- Dec 13, 2005
- 2,589
- 27
- 91
I notice this mostly with games (of both console and computer variety) and it got me wondering. I'm sure companies would love nothing more than to license media rather than actually sell it. Why sell a game that can can later be resold, when you could instead sell a license to multiple people? I'm sure companies would love to get even a fraction of the used games market, and are looking to do so (see EA's $10 program).
Personally, I prefer owning a physical copy of something, and will only buy digitally at reduced prices. I also refuse to pay full price with platforms such as Steam where I am unable to resell or gift a game when I am finished with it.
I know there are people who are fine with that, but would the general public accept licensed only media? Instead of buying a CD, you license it. Same with movies, games, and software. Will people accept and even embrace that concept? And if they did, would other companies see a market and sell actual products rather than licenses?
I have a feeling that it might not be all that bad, given an appropriate price and model. While it's not quite in the same vein, Netflix does not give you permanent ownership of a product, but lets you view many movies or series at a lower price than if you were to purchase them individually (assuming you watch enough TV). On the other hand, I hesitate to think that companies would lower prices for licenses as opposed to actual goods.
Personally, I prefer owning a physical copy of something, and will only buy digitally at reduced prices. I also refuse to pay full price with platforms such as Steam where I am unable to resell or gift a game when I am finished with it.
I know there are people who are fine with that, but would the general public accept licensed only media? Instead of buying a CD, you license it. Same with movies, games, and software. Will people accept and even embrace that concept? And if they did, would other companies see a market and sell actual products rather than licenses?
I have a feeling that it might not be all that bad, given an appropriate price and model. While it's not quite in the same vein, Netflix does not give you permanent ownership of a product, but lets you view many movies or series at a lower price than if you were to purchase them individually (assuming you watch enough TV). On the other hand, I hesitate to think that companies would lower prices for licenses as opposed to actual goods.