Yeah GPU supplies are awful right now. You got a budget?
I wouldn't know what sort of integrated graphics are offered with an AMD processor. But given the fact that I could only fill a cart with the GTX 1070 Mini OC that I bought four years ago for twice what I paid for it then, I'm building a machine that survives on the iGPU of an Intel processor until a sane routine equilibrium settles over the dGPU market. Oh, sure, I've got a spare GTX-970 full-length card that would hold me over, but my custom-building plan calls for a Mini card.
I'm still trying to be kind to everyone about needs with which I'm not entirely familiar. My own interests are car-racing and flight simulators. I can game in 1440 or 1080 -- either one. I only have the GTX 1070 -- that's all. And I'm only rocking a Kaby Lake 4-core i7-7700K OC'd to AVX2 toleration at 4.8Ghz.
There must be "new games" that would work better on a hexa-core like an i5-10600K. I just don't have them. I never collected action comic books or action figurines; I have to see what it's worth to me to develop skills for any particular game. But I have other things to do with my computer, and it keeps me very busy.
I've been pissy with folks suggesting that I need to buy a Comet Lake processor right away. I'm going to finish the case-preparation and other sub-projects on my Sky-and Kaby-Lake systems. Eventually I should be able to swap out the mobo, the CPU, and as necessary -- the RAM -- to still use the same cases, PSUs, drives of any and all flavors.
But right now, after replacing the original Sky- with a Kaby- for 4.8Ghz, all the other cars at Le Mans are faster, my keyboard responds the same and I have the same reaction times. It's good, but it's frustrating. Should I buy a hexa-core now to make it worse? Just kidding.
No, I'll have some bucks to drop on the RIGHT motherboard and the RIGHT [last year's] processor after I've pre-planned what I'm getting myself into and what I can get out of it.