Originally posted by: E equals MC2
A good $500 budget will do nicely ($200 on guitar, $200 on amp, $100 on bag, cables, pick, tuner, stand, pedal, etc).
I got a $500 set up for an electric guitar and it's find for my noob talent. I do notice that it's lacking a good sustain notes, pinched harmonics don't sound as nice, there's a buzzing because it doesn't have a humbucker, etc...
But I don't plan on spending anymore on it unless my talent REALLY warrants a better set up. I just play as a hobby here and there - play some green day, lick some solos, etc...
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
A good $500 budget will do nicely ($200 on guitar, $200 on amp, $100 on bag, cables, pick, tuner, stand, pedal, etc).
Originally posted by: CraKaJaX
I guess it's just me, but with something like that no one can pick and choose what I like. It's all about the feel of the guitar when you're playing it. I have to play it before I buy it.
Originally posted by: amjohns5
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
A good $500 budget will do nicely ($200 on guitar, $200 on amp, $100 on bag, cables, pick, tuner, stand, pedal, etc).
I got a $500 set up for an electric guitar and it's find for my noob talent. I do notice that it's lacking a good sustain notes, pinched harmonics don't sound as nice, there's a buzzing because it doesn't have a humbucker, etc...
But I don't plan on spending anymore on it unless my talent REALLY warrants a better set up. I just play as a hobby here and there - play some green day, lick some solos, etc...
If I were you, I would try and find a package deal. If he's just starting, I doubt that he's going to need a 100W amp. You could get the guitar, and a 15W amp for pretty cheap.
Edit: Jumpstart Setup
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
WTF,
Please do NOT listen to this man. Acoustic and Electric are two totally different animals. Of course, a versatile guitarist should be able to play and appreciate both but one starting out in electric guitar should not START with acoustic in hopes of getting better with electric.
Horrible advice. Electric is all about power chords, crunchy palm muting, high-fret solos, pinched harmonics and even vibrato is done differently than in Acoustic.
Acoustic can do none of those. You're in for a REAL dissapointment if you think electric will 'cover up your mistakes' because it's crunchy/messy sounding.
Do not listen to his advice. But then again you're getting a bass anyways, which is neither.
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
WTF,
Please do NOT listen to this man. Acoustic and Electric are two totally different animals. Of course, a versatile guitarist should be able to play and appreciate both but one starting out in electric guitar should not START with acoustic in hopes of getting better with electric.
Horrible advice. Electric is all about power chords, crunchy palm muting, high-fret solos, pinched harmonics and even vibrato is done differently than in Acoustic.
Acoustic can do none of those. You're in for a REAL dissapointment if you think electric will 'cover up your mistakes' because it's crunchy/messy sounding.
Do not listen to his advice. But then again you're getting a bass anyways, which is neither.
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
WTF,
Please do NOT listen to this man. Acoustic and Electric are two totally different animals. Of course, a versatile guitarist should be able to play and appreciate both but one starting out in electric guitar should not START with acoustic in hopes of getting better with electric.
Horrible advice. Electric is all about power chords, crunchy palm muting, high-fret solos, pinched harmonics and even vibrato is done differently than in Acoustic.
Acoustic can do none of those. You're in for a REAL dissapointment if you think electric will 'cover up your mistakes' because it's crunchy/messy sounding.
Do not listen to his advice. But then again you're getting a bass anyways, which is neither.
Actually acoustics are better for strength building in your fingers, but yeah, as far as "covering mistakes with distortion", I'll argue that your mistake is actually going to be amplified instead of covered up.
Things like vibrato, muting, and harmonics are all used in acoustic playing. Hell, you can't do a decent blues progression without palm muting![]()
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
I still take issue with the notion that "electric is all about power chords and high-note solos"
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
WTF,
Please do NOT listen to this man. Acoustic and Electric are two totally different animals. Of course, a versatile guitarist should be able to play and appreciate both but one starting out in electric guitar should not START with acoustic in hopes of getting better with electric.
Horrible advice. Electric is all about power chords, crunchy palm muting, high-fret solos, pinched harmonics and even vibrato is done differently than in Acoustic.
Acoustic can do none of those. You're in for a REAL dissapointment if you think electric will 'cover up your mistakes' because it's crunchy/messy sounding.
Do not listen to his advice. But then again you're getting a bass anyways, which is neither.
Actually acoustics are better for strength building in your fingers, but yeah, as far as "covering mistakes with distortion", I'll argue that your mistake is actually going to be amplified instead of covered up.
Things like vibrato, muting, and harmonics are all used in acoustic playing. Hell, you can't do a decent blues progression without palm muting![]()
I didn't say they're not used. They're done differently. Vibrato in acoustics is done by 'finger-crying'. In electric, you perform vibrato by twisting your wrist. I was that victim of 'picking up the acoustic first before electric' noob mindset by my mom who knows nothing about music.
After years of playing electric, I wondered why the range of my vibrato was so narrow and not as cool sounding as heard in rock. Turns out, I have to RE-LEARN vibrato with the electric guitar method and it was a freaking hard ass habit to get rid of from acoustics.
Palm muting is the same way. If you think you're good at palm muting in acoustics and expect the same in electric, good luck to you. You have to learn to re-adjust.
And it's not even about techniques. The paths of acoustic and electric is just going in separate ways. Good luck throwing away all your base chords you learned in acoustics, only to find out electric is all about powerchords and high-note solos which acoustics never got you accustomed to.
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Looks like a good one for an electric.
The OP seems to have his mind made up, but for anyone else reading this thread, if you're looking to start playing a guitar, seriously consider going acoustic first. If you want to learn to play, an acoustic won't cover up your mistakes the way the distortion on an electric will, forcing you to be a better player.
WTF,
Please do NOT listen to this man. Acoustic and Electric are two totally different animals. Of course, a versatile guitarist should be able to play and appreciate both but one starting out in electric guitar should not START with acoustic in hopes of getting better with electric.
Horrible advice. Electric is all about power chords, crunchy palm muting, high-fret solos, pinched harmonics and even vibrato is done differently than in Acoustic.
Acoustic can do none of those. You're in for a REAL dissapointment if you think electric will 'cover up your mistakes' because it's crunchy/messy sounding.
Do not listen to his advice. But then again you're getting a bass anyways, which is neither.
Actually acoustics are better for strength building in your fingers, but yeah, as far as "covering mistakes with distortion", I'll argue that your mistake is actually going to be amplified instead of covered up.
Things like vibrato, muting, and harmonics are all used in acoustic playing. Hell, you can't do a decent blues progression without palm muting![]()
I didn't say they're not used. They're done differently. Vibrato in acoustics is done by 'finger-crying'. In electric, you perform vibrato by twisting your wrist. I was that victim of 'picking up the acoustic first before electric' noob mindset by my mom who knows nothing about music.
After years of playing electric, I wondered why the range of my vibrato was so narrow and not as cool sounding as heard in rock. Turns out, I have to RE-LEARN vibrato with the electric guitar method and it was a freaking hard ass habit to get rid of from acoustics.
Palm muting is the same way. If you think you're good at palm muting in acoustics and expect the same in electric, good luck to you. You have to learn to re-adjust.
And it's not even about techniques. The paths of acoustic and electric is just going in separate ways. Good luck throwing away all your base chords you learned in acoustics, only to find out electric is all about powerchords and high-note solos which acoustics never got you accustomed to.
I use the same vibrato on both acoustic and electric. On acoustic I just have to do it harderPalm muting works the same way too...not sure what you can do different there.
Also, chords are chords on any guitar.
Exactly. You learn different songs depending on what instrument you choose, but either way you're learning chords, finger placement, and hand movement. Also, I don't get where you're getting the insane ideas mistakes are MORE noticeable with an electric. Distortion effects MASK mistakes.
To learn the basics of playing a guitar, then you start on an ACCOUSTIC. If you want to learn how to play Panama or Smoke on the Water or other specific rock songs, then by all means, go for an Electric. Learning on an acoustic requires more finger strength, and more precise chord placement and movement. It'll teach you better.
