Does anyone know if ScaLAPACK behaves exactly (or nearly) like LAPACK when called on a single processor? I feel like it should, since ScaLAPACK is algorithmically identical to LAPACK, but I don't have any confirmation of this.
context: I'm working on a CFD project where we will not always be running in parallel. So if running all the linear algebra routines from ScaLAPACK libraries will lead to pain in serial cases, we will need to figure out what routines will never need to go parallel and create 2 versions of everything else...? That seems silly.
-Eric
context: I'm working on a CFD project where we will not always be running in parallel. So if running all the linear algebra routines from ScaLAPACK libraries will lead to pain in serial cases, we will need to figure out what routines will never need to go parallel and create 2 versions of everything else...? That seems silly.
-Eric
