BoomerD
No Lifer
- Feb 26, 2006
- 65,944
- 14,338
- 146
You must have low standards for fiction.
Here's an interesting video on the subject, if you're so inclined.
What? It’s got it all…sex, incest, murder…
You must have low standards for fiction.
Here's an interesting video on the subject, if you're so inclined.
All that stuff's super interesting, but I'm too dumb to really understand it. It would be cool to become omnipotent, and/or have perfect understanding of how things work, and be able to see it in person.You must have low standards for fiction.
Here's an interesting video on the subject, if you're so inclined.
I guess that confirms your low standards, you just want lurid content, not good writingWhat? It’s got it all…sex, incest, murder…
I think plenty of people including modern physicists speculate about those ideas. The problem is we’ll never be able to prove it one way or the other because our observations are limited to what we can observe in our local universe. For all we know we could live inside an enormous black hole in a wider infinite expanse, or in any number of different types of multiverse. Nothing in modern physics can say anything definitive about it though. Check out the book The Mathematical Universe by Max Tegmark.Our understanding of space, time and the universe is centered on the Big Bang being the beginning of everything. Why? Why do we limit ourselves in that way?
How many Supernovas have we logged? Why do we insist there could have been only one Big Bang? Why couldn't our Big Bang have been just one of many, each one spawning a new 'universe' of galaxies?
They say time is timeless. Why do we limit time to have begun with what we call the Big Bang? Perhaps the billions of years we know of are just a fraction of a second in a bigger period of time.
Perhaps what we know of as humans came from one of those other big bang eras.
I have that book and it's fantastic.I think plenty of people including modern physicists speculate about those ideas. The problem is we’ll never be able to prove it one way or the other because our observations are limited to what we can observe in our local universe. For all we know we could live inside an enormous black hole in a wider infinite expanse, or in any number of different types of multiverse. Nothing in modern physics can say anything definitive about it though. Check out the book The Mathematical Universe by Max Tegmark.
I guess that it doesn't matter if there are many universes as they wouldn't be able to interact if they were separate universes!I don't see why there can't be many universes. Almost everything we see is a superset of something smaller. It's likely this "universe" is just a distinct clump of stuff floating in some cosmic goo, and there's uncountable other universes expanding, and tearing apart all around it.
I don't know that I'd conclude that. In my model, think of a universe as a galaxy. It's a self contained unit, with self contained mechanics. It stands as a functioning system even if nothing else exists aside from that galaxy. However, galaxies do collide, and the systems mix.I guess that it doesn't matter if there are many universes as they wouldn't be able to interact if they were separate universes!
Prometheus is basically HP Lovecraft's Cthulhu mythos novel "At The Mountains Of Madness" bolted onto a (very) badly written Alien prequel script.The movie Prometheus has as a concept that humans were seeded onto Earth by a different alien species.