Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
This has been amusing: ISIS burns somebody to death and many liberals respond with a version of "We need to talk more" or let's just re-name them ("Daesh") so they don't seem as scary. Perception is what really counts, no?
Fern
A) Any "liberals" whose opinion actually counts for anything/carries any real weight?
B) Daesh - Bullshit, it wasn't "liberals" who decided that Daesh was an appropriate label for them to "make them less scary". It's use is intended to deny legitimacy of Daesh's claims and even it's existence and it's use started in the Middle East with the people who are fighting against them.
"The name Daesh, according to France24, is a "loose acronym" for "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" (al-Dawla al-Islamiya al-Iraq al-Sham). The name is commonly used by enemies of ISIS, and it also has many negative undertones, as Daesh sounds similar to the Arabic words Daes ("one who crushes something underfoot") and Dahes ("one who sows discord")"
http://theweek.com/speedreads/446139/france-says-name-isis-offensive-call-daesh-instead
A more in depth explanation as to why it offends those creeps:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-daesh-instead-of-isil-for-death-cult-but-why
