• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is there any such thing as a religious hot deal?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Jzero
Originally posted by: QTArrhythmic
Wow. I would have to say that Valsalva has made some pretty strong arguments for his case.

Jzero, all you did was speak in unfalsifiable claims and post-ad hok fallacies. And most of the time, you didn't even address Valsalva's points.

As an outside, totality unbiased, observer you have failed to convince me that Jesus and the other 2/3 should be immune on the HD forum.

Had you been paying attention, you would have realized that I'm not trying to convince anyone about Jesus. Valsalva has ignored as many of my points as I have his. As for your "unfalsifiable claims" and "ad hok fallacies" kindly quote them so I can see where I made some kind of mistake. I don't recall ever trying to pass my opinion off as fact.

I have ignored many of Valsalva's points because I decline to be dragged into a religious mudslinging match. The thread title is
is there any such thing as a religious hot deal?
for the purposes of evaluating whether or not they belong in the HD forum. Nothing more.

Well, let's tally them up, shall we?

1) JZero demands that people be more courteous and respectful on AT. Then he tells a forum member to "STFU" several times. When accused of being a hypocrite, he fails to acknowledge the obvious.
2) JZero has demonstrated himself to be rude and obnovious to other forum members, yet he demands that certain individuals be banned because they are disrespectful.
3) JZero whines that there has been an intellectual decline on AT since 1998. (Based on his syntax and the weakness of his arguments, I might say that he has been a contributor....) Then he proclaims that ValsalvaYourHeartOut "REPRESENTS" this intellectual decline. Talk about unsubstantiated claim.
4) JZero feels compelled to play WannaBeMod by telling people they cannot post in certain threads because he says so. He tries to reference certain lines in the forum rules, but conveniently ignores other lines -- when confronted with other segments of the forum rules, he shuts up real fast.
5) CrobUSA opens up a thread in religious hot deals, and JZero, unprovoked and out of the blue, starts berating ValsalvaYourHeartOut...then he goes on to say that "he doesn't want to be dragged into a religious mudslinging match." JZero is obviously kidding himself.
5) JZero has demonstrated a high degree of impartiality himself, yet he accuses QT of being unobjective.

The list goes on and on....

Valsalva
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
Had you been paying attention, you would have realized that I'm not trying to convince anyone about Jesus. Valsalva has ignored as many of my points as I have his. As for your "unfalsifiable claims" and "ad hok fallacies" kindly quote them so I can see where I made some kind of mistake. I don't recall ever trying to pass my opinion off as fact.

Yeah I have been paying attention and I didn't say you were trying to convince anyone of Jesus, you were trying talk about Jesus in the context of religious deals. "Unfalsifiable claims" and "ad hok fallacies" are both pitfalls of an argument even if its your opinion. All I have seen is Valsalva wipe the floor with your @ss; you are in the need of some divine intervention.
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
I like how when people don't understand something, they automatically draw a random conclusion that sorta makes sense (until you actually think about it). That's you. Yeah, I'm scared...scared of something, but definitely scared. Why? because I respond to the "usual gang of hateful Christians on AT."
If you didn't care, you'd keep your trap shut, just like so many of the others who don't feel the need to contribute to flame wars in HD. You care enough to engage in and perpetuate the discussions. Why? You are as bad as the people who are trying to save you - are you trying to save them from themselves or what?

You still have yet to substantiate your claim that I'm scared of something. Otherwise, you're just talking out of your a$$. ...you'd might as well stipulate that now because I don't expect you to come up with anything good.

2) True, however I contest the point that it would improve the intelligence level. If the community here had some intelligence, we wouldn't be having this discussion - the event would have never occurred either because the poster would have thought better, or the respondents would have.

If you're not happy with the intelligence level on, you're free to leave. Don't let me stop you. But to address the issue, you compare two scenarios: 1) ATHD + religious threads and 2) ATHD without religious threads. You have already mentioned that the content of religious threads decreases the intellectual level of HD...therefore, by removing them, the overall intelligence of ATHD should be higher. qed.

But either way, your point is irrelevant. This is AnandTech, not IntelliTech. The HD forum is about hot deals, not intelligence, and you have no right to demand that we do things to improve the intellectual level of the forum to your liking.

Valsalva
Naturally, if we're going to ban religious deals, there should be consequences for knowingly breaking the rules, as with any other rules. I disagree with your reasoning:
A) as has been said, all freebies are just trying to "spread the word." Whether it's a church or a company makes no difference.

That is incorrect. When people post a genuine HD, it's to "spread the deal" -- that is, to let other people know there's a hot deal so other people can get in on it too. It's a good-natured gesture that people have to help others out and it's a matter of reciprocity, since we get hot deals from other people too. In sharp contrast, in the so-called religious HD, the poster is just trying to spread the word about God 'N Friends. He does it because he thinks it'll earn him brownie points with Jesus and because he has been instructed to help plant the seed. This should NOT be permissible based on 3 premises that have already been set by precedence:
a) Deals for personal gain are NOT permitted. (i.e. someone posts a deal, but with a referral link so the poster gets benefits from other people's purchases). Similarly, when people capitalize on a religious poster's hot deal, the poster gets glorified with Jesus 'N Friends, etc.
b) Deals from a company promoting its own deal is not permitted because it is biased, self-serving, and constitutes free advertisement. (i.e. the owner of Bob's Discount Monitors cannot post a so-called "deal to his own website). Similarly, the Christians should not be posting "deals" that constitute recruitment efforts for their own religion.
c) This is a private forum. The mods have the right to allow and disallow certain items/deals based on community standards and their own discretion. They have already banned religious deals ONCE, but lifted the ban later. Thus, a "church" deal is not just like a hot deal from an ordinary person for a consumer product.

Valsalva


B) never hot to you, doesn't mean never hot to everyone.
C) I agree with that.
D) This is also not CondomTech. Shall we ban all non-technical deals? That's been discussed before when some ladies from mycoupons started flooding the forum with deals on diapers and pantiliners.

No, it should just be to silence the flamers.[/quote]

 
1) JZero demands that people be more courteous and respectful on AT. Then he tells a forum member to "STFU" several times. When accused of being a hypocrite, he fails to acknowledge the obvious.
Nor did I deny it. I AM a hypocrite, and so are you. Who cares? Sometimes you have to deal with a belligerent child like a belligerent child. I respond as I see fit.
2) JZero has demonstrated himself to be rude and obnovious to other forum members, yet he demands that certain individuals be banned because they are disrespectful.
I am rude and obnoxious to YOU because you are a pain in the ass, and because I know you'll respond every single time - it's rather amusing. As for them being banned, they should be banned because they are BREAKING THE RULES. I do consider it a matter of respect, but at the end of the day, if the rule didn't exist, I'd not say a word.
3) JZero whines that there has been an intellectual decline on AT since 1998. (Based on his syntax and the weakness of his arguments, I might say that he has been a contributor....) Then he proclaims that ValsalvaYourHeartOut "REPRESENTS" this intellectual decline. Talk about unsubstantiated claim.
It's ok. I forgive your lack of comprehension.
rolleye.gif

4) JZero feels compelled to play WannaBeMod by telling people they cannot post in certain threads because he says so. He tries to reference certain lines in the forum rules, but conveniently ignores other lines -- when confronted with other segments of the forum rules, he shuts up real fast.
I responded to your claim. You ignored it. Nothing new from you. You are not doing a service to the community by warning of a scam when you have no evidence that a scam exists, hence, you are thread crapping.
5) CrobUSA opens up a thread in religious hot deals, and JZero, unprovoked and out of the blue, starts berating ValsalvaYourHeartOut...then he goes on to say that "he doesn't want to be dragged into a religious mudslinging match." JZero is obviously kidding himself.
The thread referenced in the first post has YOU, VALSALVAYOURHEARTOUT being censured for your inability to keep silent. How is that out of the blue? Further, I substantiated my point with FOUR links in which you attempted to derail the thread out of your own bizarre malice. And that is only using ONE search - I could easily find more.
5) JZero has demonstrated a high degree of impartiality himself, yet he accuses QT of being unobjective.
Never ONCE did I claim impartiality, TYVM.

In fact, I have spent this entire thread attempting to keep it on topic. I'm glad the mods are reading it since they apparently requested Crobusa to start it.
rolleye.gif

We have obviously arrived at the consensus (at least the two of us) that we should jsut get rid of them - regardless of the rationale.

That said, I've had enough of going in circles. I'll let you have the last word, since I know we'll go in circles forever if I don't, anyway.
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
I AM a hypocrite.

I'm glad you finally acknowledge that fact. Therefore you have NO right to demand that people be courteous. End of discussion.

5) JZero has demonstrated a high degree of impartiality himself, yet he accuses QT of being unobjective.
Never ONCE did I claim impartiality, TYVM. [/quote]

Which makes you a hypocrite.

That said, I've had enough of going in circles. I'll let you have the last word, since I know we'll go in circles forever if I don't, anyway.

Well it's nice to see that somebody who is so demanding and so hypocritical is really also is a very sore loser....but I predicted that you wouldn't have any more nonsense to contribute. QT was very accurate in describing you.

Valsalva
 
Which makes you a hypocrite.
Let me get this straight...I never claim to be unbiased or impartial.
QT claims to be impartial, when he is clearly not.
I call him on it.
That is hypocrisy? Do you know the meaning of the word???

Ahh forget it. I said you could have the last word, so I'm done. CYA in HD.
 
ValsalvaYourHeartOut,

You do a tremendous job of taking texts out of context, putting wording into other people's mouths and avoiding real issues.

And no, I'm not Freud. Why don't you just tell us why you have so much anger? People post a "Hot Deal" and you are so infuriated that you feel you MUST destroy the thread... why? What's going on inside you that makes you so vehemently angry at all things religious? Everything else that's being discussed is flak and only takes the spotlight off the real issue, your anger.

So why don't you stop all the ranting and raving and twisting of people's words and instead share why you're so worked up?

BTW... before you accuse me of "demanding" that you tell us why you are so anti-religion, please note that the last sentence was an interrogative, not an imperative.

Joe
 
ValsalvaYourHeartOut - Do you really believe that if I post a hot deal on a Bible that I think I am winning brownie points with Jesus? If that is what you think, you are sadly mistaken. Or that I am trying to recruit you to become a Christian? If so, don't flatter yourself.

My real question is why do you hate Christianity so much? And how often are you recruited? Why do this even bother you? If I see a HD on a book by the Dali Lama, I just move along. you wanna post a free book on wiccan sacrifices, be my guest, won't see me in that thread. But you........

"Me thinks you doth protest too much..."
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
Which makes you a hypocrite.
Let me get this straight...I never claim to be unbiased or impartial.
QT claims to be impartial, when he is clearly not.
I call him on it.
That is hypocrisy? Do you know the meaning of the word???

Ahh forget it. I said you could have the last word, so I'm done. CYA in HD.

Yeah, let's get this straight. For I-dunno-how-many posts you've climbed up on your soapbox preaching about how people on AT are disrepectful and demanded that people show more courtesy. Then you turn around telling people to STFU, STFU, STFU. When confronted about this, you finally admit it: "Nor did I deny it. I AM a hypocrite." I'm not sure what else you want me to say...maybe ask YOURSELF if you "know the meaning of the word."

Valsalva

 
Originally posted by: Netopia
ValsalvaYourHeartOut, You do a tremendous job of taking texts out of context, putting wording into other people's mouths and avoiding real issues.

Thank you for the sweeping generalizations. I fail to see how you could accuse me of such things given that it is my practice to always respond by QUOTING the previous poster -- that way there is no confusion about what I'm referring to...which is something YOU failed to do which puts absolutely no weight on your statement. A lot of times people write things and don't realize what they say -- I just call them on it, whereas the original poster things "I'm putting words in his mouth." For instance, you produced this great psychoanalysis of me:

"What you care about is that you've got an issue with God and you want to vent it onto everyone else. You have deep seated resentments and you feel the need to act out. Somewhere you've got some major pain in you that you think is eased by attacking people of faith and the faith they believe in."

Unforunately, your conclusions are clearly NOT based on anything I've written or even implied, and are probably sentiments of your own frustration to understand me. (A person who doesn't like religious hot deals MUST have an issue with god and feels the need to vent....) Making up a story that sorta fits the available evidence is a common practice in Sunday School, but absurd everywhere else. This is why I called you "Freud" sarcastically.

Why don't you just tell us why you have so much anger? People post a "Hot Deal" and you are so infuriated that you feel you MUST destroy the thread... why? What's going on inside you that makes you so vehemently angry at all things religious? Everything else that's being discussed is flak and only takes the spotlight off the real issue, your anger.

See, this is what I'm talking about. I think the only person angry here is YOU. In fact, you sound like you wanna STRIKE ME DOWN WITH GREAT VENGEANCE AND FUUUUUUUUUURIOUS ANGER!!!!!!! Talk about projecting one's anger onto someone else. Textbook. But wait...anyone who points out why certain religious hot deals are NOT HOT must be VERY ANGRY!!....and anyone who responds to the hatred from the Christians of AT must also be SERIOUSLY ANGRY...because there's no other explanation...........well, at least that *you* can come up with.

BTW... before you accuse me of "demanding" that you tell us why you are so anti-religion, please note that the last sentence was an interrogative, not an imperative.

Woh, I don't remember accusing you of demanding such a thing, but I don't know for sure because someone here needs to learn how to quote. But since you bring it up, I think you're pretty demanding in general. Here's some actual QUOTES from your previous posts:
"So why don't you stop all the ranting and raving and twisting of people's words "
"[If you don't like this particular Religious Hot Deal], come up with something better and back it up yourself"
"you need to ask yourself why you feel the need to rant and rave and carry on"
"ask yourself why and then try to deal with your internal issues"

Since you strike me as a grammatician yourself, perhaps you can tell me what mood these sentences are in? What's that???? IMPERATIVE??? WOW!!!!! You're SMART! If you examine the overall tone, you will find that it is pushy and extremely condescending. You are so full of yourself that you are no longer capable of seeing that you are full of yourself.

Valsalva

 
Originally posted by: przero
ValsalvaYourHeartOut - Do you really believe that if I post a hot deal on a Bible that I think I am winning brownie points with Jesus?

You in particular?? Probably not. Subconsciously???? YES. (you wouldn't know it.) But for other people, I have no doubt that many would do it for subconscious brownie points...especially the ones with lots of guilt or previous transgressions.

Or that I am trying to recruit you to become a Christian? If so, don't flatter yourself.

Recruit ME? HA! Don't flatter YOURSELF.

My real question is why do you hate Christianity so much?

I don't hate Christianity. I dislike certain aspects of it, just as Christians dislike aspects of atheism, for example. On the other hand, there are certain people, esp on AT, who also happen to be Christian, whom I have an aversion for. There's a difference. People who automatically assume that I am anti-Christian are either a) very dense or b) believe what they want to believe irrespective of actual evidence or c) read at the 3rd grade level. Pick one.

Valsalva
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
Which makes you a hypocrite.
Let me get this straight...I never claim to be unbiased or impartial.
QT claims to be impartial, when he is clearly not.
I call him on it.
That is hypocrisy? Do you know the meaning of the word???

Ahh forget it. I said you could have the last word, so I'm done. CYA in HD.

Sore loser, eh?

 
So why did you say this "Can my authorized witness be a Catholic priest accused of child molestation?"? Sure seems like some hatred there?? Especially on an HD thread. And many of your post follow the same train of thought. Why not just pass up the religious threads? By the way, I agree about the use of STFU, especially by those defending Christianity.
 
Originally posted by: przero
So why did you say this "Can my authorized witness be a Catholic priest accused of child molestation?"? Sure seems like some hatred there??

As usual, you are guilty of horrendous overinterpretation. I bet you might also interpret a sentence such as "Bob ran." as a poor little school boy fleeing from a 100-ft serpent who wants to eat him for lunch. Unfortunately, the only meaning that can be derived from that short sentence is that Bob ran. That's it. In my case, my statement was clearly an ironic remark meant to satirize the recent priest molestation in the Catholic Church -- an undertone of hatred is NOT present and cannot be derived from that sentence, just as you cannot extract a theory about the 100-ft serpent out of the sentence "Bob ran."

By the way, I agree about the use of STFU, especially by those defending Christianity.

It's amazing how many things you can justify in the name of Christianity....now we've justified the usage of profanity in a public forum. Amazing.

Valsalva

 
Back
Top