Is it [H] & [I]

HWF

Member
Jun 6, 2001
83
0
0
Have you looked at the article over at overclockers.com and related links. If this stuff is true about then I'm really disappointed. It seems something is bad wrong when people and lots of people get banned for questions about the truth.

See what you think.

 

HWF

Member
Jun 6, 2001
83
0
0
vi_edit
I see the highlighting but I did not do it and if I did I do not know how I did it.
 

agnitrate

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2001
3,761
1
0
I just looked through the whole main page and I still have no idea what the hell you are talking about.

That's why we post links to articles here. Do yourself a favor and post the link before you get flamed to death.

-silver
 

ScrapSilicon

Lifer
Apr 14, 2001
13,625
0
0
uh oh...numbers have magic metamorphing powers in charts...
rolleye.gif
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
People actually take HardOCP seriously? When the hell did that happen?
 

Bullhonkie

Golden Member
Sep 28, 2001
1,899
0
76
I never had very much confidence in the credibility of their reviews anyway. And it's just like Kyle to deny it all and mass-ban people from the forums. Nothing new.
rolleye.gif
 

ScrapSilicon

Lifer
Apr 14, 2001
13,625
0
0
lol..from [.h.] ..
rolleye.gif
vBulletin Message
You do not have permission to access this page.
back to the old days for me at hocp ..:(cute phrase was in that thread.."Night of the Long Knives" in reference to all the chopping going on...
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
Originally posted by: ScrapSilicon
Originally posted by: HWF
klah
Thanks for saving me from the flame.
thanks...so...what does it boil down to..?

HardOCP gets funding from Intel Corp.

They post a chart showing the 3.06 being faster than it actually is.
People in Hard Forum call BS.
They change the chart 16 hours later.
People in Hard Forum say WTF?
Kyle & Steve deny chart was ever changed.
Everyone that ever said the chart was changed is IP-banned from Hard Forum.
Geeks everywhere await comments from Van.
 

HWF

Member
Jun 6, 2001
83
0
0
Looks like its a Softocp now what a shame................end of line. Presto chango.
 

HWF

Member
Jun 6, 2001
83
0
0
Hardocp has posted an apology. I wonder if they will un-bann the folks they banned?
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Christ, talk about an overreaction. This whole thing has been blown way out of proportion.
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Christ, talk about an overreaction. This whole thing has been blown way out of proportion.
I still think that his results for 3DM2k1 are entirely made up


3dMark2k1 Results

HardOCP
P4 3.06 HT: 17329
P4 3.06: 16950
P4 2.80: 15264


THG
P4 3.06 HT: 15620
P4 3.06: 15600
P4 2.80: 15251


xbit
P4 3.06 HT: 15571
P4 3.06: 15546
P4 2.80: 15225


Tech-Report
P4 3.06 HT: 15399
P4 3.06: 15389
P4 2.80: 14759


His is the only 3DM2k1 benchmark showing the 3.06 scoring over 13% faster than the 2.8. The rest of these sites show a 3-4% increase.


The only conclusion I can draw is that he is fabricating these results.
 

Antisocial Virge

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 1999
6,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Christ, talk about an overreaction. This whole thing has been blown way out of proportion.


Its his own fault. If they just said "opps we messed up" and corrected it nobody would have cared. The fact that he IP blocked everyone that said a word about and called them liars just threw blood in the waters. He also disabled lots of forum options including registration and a few others I guess. From what I have been reading on other boards this is not the first time he has done this in the face of criticism. It might be blown out of control now but who caused it?


Your picture is a fake, I am flat out telling you your picture is fake, and you posted it intentionally to start trouble. Not sure what axe you are trying to grind.... but lying and saying you saved the picture the "other day" wasn't to smart.