewish invaders

oh, so you think its an arab land rights thing, not a palestinian thing. getting a little racist here aren't we? theres immigration and land divisions in much of history because of great wars and empires, its how things work. deal with it. sounds like you are one of those hamas people who believe all of the land should go to the palestinians. and if you want to go back to the whole "regaining land" thing...what do you think the jews claim? so really just sod off with that line of arguement.

4- The Arabs don't want every Jew dead, they just want them out of their land and when I say out of their land I mean completly out of the middle-east and back into Europe.

no, they don't. they just want them to all leave. or die in the process. its basically the same. i could say i don't want you dead, but i want you to move to the moon. if you don't. i shoot or blow you up. be serious. your underlying mindset is showing...and its rather ugly. try as you might to hide your ugly face.

5-Whenever I hear you pro-Zionist ppl arguing for Israel you guys make it look like since the begening of time the Israeli's and the Arabs co-existed, but then the Arabs decided for no reason to attack the Israeli's just for the hell of it. Wrong they invaded Arabic land, they get kicked out of it by Arabs simple logic.

the arabs were happy only when the jewish people had no state and were under their thumbs in various forms of quiet oppression. yes thats the way it was. and of course it wasn't no reason, the arab states didn't want a jewish state even on a tiny scrap of land. they didn't like jews. its religious. and its not invasion, it was immigration. whats new.

6- "Without the nukes, the evil of Islam would rape/destroy them in a heartbeat"-------> Looks like one of those Zionist attempts to gain world sempathy, hmm didn't I mention before that the "Anti-semetisim" card has been swiped too many times and that the card has maxed out.

sorry, just look at the actions of the arab militants and armies. at every chance they had they purposely attacked and shelled civilians. its simply exposes their mindset of hatred and genocide. its historical fact. they seed their populations with hatred and worship of the cult of death. they teach their children with schoolbooks filled with the vilest hatred and even have tv shows where the children are indoctrinated with death. the reality speaks for itself. it happens at all levels of government and media, its no fringe, its the mainstream.
http://www.pmw.org.il/
http://www.edume.org/reports/index.htm
http://soberingup.brinkster.net/ETerrorMovie.html


7-"Israel was quite willing to give territory back for peace like it did with Egypt, Lebanon"-----> Wow I am amazed by Israel's kindness, but guess what DIPSH!T the land of Lebanon was occupied untill half way through all of it, and they were going to lay there dirty hands on Lebanon's water resevoirs and damms power generators whihc were and still are crucial to Israel, oh I feel so good towards the Israeli's giving back Lebanese land to it's owners, and I feel so grateful for the giving the Egyptians who get there desert back. and the palestenians are so arrogant they should feel very grateful toward Israeli's giving them back there land in fragments.

fact is this. they occupied the land of those who would destroy them repeatedly directly and in underhanded ways. it is only just. in return for actual peace. not just recognition of reality that can be wiped out, but an actual right to exist, they willingly gave land back. sharon himself was responsble for bulldozing settlements in the sinai. as for the palestinians. the response of israel to terrorism and war was to punish through settlements. terrorism couldn't go unanswered. frankly it was humane. land or lives? which is worth more to you? well i guess i shoulldn't ask you such a question.:p would you rather they do what the arab states do to snuff out trouble makers? like annhilate entire towns at a time? and frankly you dont get to turn to terror and then keep negotiating for the same conditions, there has to be price to be paid or else it will never end. just imagine if japan or hitler in ww2 just got to say oh we tire of war, we call it off for now, now we demand you stop attacking us and pretend it never happened. bygones?

8- "Israel occupies the Gaza Strip (or did) and the West Bank as the result of defensive wars against muslim attempts at genocide.' stop using the words gennocide and holocaust when you talk about israel, these aren't old WWII weak Jews trying to run away from the Nazis, but these are ppl armed with state of the art technology and WMDs and the last time I have checked when an occupied nation fights back against it's occupiers it's called LIBERATION not GENOCIDE you dumbsh!t.

sorry, the arab leaders speeches to their own people aren't exactly coded. they were calls to genocide, and the arab peoples cheered. the indiscriminate attacks they used and still support are just another sign of this. and the jews aren't weak...well boohoo. oh the evil jew is strong enough to defend himself now, we can't oppress him anymore. oh the shock horror. if you had your way they would be and the resultant genocide would have made you rather happy. and really? liberation? so hitler was just liberating his people from the thumbs of the allies? sorry, not all liberations are valid. when a people make horrible undefendable choices in their struggle they invalidate the whole enterprise. its not acceptable that "liberation" means no holds barred violence. by your line of logic isreals self defence needs would mean they could basically do anything including wiping out the palestinians all together. i mean why not? anything in the name of the cause. stand on the ground you are an you cannot critise israel at all. yet you do. of course you do, its the willfully blind mindset of a hateful irrational bigot.

and since i don't feel like bumping your flame bait i'll edit instead of post.

no not all the land was purchased, but much of what was in the initial partition rejected by the arabs and palestinians was. their choice of violence led to their own suffering and refugee situation. and no, israel didn't have loads of bulldozers then, they were fighting for their lives being attacked on all sides. you have a rather distorted view of history. and the comparison to ny has no bearing. there was no recognized state in the area. it was british occupied territory.