Is removing the headphone jack really going to be a thing moving forward?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
I got part of the way into that article, but then the author starts saying stuff like this:

There's simply more audio information traveling over a wire than can travel over the air.

Say it with me now: wired almost always sounds better than wireless.
Not really. Wireless has all the bandwidth necessary to bitstream the original compressed or lossless source, to be decoded by the DAC in the headphones (and you could find headphones with a better DAC than what's built-into your phone). They just needed a proper standard for that. I don't know much about the new wireless protocol Apple is pushing, but I'm fairly certain it can do something like bit-streamed AAC/ALAC/PCM simultaneously with another stream for system sounds / notifications / etc. That means it wouldn't need to decode/mix/re-encode on your mobile device.

At least, that's the way I'd do it if I was an Apple engineer.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Give me two USB type-C (or lightning I guess if you're apple) and we can talk.

Give people the ability to charge with 1 port, and listen to music with the other.
Hell make them interchangeable if you want. They're all USB ports, and USB type-C allows for analog passthrough, so you can support older headphones with a small adapter, as well as newer headphones with their own higher quality amps/DACs built in and powered via USB.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
So if Bluetooth headphones sound good (as the beats studio wireless do), what's the problem with getting rid of the headphone jack?
They sound decent at best. If that's good enough for you that's fine. I'd be willing to pay more for better sound quality than the momentum wireless gives but nothing seems to exist.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
I got part of the way into that article, but then the author starts saying stuff like this:
I didn't post that as any sort of technical writeup on why wired is better than wireless, but just answering why 'courage' is brought into this. People know it was just a line of bullshit from Apple, and have been mocking it ever since.
 

Rifter

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,522
751
126
LOL @ all the people thinking bluetooth is as good as wired, read the article i posted earlier in this thread, it is clearly NOT as good as wired.

Bluetooth is average SQ at best, but as soon as you get past the $200 price point for headphones bluetooth cant hold a candle to wired. When they fix this and have BT with 30-40+ hours battery then maybe removing the headphone jack will be a better idea, but right now its just stupid.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
LOL @ all the people thinking bluetooth is as good as wired, read the article i posted earlier in this thread, it is clearly NOT as good as wired.

Bluetooth is average SQ at best, but as soon as you get past the $200 price point for headphones bluetooth cant hold a candle to wired. When they fix this and have BT with 30-40+ hours battery then maybe removing the headphone jack will be a better idea, but right now its just stupid.
I'm curious why though - some I'm sure is due to the compression but I always thought apt-x was supposed to get pretty close. The other part I imagine is fitting all the extra hardware, battery, NC functions, controls into basically the same physical space as wired headphones means you have to make compromises on the actual headphone hardware.

That being said - I do like the Momentum Wireless over ears for commuting in NYC as they're pretty stylish, sound decent, and the NC is good while still giving me a faint sense of what's going on around me. Battery life is excellent as well as I don't even have to charge them weekly. The price for the sound quality was a bit annoying but I would have been happy to pay a couple hundred more over if it meant getting to great sound quality.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Wireless will never be better, or even as good as wired connections. Even if you can get the bandwidth and range increased and lower the latency, you're going to be using far more power than simply connecting the two devices with copper.

While wireless can be fine for most uses, high quality audio generally isn't the proper place for it.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
What is the audio source? Pandora? YouTube? Music app?
Doesn't matter. You can hear the pulsing as soon as you plug in the adapter with the earphones plugged in. It interrupts whatever audio source you listen to be it YouTube, music, whatever.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
Doesn't matter. You can hear the pulsing as soon as you plug in the adapter with the earphones plugged in. It interrupts whatever audio source you listen to be it YouTube, music, whatever.
Most likely its just a bad adapter no? Try getting it exchanged the next time you're near an Apple store.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
It is kinda weird how Apple didn't come up with a new standard. Like, what they should have done was create a wireless algorithm akin to APT-X which transmits the actual data file, like if you are playing an MP3 file it should send raw file data to the headphones and then they decode it locally for best sound quality.

On a related note, why did Apple adopt lightning when USB-C was so close? And then go on to use USB-C on their laptops?
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
It is kinda weird how Apple didn't come up with a new standard. Like, what they should have done was create a wireless algorithm akin to APT-X which transmits the actual data file, like if you are playing an MP3 file it should send raw file data to the headphones and then they decode it locally for best sound quality.

On a related note, why did Apple adopt lightning when USB-C was so close? And then go on to use USB-C on their laptops?
Pretty sure AirPods use a new Apple standard that almost certainly bitstreams.

Also, wasn't USB-C like 2 years after Lightning? Development of USB-C was probably going nowhere until Lightning kicked off some urgency to get a competitive non-Apple standard.
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Let us keep in mind that (aside from audio measurement equipment), the human ear is the ultimate arbiter as to how "good" audio sounds, in a car or anywhere. If your hearing is defective in any way, then the quality of musical sound will be different for you than it is for me. The earlier note about mids being a key indicator of sound quality makes sense to me. I suffer from tinnitus, and miss a lot of highs in recordings. Hence my comment about listening to uncompressed formats, especially in the car, especially with high quality speakers. As noted on the Polk site:
"The most important determinant of a speaker’s frequency performance is not its width or range, but whether it’s capable of reproducing all the audible frequencies at the same volume at which they were recorded."

So, what you're hearing in your car has plenty of variables at play before the sound gets to your ears. But for God's sake, don't settle for shitty MP3 compression to start with.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
It is kinda weird how Apple didn't come up with a new standard. Like, what they should have done was create a wireless algorithm akin to APT-X which transmits the actual data file, like if you are playing an MP3 file it should send raw file data to the headphones and then they decode it locally for best sound quality.

On a related note, why did Apple adopt lightning when USB-C was so close? And then go on to use USB-C on their laptops?

Lightning launched with the iPhone 5 in 2012. The first USB-C phones didn't show up until, what, late 2015? And even then, they were really just using the connector since the flash performance wasn't going to justify USB 3.0/3.1. I suspect Apple decided that adopting a new proprietary connector was better than either settling for microUSB or trying to design around the Dock Connector for another three years.

As for USB-C in computers? That's fairly simple: computer peripherals are going to use USB-C, not Lightning, so Apple had to adopt that standard no matter what. Also, USB-C can do certain things that Lightning can't, like charging a laptop or driving a 5K display, so it was always going to be necessary. I can't help but hope that Apple uses the iPhone 8 redesign as an excuse to replace Lightning with USB-C, but I'm not counting on it... Lightning is a bit smaller and, by now, is relatively common.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
Pretty sure AirPods use a new Apple standard that almost certainly bitstreams.

Also, wasn't USB-C like 2 years after Lightning? Development of USB-C was probably going nowhere until Lightning kicked off some urgency to get a competitive non-Apple standard.

I don't see any evidence of this.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
I don't see any evidence of this.

I don't believe it uses a new audio codec. However, Apple does do an interesting trick where it delivers audio to both earbuds at the same time, rather than sending it to one bud that relays info to the other (which is apparently quite common).
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,396
136
I'm not giving up my $300 DUNU DN-2000J IEM's anytime soon. They sound amazing, often being compared to $900 AKG IEM's. And Bluetooth audio is compressed. It's not the same with highly resolving buds. I hope the headphone jack stays around for a long time on Android.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,494
7,752
136
By the time Bluetooth 5 comes out, bandwidth won't be an issue. The spec is rated for 2 Mbps which is sufficient for CD digital audio (clocks in at around 1.4 million bits per second) so there's no technical need to compress it if you don't want to, but most people can't tell or even if they can don't have the kind of headphones that allow them to do so.

If you're absolutely in need of a wired connection or have a good pair of wired headphones already, you can probably get a USB-C to 8mm audio converter for dirt cheap. Hell, even Apple's proprietary lightning converter is only $10 so you know these can easily go for a few bucks at most.

Do people really care that much about the audio jack or was is just some hill the people who hate Apple decided to fight and die on?
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
Do people really care that much about the audio jack or was is just some hill the people who hate Apple decided to fight and die on?
Nothing you said negates the use of a headphone jack for wired outputs. It's been discussed to death the fact that not every one, in every use case wants to put up with yet another thing to be charged/paired/kept track of- and F dongles. Again, something needless to keep track of and still doesn't solve charging/listening issues without more dongles or more ports. (Which is silly, if you need to add another port to replace... A PORT!)

You can use bluetooth with an audio jack present or not, so it seems to me people arguing in favor of removing it are the ones picking a hill to fight and die on. You're really buying the nonsense that anyone needs that space for something? It was proven Apple lied that they needed that space for what they claimed.

I personally think its a bit silly to argue against options that don't even affect you. If you absolutely MUST have a phone with no headphone jack.. knock yourself out with Apple and whoever else follows.

Until there's an actual compelling reason though for no headphone jack, that is a standard that's actually better and solves all the negatives: no dongles, no need to charge the headphones unless you want to, no problem charging device and listening without extra crap, no question the sound quality is same or better, etc etc... then lay off my headphone jack. No, it's not obsolete. No, it's not 'brave' removing it. No, I and many others don't want to put up with the (so far) not-as-good alternatives, especially (and TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS if not anything else) since they are ALREADY alternatives I can use anyway! No removal of ANYTHING ELSE is needed. Right now. TODAY. Has been for some time.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Until there's an actual compelling reason though for no headphone jack, that is a standard that's actually better and solves all the negatives: no dongles, no need to charge the headphones unless you want to, no problem charging device and listening without extra crap, no question the sound quality is same or better, etc etc... then lay off my headphone jack. No, it's not obsolete. No, it's not 'brave' removing it. No, I and many others don't want to put up with the (so far) not-as-good alternatives, especially (and TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS if not anything else) since they are ALREADY alternatives I can use anyway! No removal of ANYTHING ELSE is needed. Right now. TODAY. Has been for some time.

I don't buy Apple's "courage" line, but I do see a point in the next few years where it's eventually vindicated. Bluetooth headphones that last for days on a charge, see little to no sacrifice in audio quality (Bluetooth 5 is a start toward this) and don't carry as much of a price premium. The problem, as is often the case with Apple, is that it likes to make these kinds of moves early, before everything's ideal and most people are ready to move on.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,494
7,752
136
You can use bluetooth with an audio jack present or not, so it seems to me people arguing in favor of removing it are the ones picking a hill to fight and die on.

In 2-3 years I imagine that most phones won't have a headphone jack, so my question is what are the people who carried on about needing one going to do? Skip the flagship devices that dropped the headphone jacks or limit their purchase choices to only phones that have a headphone jack?

My guess is they get a dongle if they've got a pair of wired headphones or just get some Bluetooth headphones if they don't have a nice set of wired headphones and then realize how silly they've been for the last several years. Yeah, Apple is stupid for playing it up as "courage" when they could have just said it's time to move on and left it at that, but everyone turning headphone jacks into such a big deal is being just as idiotic. Are they really going to buy something else that's inferior in several other ways over a headphone jack if it comes down to it?

Until there's an actual compelling reason though for no headphone jack, that is a standard that's actually better and solves all the negatives

Headphones with a USB-C connector? I suppose that requires USB-C to stick around forever, which it very well could do, at least in terms of the technology world. Or just get a dongle. Seriously it's not that bad. I got one for my iPad since the audio jack is crapping out on it (mostly my fault for using some cheap earpods and letting the plug bend) so I got a dongle. I just leave it attached to the plug on the earpods I use and it's not an issue.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
In 2-3 years I imagine that most phones won't have a headphone jack, so my question is what are the people who carried on about needing one going to do? Skip the flagship devices that dropped the headphone jacks or limit their purchase choices to only phones that have a headphone jack?

My guess is they get a dongle if they've got a pair of wired headphones or just get some Bluetooth headphones if they don't have a nice set of wired headphones and then realize how silly they've been for the last several years. Yeah, Apple is stupid for playing it up as "courage" when they could have just said it's time to move on and left it at that, but everyone turning headphone jacks into such a big deal is being just as idiotic. Are they really going to buy something else that's inferior in several other ways over a headphone jack if it comes down to it?

There's no guarantee that it'll go that way for certain, but I picture these people eventually resembling Richard Stallman when he goes laptop shopping: so limited by that insistence on a certain feature (whether it's headphone jacks or open source code) that they end up buying a horribly compromised overall product. Even when the benefits of that feature are starting to fade away.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
In 2-3 years I imagine that most phones won't have a headphone jack, so my question is
If in two or three years big companies decide you don't need wi-fi any more on your device, what are you going to do? You'll just have to buy more data. And switch to a hotspot in your house, not your own backward ass wi-fi network. What's wrong with you people sticking with something you like, and not worrying about the bottom line of big corporations and what they say is best for you?

Now go buy more data from Verizon and dongles and adapters and stop griping that you want your wi-fi. It's a thing of the past and you should be brave enough to admit you didn't know what was best for you.


Headphones with a USB-C connector? I suppose that requires USB-C to stick around forever,
Or even make an appearance on an iPhone!
These big companies are *REALLY* looking out for you making things simpler and easier! Now enjoy your USB-C headphones... with your handy-dandy lightning adapter!
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,029
10,520
126
limit their purchase choices to only phones that have a headphone jack?
That's exactly what I'll do. My S5 is getting a little flaky, and I've just about decided to get a lg g2 to replace it. It has removable storage, a removable battery, and sufficient performance. I don't need the newest shiniest pos the companies want me to buy. My computers need to be fit for the task, and that requires the above, as well as a headphone jack. Needless to say I don't have sufficient courage for apple products.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,494
7,752
136
If in two or three years big companies decide you don't need wi-fi any more on your device, what are you going to do?

That's a bit of a false equivalence. It would be a better example if there was some completely new (but incompatible wireless standard) that has better performance or uses a fraction of the power. Or perhaps its something else like some weird communication by quantum entanglement where you don't even need to send data through the air. If you had either of those, you could make a rather compelling case for dropping WiFi in favor of something newer.

You're just saying that a feature gets cut completely without any replacement which isn't the same. Isn't Apple even shipping earpods that have a lightning connector now? That doesn't necessarily help you if you hate their earpods (I find them horribly uncomfortable) or have your own headphones, but it's not as though people are being left with no way of listening to music, movies, etc.

You'll just have to buy more data. And switch to a hotspot in your house, not your own backward ass wi-fi network.

Or you buy a WiFi dongle that plugs in via USB-C (or whatever connector) and your device can use WiFi again.

What's wrong with you people sticking with something you like, and not worrying about the bottom line of big corporations and what they say is best for you?

Now go buy more data from Verizon and dongles and adapters and stop griping that you want your wi-fi. It's a thing of the past and you should be brave enough to admit you didn't know what was best for you.

I don't care about the financials, but I doubt they save that much money by dropping the headphone jack as there aren't licensing costs and its easy to make and you can probably get the components from dozens of manufacturers.

You're also assuming a motive for my argument when there is none. I just don't give a gnat's fart about having a headphone jack because it's so far down the list of concerns that I can't care compared to dozens of other considerations that go into buying a device. Implying that everyone who thinks not buying a device due to a lack of headphone jack is silly is some kind of corporate whore is just being intellectually dishonest.

There's always going to be someone who insists that a feature needs to stick around well after it should be put out to pasture. In three years your argument will look as silly as the people who lamented about computers ditching floppy disk drives because a lot of people were still using them. This has happened hundreds of times throughout tech history and will happen hundreds more in the future. Just because it's some technology you care about this time around doesn't make it special, just the hill you decided to fight and die upon.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
That's a bit of a false equivalence. It would be a better example if there was some completely new (but incompatible wireless standard) that has better performance or uses a fraction of the power.
Actually your counterpoint makes no sense in context. The headphone jack hasn't been replaced with anything completely new, or better performing, and it requires more power, not less. Not sure where you were going with that, but you made MY point! Just changing something without improving it is not a help to the consumer. You basically answered your own questions I was responding to in the first place!


Or you buy a WiFi dongle that plugs in via USB-C (or whatever connector) and your device can use WiFi again.
LOL! Sorry, just had to laugh at that point. You guys and your dongles! On a phone! LOL!

No- most people would never accept anything as absurd as using a stupid wifi dongle on their phone to replace something the previous generation of phones already had and didn't need to be messed with.

The whole point was to illustrate how just because a company may do something stupid with a device -remove features that aren't obsolete and don't need to be removed, only to be "replaced" by soemthing we already had (!!) here are those of us who are going to call that what it is: stupid. greedy. unnecessary. backward.


I don't care about the financials, but I doubt they save that much money by dropping the headphone jack as there aren't licensing costs and its easy to make and you can probably get the components from dozens of manufacturers.
Again, not sure how you're doing anything but making points IN FAVOR of NOT removing the headphone jack. Were you thinking otherwise?

In case you missed it, the talk of this being greedy on Apple's part- is not anything absurd like they save money on the jack itself. It's exactly the opposite. Because its a standard Apple can't charge anyone for, they don't make money using it. So they remove it and gouge money by forcing the use of a standard they can make money off of (Bluetooth headphones, earbuds - lightning headphones if such have to be licensed by others, and of course stupid dongles. There's mountains of money to be made. None of it benefits the consumer one iota though, because all it is is purposefully removing a viable alternative that already exists and is in fact, standard.

I just don't give a gnat's fart about having a headphone jack because it's so far down the list of concerns that I can't care compared to dozens of other considerations that go into buying a device.
Well good for you, but no one else buys a device based on what YOU need. Despite Apple's bullshit, the vast majority of the public did NOT indicate that they no longer use wired headphones.

Implying that everyone who thinks not buying a device due to a lack of headphone jack is silly is some kind of corporate whore is just being intellectually dishonest.
It's not that, it just parroting the silly excuses for it put forward by these large companies that is a bit being a corporate suck-up. There's really no compelling reason this early in the game to remove wired headphone jacks as the technology to replace it isn't actually a better replacement, and as I've pointed out before, bluetooth exists right now, today, this very minute IN ADDITION to the wired headphone jack on MOST devices. Most audio devices that exist in the world today have a headphone jack. Desktop speakers. Stereo systems. Tablets. Laptops. Phones. Pro audio gear. Amps, Cameras- the list goes on and on and on.

Trying to create a separate standard just for phones, that will eventually just make a big stupid mess when reaching for a pair of headphones (oh do I need USB-C ones for this, or lighting, or some stupid combo of dongles, etc..) isn't improving anything. I'm gonna laugh my ass off eventually when I see someone with their dumb phone-headphones have to use a dongle to get back to *drumroll* the STANDARD audio jack on just about *everything!* else in the known audio universe! I wonder if some who thought that was a great idea will think to themselves, "Gee, was this trip really necessary?"

There's always going to be someone who insists that a feature needs to stick around well after it should be put out to pasture.In three years your argument will look as silly as the people who lamented about computers ditching floppy disk drives because a lot of people were still using them.
Talk about a silly comparison. As I said, just about EVERYTHING in the audio universe uses the standard headphone jack. Still. To this day. Granted, it can either be 1/4 or 1/8- but there's a STANDARD that's in use by most everything audio related when it comes to headphones. Many, many, many more people than ever touched a floppy drive use the same headphones with a phone- a tablet, their stereo, their roku remote, MP3 players, car stereos, every type of audio equipment imaginable. There's no USB-C-to-lightning-to-stupid dongle setup that's better/cheaper/easier/more power efficient/ less hassle that will replace all of this in the near future.
 
Last edited: