Naming names and taking pot shots at those said individuals is just as immature and spineless as refusal to except being wrong IMO.Originally posted by: Gaard
Being wrong does not warrant ridicule, refusing to admit it does.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Naming names and taking pot shots at those said individuals is just as immature and spineless as refusal to except being wrong IMO.Originally posted by: Gaard
Being wrong does not warrant ridicule, refusing to admit it does.
As long as we're agreed that it's spineless and immature 😉 What good does it do to admit when your wrong if you turn around and call attention to others failings? You are no longer the better individual at that point and have lost the high ground IMO. I would define it as being vindictive, not the greatest characteristic to possess either. Certainly no better than being incapable of admisson of an error. It's just my opinion so take it as you will 🙂Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Naming names and taking pot shots at those said individuals is just as immature and spineless as refusal to except being wrong IMO.Originally posted by: Gaard
Being wrong does not warrant ridicule, refusing to admit it does.
That's called ridicule.
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Yea people like CAD and heatsurgeon have such enormous egos, that they are unwilling to admit they are ever wrong. Even when they have their backs cornered to the wall they still try to dodge and evade the truth.
Originally posted by: chess9
SudheerAnne:
CAD is actually very good at admitting he is wrong. He almost always does so by:
1. Blaming Clinton;
2. Changing the subject;
3. Saying "carry on";
4. Or, some other non sequitur.
🙂
HS usually never replies. He's too busy in his life's work-removing the hearts from all humans, one at at time. 🙂
-Robert
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: chess9
SudheerAnne:
CAD is actually very good at admitting he is wrong. He almost always does so by:
1. Blaming Clinton;
2. Changing the subject;
3. Saying "carry on";
4. Or, some other non sequitur.
🙂
HS usually never replies. He's too busy in his life's work-removing the hearts from all humans, one at at time. 🙂
-Robert
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: chess9
SudheerAnne:
CAD is actually very good at admitting he is wrong. He almost always does so by:
1. Blaming Clinton;
2. Changing the subject;
3. Saying "carry on";
4. Or, some other non sequitur.
🙂
HS usually never replies. He's too busy in his life's work-removing the hearts from all humans, one at at time. 🙂
-Robert
:thumbsup:
*cookie*
*cookie* for chess too.
CkG
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: chess9
SudheerAnne:
CAD is actually very good at admitting he is wrong. He almost always does so by:
1. Blaming Clinton;
2. Changing the subject;
3. Saying "carry on";
4. Or, some other non sequitur.
🙂
HS usually never replies. He's too busy in his life's work-removing the hearts from all humans, one at at time. 🙂
-Robert
:thumbsup:
*cookie*
*cookie* for chess too.
CkG