• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

is SGIII THE phone on verizon now?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
and you cannot do this with a low end or mid range phone that will cost the tax payer less? Hell, low end in 2012 is high end in 2011. There are Android phones out that for $0.

$200 is a small price to pay for a phone that works. A lot of those cheap phones suck or at the very least they don't have much staying power.
 
How do you think government workers are paid?

The fact that OP's phone bill is paid by his job is a testament to the rash spending of our tax money to "useless" shit.

Last time I checked, companies in the private sectors aren't mostly funded in taxes.

So, when someone working for the government on official business is given an international phone, that's a waste of tax money? Or do you think he's just some scrub being given a free phone?

No idea why you're bringing this argument into this thread, but there are plenty of reasons why someone gets a phone from work - the primary reason being to actually get work done!
 
The Rezound is slow, fat, has crappy battery life, and an inferior screen compared to the S3. The display on the Rezound isn't even optically bonded to the outer glass so there will be a visible gap and dust could even get between the two.

It's great with the leaked ICS rom, fat? opinion, I personally hate thin phones, I had a One X and it felt like a plastic toy, way too thin and way too light. But that's just my opinion *shrug*


Battery life? The Galaxy has better talk time, everything else is virtually identical. And with the leaked ICS rom the Rezound will surpass it in everything but talk time and video play back.

Screen's inferior? another opinion. The SGIII screen isn't anything special, and as with every other Samsung phone the whites look god awful. But! the blacks are superior so that negates the piss poor whites right? Rezound has poor blacks SGIII has poor whites, if you use your phone outdoors the Samsung gets >. If you use it in doors and aren't running hacked system apps that are inverted the whites on the Rezound will blow the Samsung away. The stock GB system apps are all white, same with ICS. Neither phone has a clearly better screen, it all depends on what you plan to use the phone for. I'm not saying the Rezound has a better screen, I'm saying for what *I* use my phone for it has a much better screen. This obviously isn't the case for you.
 
and you cannot do this with a low end or mid range phone that will cost the tax payer less? Hell, low end in 2012 is high end in 2011. There are Android phones out that for $0.

My wife has a low end droid with a tiny screen, no 4g, and is stuck on 2.2. No thanks. Is go back to my blackberry before that

Verizon gives government fantastic deals on high end phones, and they have the state contract.

It's also called employee retention. They could give me a real raise due thanks to buget policy but could give me a phone to entice me to not leave for a higher paying private sector job. You want gov to suck less and be more productive and less wasteful but not.fight to retain good employees?




How do you think government workers are paid?

The fact that OP's phone bill is paid by his job is a testament to the rash spending of our tax money to "useless" shit.

Last time I checked, companies in the private sectors aren't mostly funded in taxes.


besides banks and car companys right? And its not useless.




$200 is a small price to pay for a phone that works. A lot of those cheap phones suck or at the very least they don't have much staying power.

Seriously all this. Not that this discussion has anything to do with what phones are good 🙂

Tapatalking on my pos thunderbolt. Sorry for teh typos!
 
It's great with the leaked ICS rom, fat? opinion, I personally hate thin phones, I had a One X and it felt like a plastic toy, way too thin and way too light. But that's just my opinion *shrug*


Battery life? The Galaxy has better talk time, everything else is virtually identical. And with the leaked ICS rom the Rezound will surpass it in everything but talk time and video play back.

Screen's inferior? another opinion. The SGIII screen isn't anything special, and as with every other Samsung phone the whites look god awful. But! the blacks are superior so that negates the piss poor whites right? Rezound has poor blacks SGIII has poor whites, if you use your phone outdoors the Samsung gets >. If you use it in doors and aren't running hacked system apps that are inverted the whites on the Rezound will blow the Samsung away. The stock GB system apps are all white, same with ICS. Neither phone has a clearly better screen, it all depends on what you plan to use the phone for. I'm not saying the Rezound has a better screen, I'm saying for what *I* use my phone for it has a much better screen. This obviously isn't the case for you.

Sadly I can't run roms. Would make the tbolt way better if I could

Tapatalking on my pos thunderbolt. Sorry for teh typos!
 
My wife has a low end droid with a tiny screen, no 4g, and is stuck on 2.2. No thanks. Is go back to my blackberry before that

Verizon gives government fantastic deals on high end phones, and they have the state contract.

It's also called employee retention. They could give me a real raise due thanks to buget policy but could give me a phone to entice me to not leave for a higher paying private sector job. You want gov to suck less and be more productive and less wasteful but not.fight to retain good employees?







besides banks and car companys right? And its not useless.






Seriously all this. Not that this discussion has anything to do with what phones are good 🙂

Tapatalking on my pos thunderbolt. Sorry for teh typos!

Seriously, you will leave for another job over a friggin phone? Then go. Also, there are many midrange phones that have LTE, Android 2.3 and a decent screen. I am only mentioning this because you are not the only person and all this adds up. WOrse, we are in a deep recession and wasting money on fancy phones that do not increase productivity but increase cost is a waste. OP should try to make himself the exception and be prudent with the taxpayer's money. Don't make excuses. Lead by example.
 
It's great with the leaked ICS rom, fat? opinion, I personally hate thin phones, I had a One X and it felt like a plastic toy, way too thin and way too light. But that's just my opinion *shrug*


Battery life? The Galaxy has better talk time, everything else is virtually identical. And with the leaked ICS rom the Rezound will surpass it in everything but talk time and video play back.

Screen's inferior? another opinion. The SGIII screen isn't anything special, and as with every other Samsung phone the whites look god awful. But! the blacks are superior so that negates the piss poor whites right? Rezound has poor blacks SGIII has poor whites, if you use your phone outdoors the Samsung gets >. If you use it in doors and aren't running hacked system apps that are inverted the whites on the Rezound will blow the Samsung away. The stock GB system apps are all white, same with ICS. Neither phone has a clearly better screen, it all depends on what you plan to use the phone for. I'm not saying the Rezound has a better screen, I'm saying for what *I* use my phone for it has a much better screen. This obviously isn't the case for you.

Considering the fact that you spent most of another thread proclaiming the superiority of the One X's whites vs AMOLED displays when it turns out the Galaxy Nexus and HTC One S both have more accurate whites than it I don't think you have much credibility when it comes to mobile displays.

The fact is the Rezound is simply a mediocre device, it has a slow Snapdragon S3 that can't even playback 720p video smoothly per your own comments, it's nearly twice as thick as some of it's competitors, and the old Super LCD display it has was never top of the line.
 
Seriously, you will leave for another job over a friggin phone? Then go. Also, there are many midrange phones that have LTE, Android 2.3 and a decent screen. I am only mentioning this because you are not the only person and all this adds up. WOrse, we are in a deep recession and wasting money on fancy phones that do not increase productivity but increase cost is a waste. OP should try to make himself the exception and be prudent with the taxpayer's money. Don't make excuses. Lead by example.

its about the whole package, total compensation. The phone was part of a change in scope of employment that made me turn down a higher paying job elsewhere.

this discussion is over since you continually insist incorrectly that work providing me a phone doesnt increase productivity.


I have come in under budget on every project I have worked on at this job(save one, but it was within the contingency and I increased its scope about 6 times during the project). Including 10K this year merely auditing our MS Licensing that my predecessor and current coworker were too lazy to deal with. costing us over 10k a year for atleast the last 5 years.

the 50 bucks a monthy it costs is some of the best spending of my local gov. these aren't your tax dollars, its my tax dollars(county government) and I take as good of care of them as I can, but that doesnt mean I should work comparibly for peanuts

take your holier than thou BS outta here. its not the point of this thread, nor is warrented if you think I am a tax leech because of a 50 dollar phone package from my government employer so that I have work email and vpn access 24/7(which is when I am on call, 24/7 365). This is certainly not abnormal in the IT field for systems and network administrators. Only people that have on call requirements here are offered phones. (Speaking of lead by example, I did turn down the 4g mifi and laptop replacement last year since my personal laptop was fairly new)




'we' also only get offered cetain phones, and its mostly the halo phones. last month they(verizon govt sales) offered free bionics to anyone who hadnt gottena new phone in 12 months(saldy it ended a week before the incident with my thunderbolt) though the bionic is now EOL and will also get no updates past the ICS update.
 
Last edited:
Considering the fact that you spent most of another thread proclaiming the superiority of the One X's whites vs AMOLED displays when it turns out the Galaxy Nexus and HTC One S both have more accurate whites than it I don't think you have much credibility when it comes to mobile displays.

The fact is the Rezound is simply a mediocre device, it has a slow Snapdragon S3 that can't even playback 720p video smoothly per your own comments, it's nearly twice as thick as some of it's competitors, and the old Super LCD display it has was never top of the line.

lol. You consider purple white more "accurate"?
 
lol. You consider purple white more "accurate"?

Have you ever seen any of these displays? the Galaxy Nexus and One S have a white point right at 6500k while the One X's is under 6000k, a obvious shift to the red side of the spectrum.

If you're going to make claims about a display you might want to do a little research first if you want to be taken seriously.
 
Have you ever seen any of these displays? the Galaxy Nexus and One S have a white point right at 6500k while the One X's is under 6000k, a obvious shift to the red side of the spectrum.

If you're going to make claims about a display you might want to do a little research first if you want to be taken seriously.

hes just trollin the whole thread
 
Have you ever seen any of these displays? the Galaxy Nexus and One S have a white point right at 6500k while the One X's is under 6000k, a obvious shift to the red side of the spectrum.

If you're going to make claims about a display you might want to do a little research first if you want to be taken seriously.

of course I've seen them. Many times and the whites are very dim and not white at all. Of course, we've been over this many times and many have acknowledged that oleds are weak when it comes to color accuracy and brightness. end of story.
 
of course I've seen them. Many times and the whites are very dim and not white at all. Of course, we've been over this many times and many have acknowledged that oleds are weak when it comes to color accuracy and brightness. end of story.

So you don't have any evidence to support your pint that the whites are better?
 
Maybe your eyes need calibration?

lol. no. It does not. I can't believe y'all really believe OLED whites are superior to LCD whites. You must also think a BMW M3 is better than a Carrera GTS. You must think an Android phone is better than an iPhone. You must think McDonalds is better than Asiate. Or LCD is better than plasma. Or mp3 is better quality than SACD/DVD-Audio.

If you believe these things then there is no arguing. Experience trumps all.
 
lol. no. It does not. I can't believe y'all really believe OLED whites are superior to LCD whites. You must also think a BMW M3 is better than a Carrera GTS. You must think an Android phone is better than an iPhone. You must think McDonalds is better than Asiate. Or LCD is better than plasma. Or mp3 is better quality than SACD/DVD-Audio.

If you believe these things then there is no arguing. Experience trumps all.

Your experience or other people's?
 
Your experience or other people's?

Both. If you've experienced one and still insist that the inferior product is better then either you're stupid or just stupid. I can understand if, by being poor, you get accustomed to poor taste. But all that should vanish once you experience higher quality, irrespective of any sentimental thoughts.
 
Both. If you've experienced one and still insist that the inferior product is better then either you're stupid or just stupid. I can understand if, by being poor, you get accustomed to poor taste. But all that should vanish once you experience higher quality, irrespective of any sentimental thoughts.

So your argument is that if someone doesn't agree with you they are stupid?

Thats it? Even my six year old has grown out of using those arguments, maybe it's time for you to grow up?
 
lol. no. It does not. I can't believe y'all really believe OLED whites are superior to LCD whites. You must also think a BMW M3 is better than a Carrera GTS. You must think an Android phone is better than an iPhone. You must think McDonalds is better than Asiate. Or LCD is better than plasma. Or mp3 is better quality than SACD/DVD-Audio.

If you believe these things then there is no arguing. Experience trumps all.

Experience means jack shit if you don't have a good baseline to compare that experience.

If a screen has an almost perfect reproduction of the color white but your baseline is off by 1000K, then yes, you will think that the white is not "true" white, even though by scientific standards it is.
 
If you have unlimited data now, you better preorder or upgrade before the 28th or you will loose it.

nope, I will not...
You must think an Android phone is better than an iPhone.
subjective but explians your air of superiority and self importantance 😛[/B]

and thats probably why you are trolling my thread with nonsense....because I dont want a iPhone 😱
So your argument is that if someone doesn't agree with you they are stupid?

Thats it? Even my six year old has grown out of using those arguments, maybe it's time for you to grow up?

from what I am reading this IS an issue with OLEDs but that was a 2 year old article
 
Back
Top