A 5k is just a sprint. A 10k is the start to running long distance.
The worst part about running, is that it is incredibly boring. At least on a bike you get to see some country side in the same time span, without fucking up your joints. (At least not nearly in equal measure)
10k running is the standard for olympic-distance for triathlon though, so if you can aim for 35 minutes, it shouldn't be too bad.
A 5k is just a sprint. A 10k is the start to running long distance.
The worst part about running, is that it is incredibly boring. At least on a bike you get to see some country side in the same time span, without fucking up your joints. (At least not nearly in equal measure)
10k running is the standard for olympic-distance for triathlon though, so if you can aim for 35 minutes, it shouldn't be too bad.
I like NASCAR, but I find Indy racing primitive. There is no way an Indy race will ever be the equal of a NASCAR race. I know the cars are faster, but they have an unfair advantage, using parts designed for longer faster, and shall we say, unevolved tracks. I guess F1 racing is acceptable in certain less cultured areas, as long as they keep it out of the good ol' US and A.
NASCAR ain't racin, it's driving really fast in packs in a circle for eternity.
Indy can be a little boring, especially since they too follow the "lets drive in circles forever" mentality half the time, and half the road courses are simply boring for what those cars can achieve.
F1 is pure win, minus the paved paradise approach for modern safety measures.
I never got the fascination with long distance running. So many people do it, but why? You are only fvcking up your knees and hip joints in the end. There's not much skill required, just takes practise to build up endurance.
I used to be a former 100m/200m sprinter in high school, naturally extremely gifted but I was never interested in formal training (if your not gonna be Usain Bolt, then why bother..). But I can see the joy of sprinting, you run like the wind, tear past people. It helps you in sports as well.
But long distance running? Don't get me wrong, I don't mind it I did some for a while when was 21. 7km daily on grass. Took care of my knees. But I know alot of people at work who are into long distance running and training for marathons. It's a bit of a joke, they are wasting their time thinking they are accomplishing something when in actuality they are fvcking up their bodies.
Its the mentality I guess. Alot of these office goers are high achievers, and they feel they are achieving something through running. Watching minutes fall off their times...
But I digress..
Running is also much more efficient, time wise. A typical runner burns 2-3x as many calories in the same amount of time as they do biking.
I think your definition of "efficient" is wrong.
Obviously I was referring to exercise efficiency, not mode of transportation efficiency. The goal of an exerciser is quite often to burn calories, not conserve them (as your presumed definition would suggest) and you can burn more calories in a shorter period of time by running. Therefore, running is a more efficient form of exercise.
Pretty sure calories burned is a byproduct of effort, not time.
Separate but equal, but mostly separate, that's my motto!