Is this pic real? I found it on 4chan. SFW

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
Yeah, there's no way a jet could possibly be out of frame. No way. idiot

You're a fucking idiot. Do you know what a jet is... BESIDES an airplane? Only an idiot would assume the incorrect definition of jet in that sentence in relation to this topic.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Yeah, a bomb falling at hundreds of MPH is going to be clearly visible like that by a photographer running from it.

You guys are laughable.

do you know a thing about photography? the photographer took a still shot, he wasnt running.
 

bommy261

Golden Member
Dec 17, 2005
1,057
0
76
i've been shot at with rockets in iraq, and believe me, u have absolutely no time to react, other than hit the ground if you hear a rocket.. once you hear it, its almost too late. they would have no time to look up and run away.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
The problem is the fins arent deployed. The pic of the bomb is an unarmed one. In flight it should have much bigger fins sticking out of the back

laser_guided_gbu-24-300x242.jpg

there are several different paveway bombs made. the pic you posted is not the same type of bomb that is in the OP's pic.

here is a nice link from the first page. http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/188079.php

here are pics of different paveway bombs. notice the paveway1 looks very much like the one in the OP.

http://www.vectorsite.net/twbomb_05_07.png
 
Last edited:

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
You dont need 4 chan. Just do a Google Image (large) for "shaving cream", you will find it.

Is this it? It's the first thing that looks mildly disturbing in the first 3 pages of google images

shaving%20cream%20mess%202.jpg


I too use a lot of shaving cream when I shave my breasts.
 

joesmoke

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 2007
5,420
2
0
Is this it? It's the first thing that looks mildly disturbing in the first 3 pages of google images

shaving%20cream%20mess%202.jpg


I too use a lot of shaving cream when I shave my breasts.

I wonder how many X's before the L on her wolf shirt...
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
I need the source image please not his resized shit. Why resize for that matter. Browser does it for you.
 

theflyingpig

Banned
Mar 9, 2008
5,616
18
0
More pathetic propaganda posted by the liberal media to anger liberal fools. Anyone with any knowledge of modern military weapons can identify that as a fake in seconds. It is clear that the fool who created this propaganda knows nothing, and the fools who believe it know nothing. Everyone knows this.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
More pathetic propaganda posted by the liberal media to anger liberal fools. Anyone with any knowledge of modern military weapons can identify that as a fake in seconds. It is clear that the fool who created this propaganda knows nothing, and the fools who believe it know nothing. Everyone knows this.

PIG!
Where was ya, man? We was waitin for ya!
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
More pathetic propaganda posted by the liberal media to anger liberal fools. Anyone with any knowledge of modern military weapons can identify that as a fake in seconds. It is clear that the fool who created this propaganda knows nothing, and the fools who believe it know nothing. Everyone knows this.

i hope this is sarcasm but if its not,

what do you know about military weapons?
 

joesmoke

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 2007
5,420
2
0
i hope this is sarcasm but if its not,

what do you know about military weapons?

New here huh? Well, let me be the first to welcome you to anandtech off topic. Few if any of us hope that you enjoy your stay.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,979
1,178
126
People in a war torn country, it's not like it could be possible they're running due to something else bad happening and a bomb just happens to get dropped while they're running? I'm not an expert on pixels so I don't fucking know. I do know if this picture was taken in San Fransisco I'd say it's pure BS. But considering where it was taken it could very well be legit.
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
*** Searching Compression Signatures ***

Signature: 01DADDC4908E9BA57CC067EEAD54E67D
Signature (Rotated): 01DADDC4908E9BA57CC067EEAD54E67D
File Offset: 0 bytes
Chroma subsampling: 1x1
EXIF Make/Model: NONE
EXIF Makernotes: NONE
EXIF Software: NONE

Searching Compression Signatures: (3327 built-in, 0 user(*) )

EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?
------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------
SW :[Adobe Photoshop ] [Save As 12 ]

Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:

ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited

This photo was edited in Photoshop. This does not mean the bomb was added, but that's likely the edit. This is why I needed the source (at least as far as we know).
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
both pics are 'shopped.

biggest thing that sticks out to me, aside from relatively impossible photography, is shouldn't there be fins deployed on the back of that bomb?

not to mention its freaking huge considering the distance it should be from the camera:p
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
It's fake. From the link posted earlier.

The Jawa Report said:
Last update (I hope): I guess since I control the blog, I control the parting shots. EODDan in the comments (for those of you too lazy to scroll through them, which is pretty much every one, including myslef normally):

I'm a military Explosive Ordnace Disposal technician. I've seen lots of bomb and lots of bombs being dropped (both in person and in testing videos). I concur with the previous poster about this photo being of a GBU (Guided Bomb Unit). Further, it appears to be a package installed on a 500lb Mk82 bomb. Once the GBU is installed on a particular bomb it gains the appropriate digits 10, 12 etc. I'd have to look at tech data to tell you precisely what the nomenclature of the pictured bomb is, but I can tell you that this picture is bogus. For the fins to still be folded the bomb would have to have just been dropped. You'd still be able to see the plane that dropped it. This would however account for the clarity of the image. A bomb dropped on a combat target, even one dropped at very low altitude, would still be blurred. We're talking about jet fighters here, not biplanes. I've watched test video taken by scientists with high speed cameras designed for the purpose of studying bomb impacts. Even their film comes out blurred sometimes. Also, the scale is definitely off as yet another commenter mentioned. The blast in other fauxtoes is yet another fakery. The apparent blast seat is not in line with impact point you would expect from the previous picture. The blast itself does not look right for a heavy cased bomb either. It looks very much like the result you would get from a bare charge placed on the surface. Finally, as another astute commenter pointed out, neither the fauxtographer or his subjects would have been likely to survive the blast in the image. The blast wave would have knocked them all off their feet and caused serious injuries, but not before they had all been ripped to shreds by primary and secondary fragmentation. In spite of what Hollywood (and Paliwood) would have you believe, it is not possible to outrun a high order explosion.

If the bomb was as close as to the photographer as it seems given the bomb's known dimensions and apparent size, the photographer would have been unable to take the second shot of the "explosion" because he would have either been knocked to the ground or dead.