is the current version of outlook not a giant POS?

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
because the version i have sure is. it won't sync properly, it won't close properly, it can't do anything else while sync'ing. its outlook 2000 (version 9.00 :Q how did they get through 9 versions? the program isnt' that old!)
 

Mr N8

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
8,793
0
76
I like a lot of the improvements they made with Outlook 2003. It seems to be easier to use and easier to read. Of course, it is still bloated, and takes up even more resources than Outlook XP or 2000 ever did.
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
2003 is awesome. No problems here. Do you mean syncing as in PocketPC/Palm syncing, IMAP or Exchange offline folder use?
 

Aves

Lifer
Feb 7, 2001
12,232
29
101
Originally posted by: ElFenix
outlook 2000 (version 9.00 :Q how did they get through 9 versions? the program isnt' that old!)
Because that version number comes from the version of Office.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
Originally posted by: aves2k
Originally posted by: ElFenix
outlook 2000 (version 9.00 :Q how did they get through 9 versions? the program isnt' that old!)
Because that version number comes from the version of Office.

i'm pretty sure office hasn't gotten that many versions on windows either. i think the first version of word for windows was 3.0. though it had been on the mac for a long time before that, and was on a higher version number there.

sorta like how windows NT started on version 3.0.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
ok i'm gonna walk over to the computer center and plunk down my $14 for office 2003 today.
 

TMPadmin

Golden Member
Jul 23, 2001
1,886
0
0
I never had any problems with any of the outlooks MS released. Hey, there's always Hotmail :)

Word had ver 2.0 back in the 486-33 days.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
21
81
I'll also recommend Office 2003, it's the first version of office that has loaded faster than the previous version.

ZV
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix
ok i'm gonna walk over to the computer center and plunk down my $14 for office 2003 today.
OHHH!
I didn't realize you were complaining about 2000. That was the "current version" of Outlook 4 years ago! :confused:
BTW, do you have all the SP's & updates installed?

OK, on third look, I understand the post. The wording was very confusing.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
21
81
Originally posted by: TMPadmin
Word had ver 2.0 back in the 486-33 days.
I remember using MS Works 1.04 on an IBM PS/2 Model 25 (286-16, 640K, MCGA screen, DOS 4.0, and two of the brand-new, really fancy 1.44 MB floppy drives). I miss that machine sometimes.

ZV
 

Kenazo

Lifer
Sep 15, 2000
10,429
1
81
another happy 2003 user here. :) XP and 2000 sucked. terribly slow and no better than Outlook ex in my opinion.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,813
9,019
136
BTW, after upgrading, Office Update is your friend!!! You need it to keep Outlook's junk mail filter up to date (I think they release updates every few months or so...) But if ye be a pirate, avast ye! I heard Office Update doesn't work with pirated versions! :)
 

minendo

Elite Member
Aug 31, 2001
35,558
16
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix
ok i'm gonna walk over to the computer center and plunk down my $14 for office 2003 today.
Well worth it. The Junk Filter in Outlook 2k3 is great.

 

BillGates

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2001
7,388
2
81
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: ElFenix
ok i'm gonna walk over to the computer center and plunk down my $14 for office 2003 today.
OHHH!
I didn't realize you were complaining about 2000. That was the "current version" of Outlook 3 years ago! :confused:
BTW, do you have all the SP's & updates installed?

that's what I was thinking. I wonder if he also has a "new car" from 2000?
 

cbeavers

Member
Feb 8, 2003
191
0
0
I've been using Outlook 2003 for a couple of months now, and I really like it. It has alot of new features and options available. It also supports PST files over 2gig.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,215
14
81
Originally posted by: werk
2003 is awesome. No problems here. Do you mean syncing as in PocketPC/Palm syncing, IMAP or Exchange offline folder use?

I agree right now I am currently using Outlook 2K3 and it is a vast improvement over Outlook 2000


Sysadmin
 

zimu

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2001
6,210
0
0
i also use outlook 2003, love it. didn't realize there were so many previous versions- my guess is they just skipped version numbers!!