Is this something to be proud of?

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Childless woman, 66, becomes oldest in the world to give birth to triplets after IVF treatment

Last updated at 7:21 PM on 14th June 2010


A 66-year-old Indian woman has become the oldest person in the world to give birth to triplets after IVF treatment at a controversial centre.
Childless Bhateri Devi gave birth to two boys and a girl - who are now being treated in intensive care after being born dangerously underweight.

Mrs Devi received IVF treatment at the National Fertility Centre in Haryana - where the world's oldest mother, Rajo Devi Lohan, was also treated.

article-0-0A06CAB5000005DC-778_468x392.jpg
Controversy: Bhateri Devi gave birth to two boys and a girl after receiving IVF treatment at the National Fertility Centre in Haryana

However, the doctors said the triplets, weighing 2lb 6oz, 2lb 4oz and 1lb 7oz, were being monitored in the intensive care unit of the centre.


More...



Mrs Lohan, 72, who gave birth 18 months ago aged 70, has today revealed she is dying - and hit out at the centre for not explaining the risks to women about having babies later in life.

However, officials at the centre proudly boasted of their latest achievement.

article-0-0A06CB34000005DC-928_468x364.jpg

Intensive care: The two boys and a girl are being treated at the National Fertility Centre after they were born underweight

Dr Anurag Bishnoi, who supervised Mrs Devi's treatment, said: ‘According to the birth certificate issued by a government hospital in Rohtak district, Bhateri Devi was born on May 21, 1944, in Madina village of Rohtak.
‘This birth is authentic and therefore she has become the oldest mother in the world to give birth to triplets so far.
‘Bhateri Devi was coming to us for the last months for the treatment. She has become a mother for the first time and conceived only in our third attempt through IVF technique.

article-0-0A06C86A000005DC-929_468x411.jpg

Tiny: The triplets were born weighing 2lb 6oz, 2lb 4oz and 1lb 7oz

article-0-0A066EEF000005DC-581_233x333.jpg
Unwell: Rajo Devi Lohan, pictured with her baby daughter Naveen in 2008, has revealed today she is dying

‘For the first two attempts, only two embryos were transferred in each cycle.

'But in the third attempt three embryos were transferred in her uterus, resulting in the birth of three children by caesarean.’

Mrs Devi's husband of 44 years, Deva Singh, 64, said he was ecstatic at becoming a father for the first time.
‘Bhateri has fulfilled my dream of having a child and gave my family an heir.' he said.
'She was my first wife and after she failed to conceive a child, I married twice but again I did not have any child from my other wives also.
‘I am very happy and I will provide all the best facilities to my children in the coming years.'
In November 2008, 70-year-old Mrs Lohan made headlines after she gave birth to a girl through IVF technique at the same centre.
She and husband Balla, 73, are uneducated farmers who say they did not understand the risk of having a baby at such an old age.


 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Ugh, so wrong. So they will be orphans in what, 10 years give or take? Makes me sick. :thumbsdown:

KT
 

bommy261

Golden Member
Dec 17, 2005
1,057
0
76
sometimes i hate people, this is no exception. why would they even try at such an old age? children born to older mothers have a much higher risk of birth defects. and now they will be motherless. DuH! wtf u think was going to happen?

they will be in foster care by age 5 or worse.
 

ahenkel

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2009
5,357
3
81
Its not the age so much that bothers me hell if you can get pregnant the old fashioned way at 66 thats fine. Its the whole multiple IVF attempts and the fact the clinic is basically just using her almost dusty womb to break records that irks me.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
The centre conned them into doing it for the publicity and prestidge that the centre would obtain.
 

SandEagle

Lifer
Aug 4, 2007
16,809
13
0
yes. she has given the world a .NET developer, a taxi driver, and a DELL customer service rep.

what have u contributed?
 

InflatableBuddha

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2007
7,416
1
0
Ugh, so wrong. So they will be orphans in what, 10 years give or take? Makes me sick. :thumbsdown:

KT

sometimes i hate people, this is no exception. why would they even try at such an old age? children born to older mothers have a much higher risk of birth defects. and now they will be motherless. DuH! wtf u think was going to happen?

they will be in foster care by age 5 or worse.

The centre conned them into doing it for the publicity and prestidge that the centre would obtain.

All of the above. Disgusting.

Note the last sentence in the OP where it says they're uneducated (I admit I assumed so even before I read to the end). Not a huge surprise.

Education (especially for women) is the single biggest investment developing nations can make. Contraception usage increases, and if women choose to become pregnant, they do so at younger ages, when there is less risk of complications.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
doesnt india have enough people? maybe they should start a 1 child program like china.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,501
47,956
136
Just when I thought India couldn't obtain something even more unnecessary than a space program, I read this and see the country set to soon overtake China for most populous country has friggin fertility clinics.

Gee, too bad there aren't lots of orphans living in squalor in India, she could have adopted and made a difference instead of dooming these infants to go through the loss of a parent at an early age.

Oh ..wait....
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,892
10,713
147
Why are they wrapped in newspaper like some cheap knock-off?

Possibly appropriate low tech? Opinions diverge, but many people believe that newsprint is reasonably sterile, which is probably why in days past even in the USA your fresh fish from the fish monger was wrapped in it.

Hell, when I was in England in the seventies they would still give you your chips (freedom or french fries to us) in a cone made of newspaper at the fish and chips shops.
 

MJinZ

Diamond Member
Nov 4, 2009
8,192
0
0
Possibly appropriate low tech? Opinions diverge, but many people believe that newsprint is reasonably sterile, which is probably why in days past even in the USA your fresh fish from the fish monger was wrapped in it.

Hell, when I was in England in the seventies they would still give you your chips (freedom or french fries to us) in a cone made of newspaper at the fish and chips shops.

Fascinating. I thought people used (outdated) Newspaper because they are usually free (thrown out).