Originally posted by: Josh
I have a short attention span, will it keep me entertained for ALL 3 hours?
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
I like it better than No Country but I didn't think either was really that good. I think I kept looking for a point or a message or something like that in There Will Be Blood. After the movie was over I realized it was just about the dude being a fucking asshole which is pretty cool, I was just expecting there to be some big lesson or point at the end because it was Oscar nominated.
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
I somewhat agree. Its been on TV a few times recently, and while I can watch it, it doesn't really draw me in or anything. There's something about it that bothers me, almost like it presents itself as authentic of the time, but there's a feeling of fakeness to it. Hard to explain, but there's just something about it. Yes, I know the TV version sucks, but I'm fairly certain the things I have issue with won't go away with the DVD/theatrical release. And I think DDL might end up being another one of those cult-following actors that I think both doesn't get enough appreciation by the mainstream but too much appreciation by others.
Originally posted by: Josh
I have a short attention span, will it keep me entertained for ALL 3 hours?
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
I like it better than No Country but I didn't think either was really that good. I think I kept looking for a point or a message or something like that in There Will Be Blood. After the movie was over I realized it was just about the dude being a fucking asshole which is pretty cool, I was just expecting there to be some big lesson or point at the end because it was Oscar nominated.
It was stupid, over-the-top nonsense.Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
I somewhat agree. Its been on TV a few times recently, and while I can watch it, it doesn't really draw me in or anything. There's something about it that bothers me, almost like it presents itself as authentic of the time, but there's a feeling of fakeness to it. Hard to explain, but there's just something about it. Yes, I know the TV version sucks, but I'm fairly certain the things I have issue with won't go away with the DVD/theatrical release. And I think DDL might end up being another one of those cult-following actors that I think both doesn't get enough appreciation by the mainstream but too much appreciation by others.
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
I somewhat agree. Its been on TV a few times recently, and while I can watch it, it doesn't really draw me in or anything. There's something about it that bothers me, almost like it presents itself as authentic of the time, but there's a feeling of fakeness to it. Hard to explain, but there's just something about it. Yes, I know the TV version sucks, but I'm fairly certain the things I have issue with won't go away with the DVD/theatrical release. And I think DDL might end up being another one of those cult-following actors that I think both doesn't get enough appreciation by the mainstream but too much appreciation by others.
Originally posted by: Bootprint
I found it pretty good until the last 45 minutes or so.
Maybe a DVD director's cut would help pace out that last little bit the of movie, even though it would be longer.
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
I like it better than No Country but I didn't think either was really that good. I think I kept looking for a point or a message or something like that in There Will Be Blood. After the movie was over I realized it was just about the dude being a fucking asshole which is pretty cool, I was just expecting there to be some big lesson or point at the end because it was Oscar nominated.
Originally posted by: IamBusby
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
I somewhat agree. Its been on TV a few times recently, and while I can watch it, it doesn't really draw me in or anything. There's something about it that bothers me, almost like it presents itself as authentic of the time, but there's a feeling of fakeness to it. Hard to explain, but there's just something about it. Yes, I know the TV version sucks, but I'm fairly certain the things I have issue with won't go away with the DVD/theatrical release. And I think DDL might end up being another one of those cult-following actors that I think both doesn't get enough appreciation by the mainstream but too much appreciation by others.
I agree. watching Gangs of New york almost feels like watching a musical based on the same period. It just doesn't feel authentic at all. Daniel Day lewis is amazing in the film but even his performance seems somewhat fake and over dramatic.
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Originally posted by: LS21
think Gangs of New York set in 20th century. DDL always plays a badass
Gangs of New York was awful...
I somewhat agree. Its been on TV a few times recently, and while I can watch it, it doesn't really draw me in or anything. There's something about it that bothers me, almost like it presents itself as authentic of the time, but there's a feeling of fakeness to it. Hard to explain, but there's just something about it. Yes, I know the TV version sucks, but I'm fairly certain the things I have issue with won't go away with the DVD/theatrical release. And I think DDL might end up being another one of those cult-following actors that I think both doesn't get enough appreciation by the mainstream but too much appreciation by others.
Hard to explain? Gangs of New York wasn't authentic at all. Does anyone seriously think New York was anything like that in any time period whatsoever? Have we really degenerated to the point where we could think that there might be even a single grain of truth in that entire movie? Real life isn't a video game, it isn't now and it wasn't back then, god damn.
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: SoulAssassin
I like it better than No Country but I didn't think either was really that good. I think I kept looking for a point or a message or something like that in There Will Be Blood. After the movie was over I realized it was just about the dude being a fucking asshole which is pretty cool, I was just expecting there to be some big lesson or point at the end because it was Oscar nominated.
There was a message. Greed and the lust for power/wealth destroys all. A fairly straightforward message actually.
