Googer
Lifer
Originally posted by: Tostada
I certainly wouldn't call it "best bang for the buck." That CPU and video card are "a lotta bang for a lotta buck."
Like others have said, I'd go with the Venice A64, or get a San Diego if you want something nicer.
I have to disagree with people saying the NEC is better than the Pioneer. That's just not true. For $3 more the Pioneer is significantly faster in many things, especially ripping movies, ripping audio, and burning DL. 12X (dual-layer) and 16X (single-layer) ripping vs. 5X on the NEC is a huge difference. The NEC doesn't support 6X DL burning, and doesn't support DVD-R DL at all. The Pioneer doesn't have as many good reviews simply because it's a newer drive (and because you have to flash it to an A09 to get the faster ripping and quieter operation). I've expained this ad nauseam in a couple other recent threads, though, so I'll shut up.
...except to say that the NEC is just plain old and if you want an NEC you should wait a couple weeks for the 3540A.
San Diego is the Next FX chip and will bust his budget. I would not recommend it to him. Stick with the 3000+ or 3200+ Venice it is on or above PAR performance. An FX won't give him that much extra performance, it's not worth the wait. Wating for new technology to arrice is fruitless buy what is here and now.Like others have said, I'd go with the Venice A64, or get a San Diego if you want something nicer.
My NEC drive is a POS, it blows. I would Agree with you when it comes to Pioneer and would Add Plextor to my recomendations. both drives are of very high quality design, manufacture, and construction.