I'd say the advice in prior posts is pretty much in the ballpark.
With the competition in the motherboard market, we can find that the rule of "getting what you pay for" applies.
I always keep my eye on the low-end boards because I "build and maintain" for mainstream users of the fam-damn-ily.
You might find some shortcomings in how far you can over-clock a system, and I find that the low-end boards have a simpler phase-power design than those which cost more. But from what I've read in the forums here over the last five months, you won't be too much disappointed at over-clocking performance if you had in mind the "get what you pay for" imperative from the beginning.
And actually -- that board is a mid-range ASRock. It's only got a low-end price in the Amazon ad.