• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is there a performance difference between fat32 and ntfs?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: squidman
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Leave FAT32 behind. It's old. NTFS is new and better.
Click to expand...

Actually, NTFS is older than FAT32... it's just better.
Click to expand...

Would the two Jeffs stop arguing with one another? 😛

You're both correct.

NTFS 1.0 < FAT32 < NTFS 2.0 < WFS (Longhorn's SQL-style FS)

- M4H
Click to expand...

There were different versions of ntfs? I thought once the file format was introduced, only its security features were altered. WFS?! When is that coming out?
Click to expand...

?? NTFS 2.0 came out with win2k and NTFS 2.1 came out with WinXP (believe so anyways.)
NTFS 1.0 was back in the win NT4 days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top