T tallman45 Golden Member May 27, 2003 1,463 0 0 Feb 7, 2005 #1 Confused a bit by the numbering scheme Sempron 3100+ 256kb L2 cache retail cost $121 A64 2800+ 512kb L2 cache retail cost $120 Both run at 1.8ghz Both 754 socket
Confused a bit by the numbering scheme Sempron 3100+ 256kb L2 cache retail cost $121 A64 2800+ 512kb L2 cache retail cost $120 Both run at 1.8ghz Both 754 socket
C cryptonomicon Senior member Oct 20, 2004 467 0 0 Feb 7, 2005 #2 2800 is by small percentages. you coulda found this out on anand in about 2 mins. what is confusing you is the "PR RATING" the pr rating of the sempron follows the AXP rating scheme. the A64 rating scheme is a different mhz/pr ratio.
2800 is by small percentages. you coulda found this out on anand in about 2 mins. what is confusing you is the "PR RATING" the pr rating of the sempron follows the AXP rating scheme. the A64 rating scheme is a different mhz/pr ratio.
T tallman45 Golden Member May 27, 2003 1,463 0 0 Feb 7, 2005 #3 Everything I found did indicate the A64 was the better choice. The PR ratings threw me as well as the lower (slight) cost of the 2800+. Who would but a 3100+ when for the same price an A64 can be had ?
Everything I found did indicate the A64 was the better choice. The PR ratings threw me as well as the lower (slight) cost of the 2800+. Who would but a 3100+ when for the same price an A64 can be had ?
M mamisano Platinum Member Mar 12, 2000 2,045 0 76 Feb 7, 2005 #4 They are the same except: 2800 has double the cache 2800 is 64-bit enabled. So, for the same price it is an easy answer, the 2800.
They are the same except: 2800 has double the cache 2800 is 64-bit enabled. So, for the same price it is an easy answer, the 2800.
C chinkgai Diamond Member Apr 4, 2001 3,904 0 71 Feb 7, 2005 #5 dont be silly. pick the a64 and not the budget chip.