• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is this believable story by Donna Brazile?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
boomerang said:
Has the DNC realized that the timing is right to tear down the Clinton dynasty? That they have an opportunity right now to make them go away forever? Or, is this all a smoke screen in an attempt to get ahead of what's coming down the legal pipe for the Clinton machine that will affect the party as a whole? Could be some of both. When Hillary gets cornered and it appears she will, there will be a shortage of buses to throw people under. She'll take a lot of people with her. The victim mentality that is such a huge part of her psyche along with the survival instinct will lead her to expose anyone and everyone in a manner she thinks could save her.

Brazile has jumped the sinking ship and Warren jumped after her. There will be more. Democrats that want to continue feeding at the public trough that are smart enough to understand what is actually happening in the nation will eventually figure out that survival will entail getting out ahead of a lot of things and finely honing some lies such that they are perceived to have moved drastically to the right.

Big donors being exposed in big ways to be sexual predators and pedophiles is bad for the party in the public eye. The base can justify anything that is done, spoken or instigated by anyone that is not a conservative. But the base can't win them elections.

We got the President we needed at the exact right time we needed him. Isis, the economy, jobs, it's wonderful to see what can happen when progressive ideology is kicked to the curb with extreme prejudice.

Sure, and huffpo said the day before the election that there was a 98% chance that Hillary would win. Hope springs eternal but it's sad to see it fertilized with idiocy.
Click to expand...

So the dems have the evil Harvey Weinstein, sure.

The repubs have their entire media arm crumbling under the same insidious predatory, rape culture. Hell, they even elected a rapist for president because "he seems cool with it?" You can't make this shit up.

I'm sure people will join in your concern of the democrat rapists when you acknowledge your own vile tolerance of such people on your team.

by the way, what has your president actually done about any of these things that you claim he has done?
 
UglyCasanova said:
You said she didn’t need the DNC, what was yours?
Click to expand...

yes but use your time machine and say that Hilary is running for President and because the DNC will not agree to her terms she runs as an independent. How many Democrats that would have voted for her are now suddenly deciding to vote a different candidate?
 
JimKiler said:
yes but use your time machine and say that Hilary is running for President and because the DNC will not agree to her terms she runs as an independent. How many Democrats that would have voted for her are now suddenly deciding to vote a different candidate?
Click to expand...

We know the results, Hillary would have received more votes than Bernie, period. What would have happened had Bernie ran as an independent or Hillary for that matter, is that they both would have lost to trump by an even larger margin and neither would have received more votes than trump like Hillary did. The end result would have been the same.
 
ivwshane said:
Hillary has also spoken about it publicly (not necessarily about the deals specifics but of the infrastructure she received and had to prop up).

This is a nothingburger and should be obvious to anyone who can see what people are discussing this (hint its mostly trump supporters).
Click to expand...

It seems like another dot in the connection between Clinton, the DNC, and Russians. Seems like another possible vehicle to launder money from Russia or sidestep campaign finance laws. Considering the recent revelations about Fusion GPS and Uranium One investigation, I would say the former. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670
 
brandonbull said:
Then why are you asking for more Trump-Russia collusion investigations?
Click to expand...
I don't believe I've asked for more, nor is it necessary for me to, because the Mueller investigation is rapidly leading to a satisfying result. I don't need Congress to further politicize things.

The Clinton story is satisfying only because the Clintonista waterboys continue to apologize for the increasingly evident incompetence of the DNC and her campaign.
 
brandonbull said:
And you haven't even posted that much. Good job. Same lackadaisical attitude help cost Clinton and the Dims the election(s).
Click to expand...

You are right, when it comes to cheerleading and carrying water for "my team" the left just doesn't compare with you righties and your mindless regurgitation.

I concede, that's why Clinton lost.
 
ivwshane said:
We know the results, Hillary would have received more votes than Bernie, period. What would have happened had Bernie ran as an independent or Hillary for that matter, is that they both would have lost to trump by an even larger margin and neither would have received more votes than trump like Hillary did. The end result would have been the same.
Click to expand...

Exactly so the DNC let Hilary push them into these contracts, but in reality Hilary needed the DNC as well to attempt to win the election. Thank you for agreeing with my point.
 
JimKiler said:
Exactly so the DNC let Hilary push them into these contracts, but in reality Hilary needed the DNC as well to attempt to win the election. Thank you for agreeing with my point.
Click to expand...
The part that kinda surprises me is the typical Democrat elites that post in this forum seem so proud of the fact that Hillary broke faith with the entire Democratic party and their members in such a slick fashion that it doesn't even come out in the general press until the following year.

From the link that un Amused so kindly posted that proves the falsehood that this was a know fact.
https://www.politico.com/story/2015...ary-clinton-fundraising-agreement-2016-121813

"The document will enable the DNC and the campaign to conduct events and other fundraising activities together that will generate money for both entities. Clinton wouldn’t have access to the money unless and until she’s the nominee........"

"A DNC official said the money would build infrastructure to “to support whoever the eventual Democratic nominee is — as soon as there is a nominee. It will help the party make critical investments in technology, in voter outreach and in helping get out our message leading up to the general election in 2016.”"

OOOPS, i guess the story didn't have the facts that Clinton looted the DNC before she was the nominee.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
The part that kinda surprises me is the typical Democrat elites that post in this forum seem so proud of the fact that Hillary broke faith with the entire Democratic party and their members in such a slick fashion that it doesn't even come out in the general press until the following year.

From the link that un Amused so kindly posted that proves the falsehood that this was a know fact.
https://www.politico.com/story/2015...ary-clinton-fundraising-agreement-2016-121813

"The document will enable the DNC and the campaign to conduct events and other fundraising activities together that will generate money for both entities. Clinton wouldn’t have access to the money unless and until she’s the nominee........"

"A DNC official said the money would build infrastructure to “to support whoever the eventual Democratic nominee is — as soon as there is a nominee. It will help the party make critical investments in technology, in voter outreach and in helping get out our message leading up to the general election in 2016.”"

OOOPS, i guess the story didn't have the facts that Clinton looted the DNC before she was the nominee.
Click to expand...

Your concerned trolling noted.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
What I am suggesting would almost certainly require a Constitutional amendment but I think it would be worth it at least for Presidential elections and Congress if I had my way. All contributions would be doled out from "The Fund", which has independent oversight. PACs want to donate? It goes to the fund, which kills the purpose of having one. All advertising, campaigning, anything and everything must be from this one pot of money. Fraud would be considered a felony of Draconian proportions. Independent auditing of *NCs would be done on a routine basis.
Click to expand...

What you're suggesting is Bigfoot riding a unicorn. It's completely distractional.

Brazile was woefully uninformed when she took the chair of the DNC. Even though it was public information she didn't understand how the Clinton campaign had kept the DNC afloat. When she did figure it out, kinda, she decided that it had somehow been wrong for that to happen the way it did.

The truth is that the Clinton campaign didn't have much choice if they wanted to campaign under the banner of a DNC that had enough money to be effective. DWS obviously wasn't good at money management or fund raising, the latter being something Obama had neglected as well.
 
fskimospy said:
I'm still a bit confused as to what people are actually alleging here. So it's 'rigged', right? What does that actually translate into in terms of actions? I can't think of any outside of debate scheduling, which is pretty minor.

Serious question though, what did they 'rig'?
Click to expand...

You'll get nothing but crickets...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top