Well, the reason that I resurrect this thread, was the premise of that comment and how things turned out, 10 years later (or so).
It was a debate between the i3 and the 2500(K).
Well, we know today, that the 2500K, is only just now reaching the end of it's reign as a viable gaming CPU, with AAA games now requiring (effectively) 6 cores or more. (AC: Oddysee, Tomb Raider, some basketball game (or was it one of the more recent FIFA games)).
The i3 isn't even discussed any more, except as a mobile / laptop CPU, for the most part.
Given that, I thought that, although early, I thought that I would crown the 3900X as AMD's current "2500K equivalent". Plenty of threads, plenty of cache, good boost clock, altogether a great CPU. (Granted, it is $499.)
The Ryzen R5 3600 @ $200, is this generation's i3 CPU. Well, sort of. Maybe I'm mixing tiers a bit, and the APUs could be considered akin to Intel's i3 CPUs, and the R5 3600 akin to an i5-2400, and a 3600X akin to an i5-2500K.
But now, it has been announced (officially?) three new platforms for ThreadRipper, with the possibility of using 8-channel DDR4 on the high end. So, while "mainstream" AM4 Ryzen 3000-series CPUs get more cores (16C/32T with 3950X) and starts to eclipse 1st-gen ThreadRipper / HEDT, AMD is planning on totally eclipsing current-gen ThreadRipper with 3rd-Gen TR. It should be a sight to behind, maybe they'll even have a consumer HEDT 32C/64T CPU, or even 48C or 64C. Glorious! (For those of us that can put the cores to good use.)