HP has invested millions of dollars into a video conferencing technology that displays live 3D personnel on the opposite end of the communication spectrum, using cameras, sensors and very high quality audio systems.
How much does it cost, half a million? But why does it matter to consumers?
Military firms and large corporations that have access to big toys will eventually make it available to consumers in the near future, in some way, shape or form, trickling down to the essentials to what consumers may have use for, or be embedded in new technologies as functionality to improve what we already currently consider mainstream.
As 4G becomes more mainstream, bandwidth will become much less of an issue overtime, allowing phones to have access to much, much more information and have many more features than what a typical user may ever need on a communication device.
Psychology, sociology and business research has become so advanced to the point, where if a marketting campaign was launched to make something hype, it may just sell...
(teen generation brainwashing techniques and skillful ad support from big companies, etc.)
Honestly, do I really give a fvck about video conferencing for personal use(?), no.
If your MBA team had to utilize modern technology to build a case study or connect with other scholars and businesses around the world, you can damn well bet that video technology will be greatly factored in, as to maintain a level of professionalism.