Sheik Yerbouti
Lifer
Is poverty voluntary? For the most part, no fucking way. What an inane question.
Is poverty voluntary? For the most part, no fucking way. What an inane question.
Then how do you explain the people who choose not to work and live in poverty?
Because if they worked a minimum wage job they would still be in poverty.
Because if they worked a minimum wage job they would still be in poverty.
Wouldn't they also have to potential to get a promotion or learn new skills that would help them get a better paying job?
Of course, If they manage to survive their commute/travel needed to get to and from work. and if the travel doesnt cost them more than 100% of their income.
But right now, there just aren't Jobs out there.
I thought we just had a "stellar" jobs report?Of course, If they manage to survive their commute/travel needed to get to and from work. and if the travel doesnt cost them more than 100% of their income.
But right now, there just aren't Jobs out there.
I thought we just had a "stellar" jobs report?
Since they think it's tied to Obama they only want to talk UE3I thought we just had a "stellar" jobs report?
Since they think it's tied to Obama they only want to talk UE3
Since they think it's tied to Obama they only want to talk UE3
Yep. Other than that its how they "feel" about the job market.
When I say the job market sucks, I'm a right wing nut job. When democrats say it, they are trying to protect the little guy. When I say people chose government assistance over low paying jobs, I'm a nazi. When democrats say it, they are just looking out for the little guy.
Its so fun to watch so many people change their arguments based on how they "feel". So few people actually care what the truth is, far fewer seek it.
Buy a fucking mirror you troll!
And electrons; It seems as all he can do is generate insults; nothing constructiveYou are a serious waste of oxygen.
That is why the ignore function exists. 😉And electrons; It seems as all he can do is generate insults; nothing constructive
That is why the ignore function exists. 😉
Just because youre receiving means-tested benefits doesnt mean youre not working. According to 2012 Census Bureau data, roughly 23 percent of households with at least one working adult received means-tested benefits.
For Medicaid, 28 percent of recipients between the ages of 18 and 64, worked full time, according to the Census Bureau. (Another 15 percent of recipients in that age group worked part time.)
Other means-tested benefits show considerable overlap with the population of working adults. Roughly 60 percent of food stamp recipients who were of working age and werent disabled were employed while receiving benefits, according to a Census Bureau sample calculated by the liberal Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
This matters because working recipients of means-tested benefits would be counted on both sides of the comparison, casting doubt on the notion that theres a strict divide between people who work and people who are on welfare.
We still live in the greatest nation on earth. Why is it that with all the opportunities that are afforded us most people still claim victim? Why is it that an immigrant can still come from overseas and make a decent living for themselves?
Poverty isn't voluntary. Still, I'm not blind to the disadvantages people have when they are born into a crappy family and environment. I'm not blind to the fact that someone with the financial means and support is going to have a much easier time thriving in our society.
IMO, It's our choices that determine our future. Not our environment.
This.
I would like to add one point though. Often it is very hard to drag yourself out of low paying jobs and 'poverty'. However, it is very possible to get your kids out through hard work and dedication, both on the part of the children and the parents. Thats why so many immigrants from Asis/India end up in the USA working poor low paying jobs but their kids study hard and up with well paying jobs. Its cultural as well.
Pretty good and even-handed article on the subject:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/12/anti-poverty-programmes