Could you guys get away with a new thread asking why he supports terrorism? Maybe someone else has some insight as to why he supports jihadists but fear making OT contributions to unrelated or only loosely related threads.
I think it has become tedious as well, though I can understand the reason for it well enough - Incorruptible thinks he is absolutely right (he's picked an appropriate username in that respect), however he has been thoroughly corrupted by tabloid/fake/heavily biassed news sources into believing that certain problems are orders of magnitude more serious than they actually are. The small grains of truth (which are either non-existent or heavily diluted in any source he believes), are usually quite complex problems with no correct solution (if the ideal to strive for is a free society with a conscience), yet he's naive enough to think, for example, that it simply comes down to "us vs them" (an extremist view, just the sort of thing he claims to oppose), and wilfully ignorant enough to believe the tainted news sources that he so often quotes. Then on a regular basis he likes to demonstrate these attributes with questions like "why aren't you denouncing these extremists?", instead of answering questions put to him.
So it would be great if Incorruptible adopted a less ignorant world view (for example, realising that it almost invariably takes two opposing extremists to tango), but the last thing we need are a legion of Anti-Incorruptibles acting just like him to help him lower the tone.