• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is the Xeon processor a server chip?

Monkey_Business

Monkey_Business

Guest
Is the Intel Xeon processor a server chip? Can you play games on it? I know that Playstation 3's 9-core "cell" processor is a server chip, which is why it is actually a bit slower at running games than XBOX 360's Tri-core CPU.
 
Yes it's a server chip, but that's more marketing that anything else. The architecture is no different.
 
Server or workstation chip. Mine runs faster & cooler than my i7-920 did...

Do you really think that the speed of the playstation and xbox has anything to do with the classification of their processors?
 
The only difference between Xeons and Core i7's is that Xeons are binned higher and have support for ECC RAM. They are aimed at Servers and workstations, but besides those two differences are no different than an i7.
 
Spartacus288 said:
The only difference between Xeons and Core i7's is that Xeons are binned higher and have support for ECC RAM. They are aimed at Servers and workstations, but besides those two differences are no different than an i7.
Click to expand...

Most of the higher ones also have the option to be installed in dual socket or quad socket boards. Sometimes other small difference from the desktop brothers but nothing you would notice.
 
jtisgeek said:
Most of the higher ones also have the option to be installed in dual socket or quad socket boards. Sometimes other small difference from the desktop brothers but nothing you would notice.
Click to expand...

Any of the current dual socket boards have overclocking options??
 
Spartacus288 said:
The only difference between Xeons and Core i7's is that Xeons are binned higher and have support for ECC RAM. They are aimed at Servers and workstations, but besides those two differences are no different than an i7.
Click to expand...

They are not binned higher.

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=37153&processor=i7-975&spec-codes=SLBEQ
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=39723

i7 975 vs. W3580

Primary differences are:
975:
VID Voltage Range 0.800V-1.375V
Memory Types DDR3-800/1066
Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported No

W3580:
VID Voltage Range 0.800V-1.225V
Memory Types DDR3-800/1066/1333
Max Memory Bandwidth 32 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported Yes
 
Monkey_Business said:
Can you play Crysis on a Xeon?
Click to expand...

What part of there the same chips did you miss? Only adds sever like features to the chips everything else is the same just no need for home user to pay more money for stuff they don't use or need.

Also someone asked about overclocking depends on the boards most sever board don't have much in terms of overclocking but you can get boards that allow it yes.
 
jtisgeek said:
What part of there the same chips did you miss? Only adds sever like features to the chips everything else is the same just no need for home user to pay more money for stuff they don't use or need.

Also someone asked about overclocking depends on the boards most sever board don't have much in terms of overclocking but you can get boards that allow it yes.
Click to expand...

I thought server chips were not very good at all, at playing video games.

So what you're saying is that the Xeon is basically a Core i7 with added, server-like features.
 
Monkey_Business said:
I thought server chips were not very good at all, at playing video games.

So what you're saying is that the Xeon is basically a Core i7 with added, server-like features.
Click to expand...

Yes Exactly.

I think the 5600 series xeons are i7 based anything below that is core 2 like quads.
 
There is nothing about server chips that make them inherently worse to game with than their desktop counterparts (aside from typically having lower clock speeds, and often using different ram)



The xbox is better at playing games than PS3 because the PS3 has no games
 
yh125d said:
There is nothing about server chips that make them inherently worse to game with than their desktop counterparts (aside from typically having lower clock speeds, and often using different ram)



The xbox is better at playing games than PS3 because the PS3 has no games
Click to expand...

And the PS3 has no games because it picked a CPU architecture that should have never been used for games. A crappy SDK, a vastly different architecture, and you have something that is hell to develop for.
 
yh125d said:
There is nothing about server chips that make them inherently worse to game with than their desktop counterparts (aside from typically having lower clock speeds, and often using different ram)



The xbox is better at playing games than PS3 because the PS3 has no games
Click to expand...

😀
 
Gillbot said:
They are not binned higher.
Click to expand...

They are in the sense that they are rated for continuous operation at high utilisation which not all consumer labelled chips will be able to achieve. Same with 1P Opteron v. Phenom II.

And from the lower max voltage I'd expect the average Xeon to use less power than the average desktop chip of the same specs.
 
Checking the spec sheets of xeon's vs their standard counterpart shows the xeons to have higher thermal tolerances than desktop cpu's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top