- Mar 2, 2006
- 5,214
- 1
- 81
I'm sorry if this question has been answered already but I'm just wondering why people would buy the higher stock frequency instead of overclocking the lower one (I know some people can't overclock but still, some people that do know how to overclock seem to buy the processor with higher stock frequencies).
Is the 3500+ "safer" or "better" than the 3000+/3200+? I know that because they have the same core, they *should* overclock the same.
Once again, if this question has been answered, I'm sorry. If you could, please link me to the answer!
Thank you!
Is the 3500+ "safer" or "better" than the 3000+/3200+? I know that because they have the same core, they *should* overclock the same.
Once again, if this question has been answered, I'm sorry. If you could, please link me to the answer!
Thank you!