I bought ATI's All in Wonder X800XT card which has 256Mb of GDDR3.
I have one of theearly AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors that clocks at 2.0 ghz
I have 512MB of DDR400.
Performance:
Quake 4 played at medium quality at 800x600 resolution with Anti Aliasing off lags for about 10-20 seconds every time i enter a room, sometimes longer. I wouldn't mind if it were a second delay but it seems rediculous to sit and wait for that long. When it lags, my machine isn't making any extra noise (in fact it's silent) when lagging. When i click on Quake 4 "detect automatic settings" which allows q4 to judge the settings, it says i should run it at 640x480 on low quality. This seems absurd. Is quake 4 really that demanding or is something wrong with my machine? I'm considering upgrading my processor and ram if those are bottlenecking my video card. What do you all think?
P.S. I'm new to your forums but have noticed the expert information displayed on your site. I would greatly apreciate any feedback from you all.
thanks,
Anthony
I have one of theearly AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors that clocks at 2.0 ghz
I have 512MB of DDR400.
Performance:
Quake 4 played at medium quality at 800x600 resolution with Anti Aliasing off lags for about 10-20 seconds every time i enter a room, sometimes longer. I wouldn't mind if it were a second delay but it seems rediculous to sit and wait for that long. When it lags, my machine isn't making any extra noise (in fact it's silent) when lagging. When i click on Quake 4 "detect automatic settings" which allows q4 to judge the settings, it says i should run it at 640x480 on low quality. This seems absurd. Is quake 4 really that demanding or is something wrong with my machine? I'm considering upgrading my processor and ram if those are bottlenecking my video card. What do you all think?
P.S. I'm new to your forums but have noticed the expert information displayed on your site. I would greatly apreciate any feedback from you all.
thanks,
Anthony