Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Prop. 13 has to go. It's unfair. Why should people who just bought a house pay a lot more taxes than someone who has an identical house, even if they make same money.
Can't afford taxes? Too bad. Sell and move to an area you can afford. Don't expect someone who just moved in to pay your share.
Ok guy builds a mall a mile from your house. You property value doubles your payment increases by 300 a month. You should just move.
No, the guy who buys a house next to you should pay your share of estate taxes, even if he has the same house.
He is getting screwed on buying a house that is more expensive, and paying higher property taxes. You are getting a sweet deal of appreciation on your house, without having to suffer the side effects of that appreciation. It's an unfair law. It has to go.
And yes, if you can't afford property taxes on your house, you need to move. At least you are making out like a bandit on the appreciation.
If I had the conifdence that the state would run around reassesing houses whenever then needed a few million more to hand out for health care for illegal aliens I would be all over repealing it. When I get that assurance you can call me but no until.
Prop 13 has done exactly what it is supposed to do. It allow people to stay in their homes over time.
So until then you are fine with having people who just got raped on buying a house also getting raped subsidizing someone else's share of property taxes, while the guy whose net worth has grown through appreciation seats back and leeches off his newly moved in neighbors?
Why is it that some people have no problem taxing the hell out of someone because they "can afford it"
If I choose to stay in the same house for multiple years chances are I am a benifit to my neighborhood. Yes I may have had an appreiation on my property but why should I be taxed on that until it is realized? If tommorow my house that I paid 115K for 2 years ago was worth 250K I would actually be worst off then I am today. My taxes in MN would go through the roof due to the nature of MN's "PROGRESSIVE" propertyu tax structure.
I would begin paying a larger amount of taxes and what addition gain would I have? NONE. And while you may say well just sell and realize the gain there is a small problem with that logic.
IF my house suddenly doubled in value wouldn't also the houses in my area also rise. I should uproot my family just because I had the luck to buy a little lower. This actually hurts property value rather than helps it.
The people that prop 13 helps for the most part are thoose living on fixed incomes and retirees. My parents would have lost there house had it not been for prop 13. and when they do decide to move they will pay dearly through the nose on capital gains tax seing as the first house they purchased was aroung 12K they will have a "gain" of almost 400K. If sopmeone wants to save and make a house a "home" they should not be driven out of there house. Hasn't anyone in california noticed the bussiness running for there lives out of state and setting up shop in Nevada or for the love of god South Dakota:Q Why is it that south dakota is now a better place to run a bussiness. The weather sucks, the people do not have the education level and did I mention the weather sucks?
The state drove theese companies out with the heavy handed regs and taxation that have driven that state close to the brink.
Do do it to your citizens as well/.