archcommus
Diamond Member
I'm currently running the first system I've ever overclocked, and while it's nice to get an extra 400 and some MHz for free, I don't think I'll be OCing anymore after my next upgrade. Reasons:
1) I like my warranties.
2) I hate going to great lengths to test for stability with Prime and Memtest when regular everyday stability might be just fine.
3) I hate having to look at your overclock FIRST anytime there is any problem at all, i.e., anytime something goes wrong, you probably blame the OC before anything else.
4) OCing in a way requires MORE money because you have to make sure you buy the perfect parts. You don't have to buy QUITE as good of memory if you don't intend to OC, for example.
5) Easier to cool without OCing.
I know that a lot of you are much more "hardcore" than I am in terms of the speed of your computer (often even if it won't help in everyday stuff, just for the pure reason of getting it faster), so please don't tell me OCing is awesome and good - I realize a lot of you love it, to each his own. Just interested to see if there are others who DON'T prefer it like me.
1) I like my warranties.
2) I hate going to great lengths to test for stability with Prime and Memtest when regular everyday stability might be just fine.
3) I hate having to look at your overclock FIRST anytime there is any problem at all, i.e., anytime something goes wrong, you probably blame the OC before anything else.
4) OCing in a way requires MORE money because you have to make sure you buy the perfect parts. You don't have to buy QUITE as good of memory if you don't intend to OC, for example.
5) Easier to cool without OCing.
I know that a lot of you are much more "hardcore" than I am in terms of the speed of your computer (often even if it won't help in everyday stuff, just for the pure reason of getting it faster), so please don't tell me OCing is awesome and good - I realize a lot of you love it, to each his own. Just interested to see if there are others who DON'T prefer it like me.