The nation is of the people and hence, the population decides what the country is. Considering that the majority of the country is "Christian", I would definitely say it is a "Christian country". However, that definition would change as soon as any other religion or lack thereof gains popularity. However, that is not to say that because the majority is Christian, the rights of minority religions to have equal opportunities is to be cast asside. One of the main founding principles and the basis for the Bill of Rights.
As for the principles for the foundation of the country. It was more based on certain "inalienable rights" which were "self evident". "God" was used simply as a reason because the majority back then (and even nowadays but more so back then) was Christian. The focus on the "God" part is incorrect. If the majority had been Muslim, it would have been "Allah" and the same "inalienable rights" would still exist (try as I might I cannot find anything in the Bible about inalienable rights).
That is not to say that some principles were not Christian-base. Indeed some may have, some good, some bad. The whole witch thing for one and later, persecution of members of other religions, etc. As for whether it should be entirely based on Christianity, if 100% of the country were Christian and not a single member of other religions existed, then absolutely. However, as I stated above, the country is of the people and for the people and if a certain percentage of the people are not Christian, then making policy based on Christian principles and applying it to them would be....what's the word......oppression.
As for the principles for the foundation of the country. It was more based on certain "inalienable rights" which were "self evident". "God" was used simply as a reason because the majority back then (and even nowadays but more so back then) was Christian. The focus on the "God" part is incorrect. If the majority had been Muslim, it would have been "Allah" and the same "inalienable rights" would still exist (try as I might I cannot find anything in the Bible about inalienable rights).
That is not to say that some principles were not Christian-base. Indeed some may have, some good, some bad. The whole witch thing for one and later, persecution of members of other religions, etc. As for whether it should be entirely based on Christianity, if 100% of the country were Christian and not a single member of other religions existed, then absolutely. However, as I stated above, the country is of the people and for the people and if a certain percentage of the people are not Christian, then making policy based on Christian principles and applying it to them would be....what's the word......oppression.