Is Visual Studio NET == Visual Studio 6 C++?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
H

hanybanoub

Platinum Member
Aug 11, 2000
2,458
0
0
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to catch up and get into coding again.

I've used Visual Studio 6, coding C++ in the past.

Now w/ Visual Studio NET out, can I use that in place of Visual Studio 6 to code in C++?

Not so much NET apps, but just regular C++/Visual C++ coding till I get into NET.

Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated guys, and girls :)

CHEERS :D
 
H

hanybanoub

Platinum Member
Aug 11, 2000
2,458
0
0
Thanks for your reply Descartes.

I gather that there is no longer a need for Visual Studio 6 if using Visual Studio NET.

Is this correct? What would anyone use VS 6 nowadays then?

CHEERS :)
 
J

jgbishop

Senior member
May 29, 2003
521
0
0
I still use VS6, simply because the version of VS.NET I tried was pure crap. I was truly astonished with how buggy it was. A newer version has come out since then, but I'm sticking with VS 6 for now.

Note: The ClassWizard is no longer a part of VS.NET (just so you know). And there are other similarly annoying new "features".
 
H

hanybanoub

Platinum Member
Aug 11, 2000
2,458
0
0
Thanks for your helpful reply jb :)

What version of VS.NET did you try before?

Can you please tell me what the ClassWizard 'feature' is, and what other 'features' may also be missing?

Should I install both VS.NET and VS 6 then?

CHEERS :)
 
J

jgbishop

Senior member
May 29, 2003
521
0
0
I installed the very first version of .NET that was installed (I think it was .NET 2001). A newer version is available (2002 IIRC), but I'm not sure if there is a newer one than that.

I was just mentioning that the ClassWizard from VS 6 is no longer in VS .NET. The ClassWizard was really helpful when using MFC, as you could quickly add new classes or member methods.

Here is an opinionated piece from a Microsoft MVP, on why you should not use VS.NET. Pretty interesting: Bob Moore on Not Using VS .NET

Remember that this is an opinion piece, but I agree with several of his points. I have not tried the latest version of .NET, so it may have been improved. But I'm sticking with VS 6 for now. I don't think you can have both versions of VS installed (unfortunately). Things get messed up, IIRC, and that's never a good thing.

VS 6 has its problems (a conflict with Norton Anti-virus can occasionally cause problems, even causing you to lose your work!), but I think it's great for my purposes (writing programs in Visual C++ and MFC). A generic programming alternative is Visual Slickedit (link). It is a much better editor than VS, but it doesn't have the resource editor and a few other useful features that VS has.

Six one way, half a dozen the other. :confused:
 
H

hanybanoub

Platinum Member
Aug 11, 2000
2,458
0
0
Thanks again jb this is great info :)

I will read more about this.

Odd that both VSes can't be installed at the same time though!

Not very MS-like ;)
 
EagleKeeper

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: hanybanoub
Thanks again jb this is great info :)

I will read more about this.

Odd that both VSes can't be installed at the same time though!

Not very MS-like ;)
Click to expand...

I have developed on a system that had both packages on it.

Biggest problem was the VS.Net was installed afterwards.

If I accidently double clicked on a source file in explorer, the .Net IDE would come up. And it was SLOW to get rolling.
 
B

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
Wow, damn, call me an anti-MS zealot, but I'm just a bit overwhelmed here.

I'm reading a webpage written by a windows programmer, talking about how he codes things by clicking on dialog boxes. He describes his disgust for the newest MS IDE (he's probably right - I wouldn't know), and instead promotes an IDE that is some 5(?) years old, and is notorious for not supporting modern C++ features. All the while I'm reading this on a page generated by FrontPage, which has a title of "Why You Shouldn"

Wow. :Q
 
J

jgbishop

Senior member
May 29, 2003
521
0
0
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Wow, damn, call me an anti-MS zealot, but I'm just a bit overwhelmed here.

I'm reading a webpage written by a windows programmer, talking about how he codes things by clicking on dialog boxes. He describes his disgust for the newest MS IDE (he's probably right - I wouldn't know), and instead promotes an IDE that is some 5(?) years old, and is notorious for not supporting modern C++ features. All the while I'm reading this on a page generated by FrontPage, which has a title of "Why You Shouldn"

Wow. :Q
Click to expand...

True. As I noted, this is an opinion piece, so take it with a grain of salt. The interface for setting variables is indeed clunky. And yes, VS 6 is certainly aging. But I know that everything I need is certainly covered by VS 6, so I'm sticking with that for now. Just my 2 and 1/2 cents. :)
 
O

oog

Golden Member
Feb 14, 2002
1,721
0
0
VS6 comes with VB6, which is very different from VB.NET. That would be one reason you might stick with VS6. That being said, the C++ support in VS.NET is supposed to be more standards compliant. I haven't had trouble with VS.NET 2002 or VS.NET 2003 using VB, C# or C++.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom