Are you in a league with people you know, or just an online league.
Our Commish is my gf's brother, and he has a very strict, "If you veto a trade, you have to explain to him why you veto voted" rule. He doesn't allow just, "Well, I don't like it. It'll make so and so stronger.".
It has to be something like collusion for a veto to stand. Otherwise he overrides it.
I don't see any reason for your trade to be vetoed.
Some are pretty i know and some are people i know off/thru other people. We picked up 3 last minute guys cause people dropped out. This is a sub $100 league.
I dont see why a veto was to come, on the surface a guy giving up gore/amdeola looks like he is trading away his team. While i'm getting those two key guys and i'm coming up on top, i'm not stealing anything from anyone. As of right now its a fair trade, going forward it might not be. I let it be.
Commish changed the rules for week4 and going forward to that similar to what you say, you have to speak as to why you want this vetoed. I asked people to speak up as to why it was vetoed, * crickets* LOL. In some cases I can aruge i'm giving up too much. Gore's sub-par performance and injury prone player for 3 guys performing great.
It got vetoed TWICE. I gave up on it. Little pissed because i COULD have an insane team going into the playoffs (if all went well). 12 man PPR with dez,fitz,garcon, Charles and gore as the backs and amdeola/lamar miller/Monte Ball as my flex. I currently have a good TE tho in pettigrew but it would of been a MONSTER team.
Guy with gore needs a WR bad so he is going after Wes now.