Is this right?

[SandyM]

My computer seems to be on strike - or at least on a work slow-down. I may be on the wrong section to ask this but hoped I might get an answer here - Do these numbers look right?

​

ID : 1910954
Submitted by I52500K-PC | Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:51:54 +0200 | Validated by CPU-Z 1.58


Intel Core i5 2500K
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 (Build 7601)
CPU Arch : 1 CPU - 4 Cores - 4 Threads
CPU PSN : Intel Core i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz
CPU EXT : MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2), EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX
CPUID : 6.A.7 / Extended : 6.2A
CPU Cache : L1 : 4 x 32 / 4 x 32 KB - L2 : 4 x 256 KB
CPU Cache : L3 : 6144 KB
Core : Sandy Bridge (32 nm) / Stepping : D2
Freq : 1596.4 MHz (99.77 * 16)

MB Brand : Gigabyte
MB Model : Z68X-UD3P-B3
NB : Intel Sandy Bridge rev 09
SB : Intel ID1C44 rev 05

GPU Type : Radeon HD 6870
DirectX Version : 11.0

RAM : 8192 MB DDR3 Dual Channel
RAM Speed : 798.2 MHz (1:6) @ 9-9-9-28
Slot 1 : 4096MB (12800)
Slot 1 Manufacturer : G.Skill
Slot 2 : 4096MB (12800)
Slot 2 Manufacturer : G.Skill

CPU-Z Forum Banner (BB Code below)

CPU-Z Validator 3.2 - Copyright 2005-2010 (c) Samuel D. / Franck D. - Visit us at http://www.canardpc.com/ / cpuid.com

Thanks for your time - I really appreciate any help I might get.

 

[GammaLaser]

Your CPU is going into a low-power mode, you need to add more CPU load (e.g. a stress test) if you want to see your CPU running at advertised speeds.

 

[Gigantopithecus]

Did you read this thread? It's stickied at the top of the forum. 😛

 

[BonzaiDuck]

Just a humorous comment . . .

I had missed the Nehalem bandwagon and the socket 1155 wave on the P67 point-break. [Pray-uzz JEE-sus! for there are advantages as well as disadvantages for "falling behind." On that theme -- "the last . . . . shall be first . . . . and the first . . . . shall be last . . "]

And THAT humor aside . . . .

What I've seen since ordering my Z68 board on June 1 . . . a gaggle of folks -- "senior over-clockers" -- in a frenzy to come up to speed on these bad boyz. . . . "Whoa! Let's not move to fast there! Be-e-e-eee CARE-ful!!" I was saying it myself . . . .

Remarks like "Z68 . . . sockt-1155 . . . 'not for enthusiasts'." But some "enthusiasts" were ringing the bell like the Germans on D-Day: "Die Englische Shiffen!! Die Englische Shiffen!!"

On the one hand -- your "Ron Popeil set-it-and-forget-it" features. On the other hand, my experience, sans any socket 1366 hands-on time; a desire to get started; a temptation to "fiddle" with stuff too early. Coming up to "just enough" speed, I ran the OC-Tuner. Put in a couple tweaks. Looked at the six-month-old CPU-Z software version and wondered: "Where's the beef?! Where's the beef?!"

And there was this little voice inside, saying "If you panic and start d***ing around with this, the horses will get out of the corral . . . . " So I pondered for three days. I read the manual which we all hate. I looked for answers on the web like Diogenes or the Three Wise Men.

And after the three days . . . I got out of bed . . . . just by accident chose to run the ASUS monitor showing "frequency" instead of the old CPU-Z and a seeming flaky several-months-old version of CoreTemp [the temps were still believable, even so . . ] Pulled up PRIME95.

"This was working three DAYZZZZ ago!!!!"

Ummm. Three days . . . got out of bed. I suppose you could say I "rose again."

 

[Borealis7]

i'm sorry man, your posts are about as coherent as Tweakboy's...

 

[guskline]

Download Intel Turbo Boost Technology monitor 2.0 from the intel website. It will show the true speed.
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Det...0A&DownloadType=Utilities, Tools and Examples