DanTMWTMP
Lifer
Originally posted by: dolph
i've heard for some time that oriental:asian is basically like eskimo:inuit, but sherepunjab seems to have an interesting argument. it's true, the term asian goes far beyond those who are commonly referred to as asians, so why do they have the monopoly on the term? what does oriental translate into that would make it offensive enough to be replaced? this isn't flamebait, i'm honestly curious.
because the term "oriental" is mainly used for objects and not people. ... in the past....when asians were made fun of by caucasions, they would call us orientals and treat us as if we were some form of object..ever since then....it stuck....and became offensive....kinda how u don't call an african-american a "negro" (sorry for posting that word)
yeah..hehe there u have it 🙂