Is the owner of the page on Facebook or twitter?

[SOFTengCOMPelec]

LOL actually I still need to figure out that problem. I might just have to uninstall it from yum and install it from source so I can just fix the problem in the source directly. :biggrin:

I was using Kate (I prefer Gedit, but like Kate as well) recently and it made a *.swp file (in Linux/OpenSuse), which made me wonder if that was your problem.

I went through Kate's options (because of your problem thread), but could not see anything to help you, options wise. But it does seem a bit limited, as regards the options.

 

[alicosgun]

everyone what saying ? ı m not understand.... Who are have facebook or twitter page?

 

[SOFTengCOMPelec]

everyone what saying ? ı m not understand.... Who are have facebook or twitter page?

My understanding is that information like that is NOT available to general users of these forums.
This could well be because the people behind this website want to have a degree of privacy.

If they had released such information, then they would be at risk of receiving huge quantities of unwanted, pestering messages.

If they wanted to release such information, it would be prominently on show, on this website, somewhere.

 

[Red Squirrel]

I was using Kate (I prefer Gedit, but like Kate as well) recently and it made a *.swp file (in Linux/OpenSuse), which made me wonder if that was your problem.

I went through Kate's options (because of your problem thread), but could not see anything to help you, options wise. But it does seem a bit limited, as regards the options.

Yep it is that since I had made it show hidden files and it created the file upon first key stroke. On a local disk it is not noticable but on network due to the slight latency it is. There is an option to turn it off but it does not work like it did in previous versions, so I think it's probably a bug.

 

[ch33zw1z]

 

[SOFTengCOMPelec]

Yep it is that since I had made it show hidden files and it created the file upon first key stroke. On a local disk it is not noticable but on network due to the slight latency it is. There is an option to turn it off but it does not work like it did in previous versions, so I think it's probably a bug.

This looks like it might be your issue:

Apparently it is a known bug

I have not delved in to it further, but there may already be a bug corrected version available, I will let you look into it.

Correction: It has been fixed, apparently.

Bug 258897 - "Disable swap files syncing" option does not work

EDIT: To avoid being too off-topic, I had better put future replies in your old thread about this.

 

[Red Squirrel]

HA! That's funny. Well it solves that issue. Too bad it probably wont make it into the apt-get repo for a long time, but at least I know I'm not crazy.

 

[SOFTengCOMPelec]

HA! That's funny. Well it solves that issue. Too bad it probably wont make it into the apt-get repo for a long time, but at least I know I'm not crazy.

Yes, it is funny!

Too bad it probably wont make it into the apt-get repo for a long time

It's one of those things I guess. One time there was a new (linux, disk partition option) coming out, later. I wanted it so badly, I dedicated a computer to having the "unstable" pre-release version.

Anyway, after the entire partition vanishing (no data loss, I knew it was very risky), about a week later, or so, I learnt my lesson, and try to stay away from "unstable" etc, unless I desperately need it or want to help them test and/or develop it. (I pre tested it in VMs, and it seemed fine).

but at least I know I'm not crazy.

Yes, it's very reassuring to know it is a known/fixed problem.