Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
Originally posted by: vivy310
nourdmrolNMT1 :
You must be someone below the age of 10. Calling someone stupid without stating any good reason why they seem to be "stupid" just makes you, yourself seem very stupid and babyish.
Grow up.
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
I would like to tell you that you are wrong. If you read my previous post it can be considered a full sentence (i believe.). I also do not like your style, signing your name in all caps at the bottom of your post? I mean that is so damn :cartman" Lame :/cartman:
. Also, i believe i had every right to post this thread, it is in no way a calling out. I just cannot believe that someone would post a thread like that.
MIKE
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
I would like to tell you that you are wrong. If you read my previous post it can be considered a full sentence (i believe.). I also do not like your style, signing your name in all caps at the bottom of your post? I mean that is so damn :cartman" Lame :/cartman:
. Also, i believe i had every right to post this thread, it is in no way a calling out. I just cannot believe that someone would post a thread like that.
MIKE
And your thread is any better how?
Scientific? I have yet to see anything remotely related to "scientific" evidence.Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
I dont really think it is better, however, i am trying to provide scientific proof that NewSC2 is really "that stupid" and if i can come up with ti, then my experiment is solved.
MIKE
Another weak response from MIKEOriginally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: So
What?
the OP of "is smoking really that dangerous"
MIKE
You are not one to be calling other AT members out. In your term of membership you have yet to formulate a complete sentence. Furthermore, you write like a damn AOL kiddie.
MIKE
I would like to tell you that you are wrong. If you read my previous post it can be considered a full sentence (i believe.). I also do not like your style, signing your name in all caps at the bottom of your post? I mean that is so damn :cartman" Lame :/cartman:
. Also, i believe i had every right to post this thread, it is in no way a calling out. I just cannot believe that someone would post a thread like that.
MIKE
And your thread is any better how?
I dont really think it is better, however, i am trying to provide scientific proof that NewSC2 is really "that stupid" and if i can come up with this evidence then my experiment is solved.
MIKE
Originally posted by: minendo
Scientific? I have yet to see anything remotely related to "scientific" evidence.Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
I dont really think it is better, however, i am trying to provide scientific proof that NewSC2 is really "that stupid" and if i can come up with ti, then my experiment is solved.
MIKE
MIKE
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: minendo
Scientific? I have yet to see anything remotely related to "scientific" evidence.Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
I dont really think it is better, however, i am trying to provide scientific proof that NewSC2 is really "that stupid" and if i can come up with ti, then my experiment is solved.
MIKE
MIKE
The poll is very scientific. It takes other peoples thoughts of what NewSC2 has posted, analyzes them and deduces if he is really "that stupid" and it seems that most people agree that when you post a thread entitled "is smoking really that bad" that he must be "that stupid".
MIKE
Originally posted by: Shelly21
You guys are funny.
MICHELLE
Originally posted by: Shelly21
You guys are funny.
MICHELLE
Unfortunately...Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: Shelly21
You guys are funny.
MICHELLE
thats because most of us posting in this thread currently attend, or will attend PU.
MIKE
