Originally posted by: dullard
What is it that bothers you about having a 5:4 resolution on a 5:4 monitor? I'm just curious since I love 5:4 - those few extra lines allow you to do things much more efficiently. Examples:
1) a full page of text in Word or Acrobat Reader fits nicely at 100% zoom with all the toolbars showing on 1600x1280 but not at 1600x1200 (in fact two full pages fit side by side at that resolution).
2) you get a few more lines of code on the screen or a few more lines of a spreadsheet making you that much more efficient with less scrolling.
Yes we know you don't like 5:4. My question is why don't you like it? I'm just curious. I gave you reasons why I like 5:4 what are your reasons for liking 4:3?Originally posted by: Jumpem4:3 is what I consider a proper aspect ratio... I don't really like 5:4.
Originally posted by: dullard
Yes we know you don't like 5:4. My question is why don't you like it? I'm just curious. I gave you reasons why I like 5:4 what are your reasons for liking 4:3?Originally posted by: Jumpem4:3 is what I consider a proper aspect ratio... I don't really like 5:4.
A 5:4 resolution on a 4:3 monitor would of course be stretched, but on a 5:4 monitor it won't be stretched.Originally posted by: JumpemFor desktop apps and such I don't mind it. But it seems that in games the screen is stretched so to speak. Maybe it's just me.
Originally posted by: dullard
A 5:4 resolution on a 4:3 monitor would of course be stretched, but on a 5:4 monitor it won't be stretched.Originally posted by: JumpemFor desktop apps and such I don't mind it. But it seems that in games the screen is stretched so to speak. Maybe it's just me.