Is Steve Nash overrated?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,686
18,025
126
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: sdifox
I don't know much about basketball, but I thought the players vote for mvp? Obviously they should know the game better than us mere mortals? So if they voted for Nash, it must mean something no?

No, it's a poll of around 125 sports writers/reporters that get to vote for the MVP.

Personally I think they should include the ballots of GM's and Head Coaches for about 50% of the votes.

Ok, so it's still a bunch of people who are more knowledgeable than us since their livelihood depend on it right? That was the point I was trying to make. I like the idea of including GM and Head Coaches.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
I can't believe a thread like this exists.. if you can't tell that Steve Nash is one of the most talented Basketball players of this era then I weep for you.

There's about a dozen other players who are 'one of the most talented of this era' as well.

He's so much more then just talented though, do you even watch him play? Talent doesn't even begin to describe his play on the court, he transforms the entire team just by being the ball handler.

That's what a top point guard does by default, responsible for running the offense and getting everyone good shots. That does not automatically make a top point guard the top player in the league.

Nash also transforms their defense, essentially turning it from a man-to-man defense to a zone in order to 'accomodate' his inequities.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Originally posted by: hdeck
watch any suns game without nash. they are completely inept without him. the award is most valuable player, not best player.

Most teams that rely on a solid point guard are inept without him. And its not the most valuable player on a team, its the most valuable player in the league.
 

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
Originally posted by: ntdz
Nash overrated? Yeah right. The Suns are a .500 team without him, and a .750 team with him. Look at what he's done since he came to the Suns, it's mind boggling how much better they are now than they were before without him.

Then how come the Mavericks are much better without him? The first year he left, the Mavs won more games. The second year he left, the Mavs went to the finals for the first time. The third year he left, the Mavs....well, the Mavs are the best team in the NBA.
 
Feb 17, 2005
4,300
0
0
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: ntdz
Nash overrated? Yeah right. The Suns are a .500 team without him, and a .750 team with him. Look at what he's done since he came to the Suns, it's mind boggling how much better they are now than they were before without him.

Then how come the Mavericks are much better without him? The first year he left, the Mavs won more games. The second year he left, the Mavs went to the finals for the first time. The third year he left, the Mavs....well, the Mavs are the best team in the NBA.

I think its more because Cuban added more dept into the team compared to when it was the Dirk, Nash, and Finley trio. Now the team is loaded with various experienced role players and not to mention the addition of Avery Johnson and the fact Josh Howard is playing like the all star he is.
 

BrokenVisage

Lifer
Jan 29, 2005
24,771
14
81
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
I can't believe a thread like this exists.. if you can't tell that Steve Nash is one of the most talented Basketball players of this era then I weep for you.

There's about a dozen other players who are 'one of the most talented of this era' as well.

He's so much more then just talented though, do you even watch him play? Talent doesn't even begin to describe his play on the court, he transforms the entire team just by being the ball handler.

That's what a top point guard does by default, responsible for running the offense and getting everyone good shots. That does not automatically make a top point guard the top player in the league.

Nash also transforms their defense, essentially turning it from a man-to-man defense to a zone in order to 'accomodate' his inequities.

So you're saying the top point guard in the league can't be a 3-time MVP winner?

At his size he does all he can on defense, and as you know it's all about how much effort you put into it while on D, I see him putting lots of effort into it he's just not as athletic as others. He also has a back problem, yet he's still out there taking charges (most on the team), trying to make key steals (watch that 2nd OT against Dallas?), and still finds enough energy to do it night-in, night-out while playing on a team that demands you never slow down and makes you think on your feet.
 

neegotiator

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2006
1,117
1
0
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: ntdz
Nash overrated? Yeah right. The Suns are a .500 team without him, and a .750 team with him. Look at what he's done since he came to the Suns, it's mind boggling how much better they are now than they were before without him.

Then how come the Mavericks are much better without him? The first year he left, the Mavs won more games. The second year he left, the Mavs went to the finals for the first time. The third year he left, the Mavs....well, the Mavs are the best team in the NBA.

Id attribute that moreso to Avery Johnson than Nash leaving. They were in a relative funk when Nelson was still there, then when Avery took over they took off. He finally got Dirk to stop being such a pansy and drive inside, and got him to play some D as well. I just wonder if Nash were still on board, would Avery have the same effect on Nash and if they'd be a helluva lot better than they are now.
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Nash is one hell of a player. he's really fun to watch. I think Kobe is, right now, the best basketball player in the world. Dirk should be the frontrunner for the MVP. But no, i don't think Nash is underrated. He's an amazing point guard, and right now, the best PG in the world.
 

hdeck

Lifer
Sep 26, 2002
14,530
1
0
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: hdeck
watch any suns game without nash. they are completely inept without him. the award is most valuable player, not best player.

Most teams that rely on a solid point guard are inept without him. And its not the most valuable player on a team, its the most valuable player in the league.

most valuable player in the league to his team. the conversation is the same every year, that's why he's won it twice.
 

MobileLoser

Member
Mar 3, 2007
126
0
0
Yep I agree with the sentiment here. Nash is not overrated, and makes the Suns a competitive team that is among the most fun to watch.
 

thesurge

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,745
0
0
Originally posted by: suicidalpigeon
Originally posted by: DaShen
Actually, my friend just made a valid point. None of the leading offensive all-stars are great defensively, so Nash still gets my vote.

Dwayne Wade did rather well on the defensive end before he went out.

Kobe is actually a pretty good defensive player; however, he has steadily lost his defensive explosiveness over time. Tim Duncan is also a great defensive/offensive player.