I think I'd rather have not had it. Why? Because if we didn't have it, then people would vote for representatives who'd reduce the size of the standing army to practically nothing because they'd get sick of housing the whole army.
While I wouldn't want to house soldiers, I don't want to pay taxes in the future to build bases either.
The Bill of Rights should have decreased the standing army and congressional war powers. Maybe something like saying that conscripts shall not be required to go off U.S. soil.
Now if someone could prove to me that the 3rd Amendment does individualism a lot of good and that I'm wrong, then that would be great.
While I wouldn't want to house soldiers, I don't want to pay taxes in the future to build bases either.
The Bill of Rights should have decreased the standing army and congressional war powers. Maybe something like saying that conscripts shall not be required to go off U.S. soil.
Now if someone could prove to me that the 3rd Amendment does individualism a lot of good and that I'm wrong, then that would be great.
