Is oil a renewable resource?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

txrandom

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2004
3,773
0
71
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: txrandom
So it does renew on a small scale?

Look up the definition of renewable resource.

Originally posted by: Rogodin2
I say we should help renew the oil supply by killing more stuff.

I'd say we've destroyed enough life (700,000+) in our most recent war.


Rogo


That seems... inflated. I smell a left winger.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid=Mozilla-search&va=renewable
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
Sure, oil may be renewable if you want to wait a hundred million years for a century's worth of fuel. I say "may be" because the geological conditions would have to be right.
 

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
capable of being replaced by natural ecological cycles or sound management

There was one blip in the history of this earth that produced 'oil'-it isn't and wasn't a cycle.

Nice try lad.

Rogo
 

txrandom

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2004
3,773
0
71
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Yes by government standard it's not renewable because it's on a small scale that it's not feasible. But your question didn't ask that.

Is this the caveman arguement?

Fire wasn't a renewable resource before Promithius.

I'm assuming your a modern man by asking the question.

Rogo

No idea what caveman argument is. Fire is a renewable "resource", fire was around much longer than before Promithius.
 

txrandom

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2004
3,773
0
71
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
capable of being replaced by natural ecological cycles or sound management

There was one blip in the history of this earth that produced 'oil'-it isn't and wasn't a cycle.

Nice try lad.

Rogo

No, oil was not made in one blip of time. It was a continuing process that takes millions of years, and that process is still going on today.
 

da loser

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,037
0
0
who cares about how long it takes to make the process has already started, it has more to do with the consumption rate vs formation rate.

there are no renewable resources if you don't limit the consumption.

Originally posted by: Rogodin2
capable of being replaced by natural ecological cycles or sound management

There was one blip in the history of this earth that produced 'oil'-it isn't and wasn't a cycle.

Nice try lad.

Rogo

and what blip was this?
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: txrandom
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: txrandom
So it does renew on a small scale?

Look up the definition of renewable resource.

Originally posted by: Rogodin2
I say we should help renew the oil supply by killing more stuff.

I'd say we've destroyed enough life (700,000+) in our most recent war.


Rogo


That seems... inflated. I smell a left winger.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid=Mozilla-search&va=renewable

http://www.answers.com/renewable

Agree to disagree. :)
 

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/save_screen.cfm?ARTICLE_ID=23172

It is bogus.

There are no numbers to back it up. I've posted the EIA's chart for supply and demand based on real numbers, but none of the trolls have responded to it ;)

Rogo
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
this thread is just idiotic, the OP asks a stupid question and then gets mad when people don't give him the answer he wants to hear. We don't need you people from peakoil.com coming over and talking down like we don't already all know that oil is not renewable. However the fact is that oil IS produced by decaying organic material now just like it was millions of years ago, however the rate of production is insignificant compared to current consumption. WE can argue technicalities about oil being renewed, we can just as easily say wind and solar will some day run out (when the sun goes bye-bye) however for all intents and purposes wind and solar are constant and oil is diminishing. This is COMMON KNOWLEDGE and it doesn't take a stupid thread to tell people stuff that we have probably all know wince we were 10 years old.
 

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
This is COMMON KNOWLEDGE

That was my reason for creating this poll. It's 44% proven that the cross-section of this forum doesn't have ANY COMMON KNOWLEDGE.

Wind and sun don't run out unless you're Descartes-but then again he couldn't see.

Are one of the same?

Rogo
 

aCynic2

Senior member
Apr 28, 2007
710
0
0
It renews at a pace slow enough to consider it a non-renewable source.

To consider it a renewable source of energy, it would need to reproduce at a rate that equals consumption and maintains pace with consumption growth.

It doesn't even come close, so it isn't.
 

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
BT

You post a sig that states many people need to understand logical fallacies before they post-yet you presuppose that people understand the finite level of oil? If they can't use logic as a tool then they can't understand the basic premise of resource levels.

You might want to use your own sig as a map to thinking and posting in my threads.

Rogo
 

johnjbruin

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2001
4,401
1
0
For all practical purposes - no. We are not going to see the change in our lifetime because it takes thousands of years to happen.

Theoretically - yes.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
BT

You post a sig that states many people need to understand logical fallacies before they post-yet you presuppose that people understand the finite level of oil? If they can't use logic as a tool then they can't understand the basic premise of resource levels.

You might want to use your own sig as a map to thinking and posting in my threads.

Rogo

Wow, you're such a pompous ass. Did you make this thread just to say "hey, look how smart I am!"?
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Originally posted by: johnjbruin
For all practical purposes - no. We are not going to see the change in our lifetime because it takes thousands of years to happen.

Theoretically - yes.

Everybody knows that, all the yes votes are just to piss off this sky is falling troll who suddenly can't stop talking about energy.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
I say we should help renew the oil supply by killing more stuff.

I'd say we've destroyed enough life (700,000+) in our most recent war.


Rogo

Great! They'll eventually turn into more oil. Problem solved.